Borghesi Francesca, Simoncini Gloria, Chirico Alice, Cipresso Pietro
Department of Psychology, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy.
Department of Psychology, Research Center in Communication Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 20123 Milan, Italy.
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Dec 17;24(24):8047. doi: 10.3390/s24248047.
This study examines the relationship between cognitive and affective flexibility, two critical aspects of adaptability. Cognitive flexibility involves switching between activities as rules change, assessed through task-switching or neuropsychological tests and questionnaires. Affective flexibility, meanwhile, refers to shifting between emotional and non-emotional tasks or states. Although similar conceptually, prior research shows inconsistent findings on their link, especially regarding physiological and self-reported measures. Affective flexibility was operationalized as changes in heart rate variability (HRV) in response to transitioning affective stimuli, while cognitive flexibility was assessed using self-report questionnaires that captured individuals' perceived adaptability. The findings revealed that individuals with extremely high or low cognitive flexibility displayed similar HRV patterns in response to emotional stimuli, while those with medium levels of cognitive flexibility showed distinct responses. The Extreme group exhibited higher baseline autonomic activation that decreased after exposure, whereas the Average group's moderate baseline activation increased post-stimuli. This interaction was mainly seen in long-term HRV indexes, while short-term indexes showed a uniform response across groups, suggesting that differences in flexibility were probably not discernible via state features but rather as traits and long-term attributes. The findings suggest that cognitive and affective flexibility exist on a continuum; extremely high and low cognitive flexibility is linked to intense affective responses, while moderate cognitive flexibility corresponds to balanced physiological regulation, supporting the notion that "" (virtue lies in moderation).
本研究考察了适应性的两个关键方面——认知灵活性和情感灵活性之间的关系。认知灵活性涉及随着规则变化在不同活动之间进行切换,通过任务切换、神经心理学测试和问卷调查来评估。与此同时,情感灵活性指的是在情感任务和非情感任务或状态之间进行转换。尽管在概念上相似,但先前的研究在它们的联系方面显示出不一致的结果,特别是在生理和自我报告测量方面。情感灵活性通过心率变异性(HRV)对情感刺激转换的反应变化来操作化,而认知灵活性则使用捕捉个体感知适应性的自我报告问卷进行评估。研究结果显示,认知灵活性极高或极低的个体在对情感刺激的反应中表现出相似的HRV模式,而认知灵活性处于中等水平的个体则表现出不同的反应。极端组表现出较高的基线自主激活,在暴露后降低,而平均组适度的基线激活在刺激后增加。这种相互作用主要出现在长期HRV指标中,而短期指标在各组中表现出一致的反应,这表明灵活性的差异可能无法通过状态特征来辨别,而更可能是作为特质和长期属性。研究结果表明,认知灵活性和情感灵活性存在于一个连续体上;极高和极低的认知灵活性与强烈的情感反应相关,而适度的认知灵活性对应于平衡的生理调节,支持了“中庸之道”的观点。