Establishing Photographic Standards for Facial Transplantation: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

UNLABELLED

Photography provides a means for objective assessment and dissemination of clinical information. The American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) and Plastic Surgery Foundation (PSF) published photography guidelines in 2006 to optimize its clinical use. However, photographic documentation of outcomes in facial transplantation (FT) continues to lack standardization. We therefore appraised the current state of FT photography in the peer-reviewed literature.

METHODS

A PubMed search was conducted from July 2005 to July 2019. Studies containing photographs of partial or full FT recipients were included. Non-English language articles, cadaveric and animal studies, technique papers, and case reports were excluded. Data were extracted from 91 articles. Adherence rates were calculated to determine whether published FT photographs followed ASPS/PSF guidelines. Proposed photographic standards particular to FT were then formulated to guide standardization of practice.

RESULTS

Only 28.6% (26/91) of articles adhered to the photographic conventions of preparation, positioning, and views. Of 162 patient appearances in the 91 articles, 95% (154/162) met the criteria for preparation, 98.8% (160/162) met the criteria for positioning, but only 24.7% (40/162) met the criteria for views.

CONCLUSIONS

Photographic documentation of FT outcomes in the peer-reviewed literature is limited, with inconsistent adherence to ASPS/PSF guidelines. There is substantial deficiency in provision of alternative views, with the majority of publications only depicting the frontal view. FT photography standards should specifically incorporate alternative views, proper lighting and framing, and elimination of distractions, and accommodate for remote patient self-photography. This will promote a transparent and consistent longitudinal evaluation of the surgical results.