Should practice and policy be revised to allow for risk-proportional payment to human challenge study participants?
作者信息
Jamrozik Euzebiusz, Selgelid Michael J
机构信息
Monash Bioethics Centre, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
Ethox & Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
出版信息
J Med Ethics. 2020 Dec;46(12):835-836. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106900. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Should practice and policy be revised to allow for risk-proportional payment to human challenge study participants?实践和政策是否应该修订，以便向人类挑战研究参与者提供与风险相称的报酬？
J Med Ethics. 2020 Dec;46(12):835-836. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106900. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
2
Payment of research participants: current practice and policies of Irish research ethics committees.研究参与者的报酬：爱尔兰研究伦理委员会的现行做法和政策。
J Med Ethics. 2013 Sep;39(9):591-3. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100679. Epub 2012 Dec 1.
3
The paradoxical case of payment as benefit to research subjects.将支付作为对研究对象的益处这一矛盾案例。
IRB. 1989 Nov-Dec;11(6):1-3.
4
"Like a Sheriff in a Small Town": Status, Roles, and Challenges of Ethics Committees in Academic Colleges of Education."小镇警长"：高校教育学院伦理委员会的地位、角色和挑战。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2021 Jul;16(3):290-303. doi: 10.1177/15562646211005253. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
5
Hyperbaric research at Duke University--ethical considerations.杜克大学的高压氧研究——伦理考量
Forsvarsmedicin. 1973;9(3):373-8.
6
7
Navigating Informed Consent Requirements and Expectations in Cluster Randomized Trials: Research Ethics Board Members' and Researchers' Views.在群组随机对照试验中应对知情同意要求和期望：研究伦理委员会成员和研究人员的观点。
Ethics Hum Res. 2023 Nov-Dec;45(6):31-45. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500189.
8
Paying research participants: a study of current practices in Australia.向研究参与者支付报酬：澳大利亚当前实践研究
J Med Ethics. 2005 Sep;31(9):542-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2004.009290.
9
Ethics of clinical trials for research ethics boards: proceedings of a national workshop.研究伦理委员会的临床试验伦理：一次全国性研讨会会议记录
NCBHR Commun. 1991 Nov-Dec;2(2):4-23.
10
Open label extension studies and the ethical design of clinical trials.开放标签扩展研究与临床试验的伦理设计。
IRB. 2001 Jul-Aug;23(4):1-5.
引用本文的文献
1
Rationale and Ethical Assessment of an Oropharyngeal Gonorrhea Controlled Human Infection Model.口咽淋病受控人体感染模型的原理与伦理评估
J Infect Dis. 2025 Apr 15;231(4):841-848. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaf029.
2
The ethical anatomy of payment for research participants.研究参与者付费的伦理剖析。
Med Health Care Philos. 2022 Sep;25(3):449-464. doi: 10.1007/s11019-022-10092-1. Epub 2022 May 24.
3
Influence of Environmental Aesthetic Value and Anticipated Emotion on Pro-Environmental Behavior: An ERP Study.环境审美价值和预期情绪对亲环境行为的影响：一项 ERP 研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 7;19(9):5714. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095714.
本文引用的文献
1
Payment in challenge studies: ethics, attitudes and a new payment for risk model.挑战研究中的支付：伦理、态度和风险模型的新支付方式。
J Med Ethics. 2020 Dec;46(12):815-826. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106438. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
2
SARS-CoV-2 challenge studies: ethics and risk minimisation.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2（SARS-CoV-2）挑战研究：伦理与风险最小化
J Med Ethics. 2020 Sep 25;47(12):e79. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106504.
3
Coronavirus Human Infection Challenge Studies: Assessing Potential Benefits and Risks.人类冠状病毒感染挑战研究：评估潜在的获益和风险。
J Bioeth Inq. 2020 Dec;17(4):709-715. doi: 10.1007/s11673-020-10030-x. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
4
Money-oriented risk-takers or deliberate decision-makers: a cross-sectional survey study of participants in controlled human infection trials.以金钱为导向的冒险者或深思熟虑的决策者：一项关于人体受控感染试验参与者的横断面调查研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 26;10(7):e033796. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033796.
5
COVID-19 human challenge studies: ethical issues.COVID-19 人体挑战研究：伦理问题。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Aug;20(8):e198-e203. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30438-2. Epub 2020 May 29.
6
Exploring Ethical Concerns About Human Challenge Studies: A Qualitative Study of Controlled Human Malaria Infection Study Participants' Motivations and Attitudes.探索关于人类挑战研究的伦理问题：对受控人类疟疾感染研究参与者的动机和态度的定性研究
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2019 Feb;14(1):49-60. doi: 10.1177/1556264618820219. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
7
Ethical considerations in Controlled Human Malaria Infection studies in low resource settings: Experiences and perceptions of study participants in a malaria Challenge study in Kenya.资源匮乏地区人体疟疾感染对照研究中的伦理考量：肯尼亚一项疟疾激发试验中研究参与者的经历与看法
Wellcome Open Res. 2018 Oct 29;3:39. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14439.2. eCollection 2018.
8
A Framework for Ethical Payment to Research Participants.研究参与者伦理支付框架。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 22;378(8):766-771. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb1710591.
9
Regulatory experience of TOPS: an internet-based system to prevent healthy subjects from over-volunteering for UK clinical trials.TOPS的监管经验：一个基于互联网的系统，用于防止健康受试者过度自愿参与英国的临床试验。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Dec;73(12):1551-1555. doi: 10.1007/s00228-017-2329-9. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
10
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
Presse Med. 2016 Sep;45(9):719-22. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2016.08.003.
Zotero 插件