Deng Nian-Jia, Xian-Yu Chen-Yang, Han Rui-Zheng, Huang Cheng-Yang, Ma Yu-Tong, Li Hui-Jun, Gao Teng-Yu, Liu Xin, Zhang Chao
Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China.
Department of Ultrasound, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Jan 9;13:1092501. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1092501. eCollection 2022.
To evaluate the efficacy of different pharmacologic treatment for severe hypertension during pregnancy. Two reviewers searched Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMbase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized clinical trials from the establishment of the database to 15 July 2021 that were eligible for inclusion and analyzed the pharmaceuticals used for severe hypertension in pregnancy. 29 relevant trials with 2,521 participants were involved. Compared with diazoxide in rate of achieving target blood pressure, other pharmaceuticals, including epoprostenol (RR:1.58, 95%CI:1.01-2.47), hydralazine\dihydralazine (RR:1.57, 95%CI:1.07-2.31), ketanserin (RR:1.67, 95%CI:1.09-2.55), labetalol (RR:1.54, 95%CI:1.04-2.28), nifedipine (RR:1.54, 95%CI:1.04-2.29), and urapidil (RR:1.57, 95%CI:1.00-2.47), were statistically significant in the rate of achieving target blood pressure. According to the SUCRA, diazoxide showed the best therapeutic effect, followed by nicardipine, nifedipine, labetalol, and nitroglycerine. The three pharmaceuticals with the worst therapeutic effect were ketanserin, hydralazine, and urapidil. It is worth noting that the high ranking of the top two pharmaceuticals, including diazoxide and nicardipine, comes from extremely low sample sizes. Other outcomes were reported in the main text. This comprehensive network meta-analysis demonstrated that the nifedipine should be recommended as a strategy for blood pressure management in pregnant women with severe hypertension. Moreover, the conventional pharmaceuticals, including labetalol and hydralazine, showed limited efficacy. However, it was important to note that the instability of hydralazine reducing blood pressure and the high benefit of labetalol with high dosages intakes should also be of concern to clinicians.
为评估不同药物治疗方案对妊娠期重度高血压的疗效。两名研究者检索了Ovid MEDLINE、Ovid EMbase和Cochrane图书馆,查找从数据库建立至2021年7月15日符合纳入标准的随机临床试验,并分析了用于妊娠期重度高血压的药物。共纳入29项相关试验,涉及2521名参与者。与二氮嗪相比,在达到目标血压的比率方面,其他药物,包括依前列醇(RR:1.58,95%CI:1.01 - 2.47)、肼屈嗪/双肼屈嗪(RR:1.57,95%CI:1.07 - 2.31)、酮色林(RR:1.67,95%CI:1.09 - 2.55)、拉贝洛尔(RR:1.54,95%CI:1.04 - 2.28)、硝苯地平(RR:1.54,95%CI:1.04 - 2.29)和乌拉地尔(RR:1.57,95%CI:1.00 - 2.47),在达到目标血压的比率上具有统计学意义。根据累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA),二氮嗪显示出最佳治疗效果,其次是尼卡地平、硝苯地平、拉贝洛尔和硝酸甘油。治疗效果最差的三种药物是酮色林、肼屈嗪和乌拉地尔。值得注意的是,排名前两位的药物,即二氮嗪和尼卡地平,排名靠前是由于样本量极低。正文报告了其他结果。这项综合网络荟萃分析表明,硝苯地平应被推荐作为妊娠期重度高血压孕妇血压管理的策略。此外,包括拉贝洛尔和肼屈嗪在内的传统药物疗效有限。然而,重要的是要注意到,肼屈嗪降压的不稳定性以及高剂量摄入拉贝洛尔的高获益性也应引起临床医生的关注。