Suppr超能文献

通过对蔗糖的喜好预测对甜菊糖的喜好:饮料背景的影响。

Prediction of stevia liking by sucrose liking: Effects of beverage background.

作者信息

Oleson Stephanie, Murphy Claire

机构信息

Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA.

San Diego State University/University of California San Diego, Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego, CA.

出版信息

Chemosens Percept. 2017 Sep;10(3):49-59. doi: 10.1007/s12078-017-9225-7. Epub 2017 Jul 8.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There is significant concern over the health implications of increased consumption of sugars added to foods and beverages. Understanding the increase in sugar intake, as well as consideration of potential substitutes will require research in multiple domains. Research on hedonic ratings of sucrose suggests that individuals can be classified into two distinct liking profiles: sweet likers and sweet non-likers. However, no known studies have investigated liking for the natural, nonnutritive sweetener, stevia. The present study aimed to investigate the relationship between liking of stevia and sucrose as a function of beverage background.

METHODS

Forty young adults, 20 high concentration and 20 moderate concentration stevia likers, gave intensity and pleasantness ratings for stevia blend and sucrose taste solutions that varied in concentration and background.

RESULTS

The results revealed a significant relationship between stevia blend liking and sucrose liking. The majority of stevia high concentration likers were high concentration sucrose likers. Pleasantness ratings also significantly varied as a function of background: the discrepancy in pleasantness ratings between stevia blend high concentration likers and moderate concentration likers observed in distilled water was attenuated in a citric beverage background.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of high concentration stevia likers were sucrose likers; however, pleasantness ratings also significantly varied as a function of stimulus background.

IMPLICATIONS

Limiting sucrose in the modern diet is an important research area for diabetes and other health issues. The results suggest that perception of pleasantness and sweetness at varying sweetener concentrations is not fully generalizable from one beverage background to another.

摘要

引言

人们对食品和饮料中添加糖的消费量增加对健康的影响极为关注。要了解糖摄入量的增加以及考虑潜在的替代品,需要在多个领域进行研究。关于蔗糖享乐评级的研究表明,个体可分为两种不同的喜好类型:喜甜者和不喜甜者。然而,尚无已知研究调查过对天然非营养甜味剂甜菊糖的喜好。本研究旨在探讨甜菊糖和蔗糖的喜好之间的关系,以及其作为饮料背景的函数。

方法

40名年轻成年人,其中20名是高浓度甜菊糖喜好者,20名是中浓度甜菊糖喜好者,对不同浓度和背景的甜菊糖混合物和蔗糖味觉溶液给出强度和愉悦度评分。

结果

结果显示甜菊糖混合物喜好度与蔗糖喜好度之间存在显著关系。大多数高浓度甜菊糖喜好者也是高浓度蔗糖喜好者。愉悦度评分也因背景不同而有显著差异:在蒸馏水中观察到的高浓度甜菊糖混合物喜好者和中浓度甜菊糖混合物喜好者之间的愉悦度评分差异,在柠檬酸饮料背景中减弱。

结论

大多数高浓度甜菊糖喜好者也是蔗糖喜好者;然而,愉悦度评分也因刺激背景不同而有显著差异。

启示

限制现代饮食中的蔗糖是糖尿病和其他健康问题的一个重要研究领域。结果表明,不同甜味剂浓度下的愉悦度和甜度感知不能完全从一种饮料背景推广到另一种饮料背景。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/361f/7641516/246811b001d7/nihms-891412-f0001.jpg

相似文献

9
Intensity and pleasantness of sucrose taste in patients with winter depression.冬季抑郁症患者蔗糖味觉的强度和愉悦度
Nutr Neurosci. 2015 May;18(4):186-91. doi: 10.1179/1476830514Y.0000000115. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
10
Sweet taste pleasantness is modulated by morphine and naltrexone.甜味的愉悦感受吗啡和纳曲酮调节。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2016 Oct;233(21-22):3711-3723. doi: 10.1007/s00213-016-4403-x. Epub 2016 Aug 18.

本文引用的文献

4
Preference mapping of frozen and fresh raspberries.冷冻和新鲜覆盆子的偏好映射。
J Food Sci. 2013 Jun;78(6):S911-9. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.12125. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
5
Genetic analysis of chemosensory traits in human twins.人类双胞胎的化学感觉特征的遗传分析。
Chem Senses. 2012 Nov;37(9):869-81. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjs070. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
6
Human psychometric and taste receptor responses to steviol glycosides.人对甜菊糖苷的心理测量和味觉受体反应。
J Agric Food Chem. 2012 Jul 11;60(27):6782-93. doi: 10.1021/jf301297n. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
8
Mammalian bitter taste perception.哺乳动物的苦味感知。
Results Probl Cell Differ. 2009;47:203-20. doi: 10.1007/400_2008_5.
9
Development of rebiana, a natural, non-caloric sweetener.莱苞迪苷A(一种天然无热量甜味剂)的开发。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2008 Jul;46 Suppl 7:S75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2008.05.004. Epub 2008 May 16.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验