Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerpen, Belgium
APIN Public Health Initiative, Abuja, Nigeria.
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Nov;5(11). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003269.
Substantial disparities in care outcomes exist between different subgroups of adolescents and youths living with HIV (AYLHIV). Understanding variation in individual and health facility characteristics could be key to identifying targets for interventions to reduce these disparities. We modelled variation in AYLHIV retention in care and viral suppression, and quantified the extent to which individual and facility characteristics account for observed variations.
We included 1170 young adolescents (10-14 years), 3206 older adolescents (15-19 years) and 9151 young adults (20-24 years) who were initiated on antiretroviral therapy (ART) between January 2015 and December 2017 across 124 healthcare facilities in Nigeria. For each age group, we used multilevel modelling to partition observed variation of main outcomes (retention in care and viral suppression at 12 months after ART initiation) by individual (level one) and health facility (level two) characteristics. We used multiple group analysis to compare the effects of individual and facility characteristics across age groups.
Facility characteristics explained most of the observed variance in retention in care in all the age groups, with smaller contributions from individual-level characteristics (14%-22.22% vs 0%-3.84%). For viral suppression, facility characteristics accounted for a higher proportion of variance in young adolescents (15.79%), but not in older adolescents (0%) and young adults (3.45%). Males were more likely to not be retained in care (adjusted OR (aOR)=1.28; p<0.001 young adults) and less likely to achieve viral suppression (aOR=0.69; p<0.05 older adolescent). Increasing facility-level viral load testing reduced the likelihood of non-retention in care, while baseline regimen TDF/3TC/EFV or NVP increased the likelihood of viral suppression.
Differences in characteristics of healthcare facilities accounted for observed disparities in retention in care and, to a lesser extent, disparities in viral suppression. An optimal combination of individual and health services approaches is, therefore, necessary to reduce disparities in the health and well-being of AYLHIV.
在不同亚组的青少年和青年艾滋病毒感染者(AYLHIV)中,护理结果存在显著差异。了解个体和卫生机构特征的差异可能是确定干预目标以减少这些差异的关键。我们对 AYLHIV 的护理保留和病毒抑制进行了建模,并量化了个体和机构特征对观察到的变异的解释程度。
我们纳入了 2015 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月期间在尼日利亚 124 家医疗保健机构接受抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)的 1170 名青少年(10-14 岁)、3206 名青少年(15-19 岁)和 9151 名青年(20-24 岁)。对于每个年龄组,我们使用多水平模型按个体(一级)和卫生机构(二级)特征划分主要结局(ART 启动后 12 个月的护理保留和病毒抑制)的观察到的变异。我们使用多组分析比较了个体和机构特征在年龄组之间的影响。
在所有年龄组中,机构特征解释了护理保留观察到的大部分差异,而个体特征的贡献较小(14%-22.22%对 0%-3.84%)。对于病毒抑制,机构特征在青少年中占较大比例的变异(15.79%),但在青少年(0%)和青年(3.45%)中占比较小。男性更有可能不保留在护理中(调整后的比值比(aOR)=1.28;p<0.001 青年),也更不可能实现病毒抑制(aOR=0.69;p<0.05 青少年)。增加机构级别的病毒载量检测降低了非保留护理的可能性,而基线方案 TDF/3TC/EFV 或 NVP 增加了病毒抑制的可能性。
医疗保健机构特征的差异解释了护理保留方面观察到的差异,并且在较小程度上解释了病毒抑制方面的差异。因此,需要结合个体和卫生服务方法的最佳组合,以减少 AYLHIV 的健康和福祉方面的差异。