Suppr超能文献

硝苯地平与肼屈嗪治疗妊娠重度高血压的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验。

Efficacy of nifedipine versus hydralazine in the management of severe hypertension in pregnancy: A randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki, Nigeria.

出版信息

Niger Postgrad Med J. 2020 Oct-Dec;27(4):317-324. doi: 10.4103/npmj.npmj_275_20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the availability of effective antihypertensive drugs, the quality of evidence regarding the best antihypertensive agent for the treatment of hypertensive emergencies in pregnancy is still poor.

AIM

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and side effects of oral nifedipine and intravenous hydralazine for control of blood pressure (BP) in severe hypertension in pregnancy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An open-label, parallel, randomised, controlled trial of 78 pregnant women (≥28 weeks' gestation) with severe hypertension was conducted. Severe hypertension was defined as systolic BP of 160 mmHg or above and/or diastolic BP of 110 mmHg or above. They were randomly (1:1 ratio) administered oral nifedipine 20 mg or intravenous hydralazine 10 mg every 30 min up to 5 doses or until the target BP of 140-150 mmHg systolic and 90-100 mmHg diastolic was achieved. Intravenous labetalol was given if the primary treatment failed. The primary outcome measure was the number of doses needed to achieve targeted BP. The secondary outcome measures were the time needed to achieve desired BP, maternal adverse effects and perinatal outcome.

RESULTS

The sociodemographic characteristics did not differ between the two study groups. The average number of dosages (nifedipine; 1.4 ± 0.6 vs. hydralazine; 1.7 ± 0.5, P = 0.008) needed to control the BP was lower in the nifedipine arm. Time (min) taken to control the BP was similar between the groups (hydralazine; 43.7 ± 19.7 vs. nifedipine; 51.2 ± 18.9, P = 0.113). Adverse maternal and perinatal effects did not differ in the study groups.

CONCLUSION

Oral nifedipine and intravenous hydralazine showed comparable efficacy in the BP control in the severe hypertensive disorders of pregnancy without significant difference in adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. However, further studies are required to explore the role of these drugs in BP control during hypertensive emergencies in pregnancy.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: (Identification number: NCT04435210).

摘要

背景

尽管有有效的降压药物,但关于治疗妊娠高血压急症的最佳降压药物的证据质量仍然很差。

目的

本研究旨在比较口服硝苯地平和静脉注射肼屈嗪控制重度妊娠高血压血压的疗效和副作用。

材料和方法

对 78 例(≥28 周妊娠)重度高血压孕妇进行了一项开放标签、平行、随机、对照试验。重度高血压定义为收缩压 160mmHg 或以上和/或舒张压 110mmHg 或以上。他们被随机(1:1 比例)给予口服硝苯地平 20mg 或静脉注射肼屈嗪 10mg,每 30min 一次,最多 5 次,直至达到目标血压 140-150mmHg 收缩压和 90-100mmHg 舒张压。如果主要治疗失败,则给予静脉拉贝洛尔。主要观察指标是达到目标血压所需的剂量数。次要观察指标是达到理想血压所需的时间、母亲的不良反应和围产儿结局。

结果

两组研究对象的社会人口统计学特征无差异。控制血压所需的平均剂量(硝苯地平;1.4±0.6 与肼屈嗪;1.7±0.5,P=0.008)硝苯地平组较低。两组控制血压所需的时间(分钟)相似(肼屈嗪;43.7±19.7 与硝苯地平;51.2±18.9,P=0.113)。两组母婴不良和围产儿结局无差异。

结论

口服硝苯地平和静脉注射肼屈嗪在控制妊娠重度高血压疾病的血压方面疗效相当,母婴不良和围产儿结局无显著差异。然而,需要进一步的研究来探讨这些药物在妊娠高血压急症期间控制血压的作用。

临床试验.gov:(识别号:NCT04435210)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验