• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Caregiver Eligibility for Support Services: Correlates and Consequences for Resource Utilization.照顾者获得支持服务的资格:与资源利用的相关性及其后果。
J Appl Gerontol. 2022 Feb;41(2):515-525. doi: 10.1177/0733464820971134. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
2
Unmet Needs for Information and Support Among Military Caregivers.军事护理人员在信息和支持方面的未满足需求。
Mil Med. 2019 Dec 1;184(11-12):e922-e928. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usz109.
3
A National Examination of Caregiver Use of and Preferences for Support Services: Does Rurality Matter? caregiver 使用和偏好支持服务的全国性调查:农村地区重要吗?
J Aging Health. 2019 Oct;31(9):1652-1670. doi: 10.1177/0898264318786569. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
4
Critically examining diversity in end-of-life family caregiving: implications for equitable caregiver support and Canada's Compassionate Care Benefit.批判性审视临终关怀中的多样性:对公平的护理人员支持和加拿大的关爱福利的影响。
Int J Equity Health. 2012 Nov 1;11:65. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-11-65.
5
Connecting Caregivers to Support: Lessons Learned From the VA Caregiver Support Program.将照顾者联系起来提供支持:从 VA 照顾者支持计划中吸取的经验教训。
J Appl Gerontol. 2020 Apr;39(4):368-376. doi: 10.1177/0733464818825050. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
6
Service preferences among family caregivers of the terminally ill.晚期患者家庭照顾者的服务偏好
J Palliat Med. 2005 Feb;8(1):69-78. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2005.8.69.
7
Exploring how workplace and social policies relate to caregivers' financial strain.探索职场政策和社会政策与照顾者经济压力之间的关系。
J Gerontol Soc Work. 2018 Nov-Dec;61(8):849-866. doi: 10.1080/01634372.2018.1487895. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
8
Effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to support people with dementia living in the community: a systematic review.干预措施对帮助照顾者支持社区中痴呆症患者的有效性:系统评价。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Jun;6(2):137-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2008.00090.x.
9
Caregiving Is a Marathon, Not a Road Race: Reenvisioning Caregiver Support Services in Gynecologic Oncology.照料是一场马拉松,而非一场竞速赛:重新构想妇科肿瘤学中的照护者支持服务。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018 Nov;28(9):1722-1727. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001360.
10
A national survey of caregiver's own experiences and perceptions of U.S. health care system when addressing their health and caring for an older adult.一项关于照顾者在关注自身健康以及照料老年人时,对美国医疗保健系统的自身经历和看法的全国性调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jan 29;21(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06086-z.

引用本文的文献

1
A Qualitative Study Examining Caregivers' Perspectives on Healthcare System Barriers and Facilitators to Foregut Cancer Care.一项定性研究:探究护理人员对前肠癌症护理中医疗系统障碍与促进因素的看法。
J Surg Res. 2025 Jul 30;314:94-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2025.06.071.
2
Caregiver policies in the United States: a systematic review.美国的护理者政策:一项系统综述。
J Public Health Policy. 2025 Mar;46(1):22-37. doi: 10.1057/s41271-024-00529-7. Epub 2024 Nov 17.
3
Building on and tailoring to: Adapting a cancer caregiver psychoeducational intervention for rural settings.基于并调整:为农村环境调整癌症护理者心理教育干预措施。
Cancer Med. 2024 Sep;13(17):e70187. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70187.
4
Closing the Caregiving Gap: Considerations for Pancreatic and Periampullary Cancer Caregivers.弥合照护缺口:胰腺癌和胰周癌照护者的考虑因素。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2023 Aug;19(8):523-525. doi: 10.1200/OP.23.00274. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
5
Caring for aging parents in the last years of life.照顾生命末期的老年父母。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Sep;71(9):2871-2877. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18415. Epub 2023 May 24.
6
Conceptualizing Family Caregivers' Use of Community Support Services: A Scoping Review.概念化家庭照顾者对社区支持服务的使用:范围综述。
Gerontologist. 2024 May 1;64(5). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnad039.
7
Caregiver resource utilization: Intellectual and development disability and dementia.照护者资源利用:智力和发育障碍与痴呆。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2021 Nov;34(6):1468-1476. doi: 10.1111/jar.12889. Epub 2021 Jun 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Accentuate the Positive: The Association Between Informal and Formal Supports and Caregiving Gains.突出积极面:非正式和正式支持与护理获益之间的关联。
J Appl Gerontol. 2021 Jul;40(7):763-771. doi: 10.1177/0733464820914481. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
2
The Effect of National Family Caregiver Support Program Services on Caregiver Burden.国家家庭护老者支持计划服务对护老者负担的影响。
J Appl Gerontol. 2021 Sep;40(9):963-971. doi: 10.1177/0733464819901094. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
3
Facilitating pathways to care: A qualitative study of the self-reported needs and coping skills of caregivers of young adults diagnosed with early psychosis.促进照护途径:一项定性研究报告,探讨了早期精神病诊断的年轻成年患者照顾者的自报需求和应对技能。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Aug;27(4):368-379. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12591. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
4
A Snapshot of Social Support Networks Among Parental Caregivers of Adults with Autism.自闭症成年患者父母照顾者社会支持网络概览
J Autism Dev Disord. 2020 Apr;50(4):1111-1122. doi: 10.1007/s10803-019-04285-6.
5
Informal Caregiving and All-Cause Mortality: A Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Population-Based Studies.非正规照料与全因死亡率:基于人群的纵向研究的荟萃分析。
J Appl Gerontol. 2021 Jul;40(7):781-791. doi: 10.1177/0733464819893603. Epub 2019 Dec 15.
6
Caregiving in the shadows: National analysis of health outcomes and intensity and duration of care among those who care for people with mental illness and for people with developmental disabilities.照料阴影下的人:对照顾精神疾病患者和发育障碍患者的人健康结果、照料强度和持续时间的全国性分析。
Disabil Health J. 2020 Jan;13(1):100837. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2019.100837. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
7
Comparison of financial support for family caregivers of people at the end of life across six countries: A descriptive study.六个国家临终患者家庭照护者经济支持比较:描述性研究。
Palliat Med. 2019 Oct;33(9):1189-1211. doi: 10.1177/0269216319861925. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
8
The Older Americans Act and Family Caregiving: Perspectives from Federal and State Levels.《美国老年人法案》与家庭照料:联邦和州层面的视角
Public Policy Aging Rep. 2019 Jun;29(2):62-66. doi: 10.1093/ppar/prz006. Epub 2019 May 11.
9
Marginal Effects-Quantifying the Effect of Changes in Risk Factors in Logistic Regression Models.边际效应——量化逻辑回归模型中风险因素变化的影响
JAMA. 2019 Apr 2;321(13):1304-1305. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.1954.
10
Connecting Caregivers to Support: Lessons Learned From the VA Caregiver Support Program.将照顾者联系起来提供支持:从 VA 照顾者支持计划中吸取的经验教训。
J Appl Gerontol. 2020 Apr;39(4):368-376. doi: 10.1177/0733464818825050. Epub 2019 Jan 18.

照顾者获得支持服务的资格:与资源利用的相关性及其后果。

Caregiver Eligibility for Support Services: Correlates and Consequences for Resource Utilization.

机构信息

University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Gerontol. 2022 Feb;41(2):515-525. doi: 10.1177/0733464820971134. Epub 2020 Nov 6.

DOI:10.1177/0733464820971134
PMID:33155498
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8099921/
Abstract

Policymakers and community organizations have implemented numerous programs and services to support the more than 40 million family caregivers in the United States. However, the existence of such services is not sufficient to ensure equitable and optimal access and utilization. Using data from the Caregiving in the US study (2015; = 1,185), we estimated that nearly one in five family caregivers do not meet broad eligibility criteria for support services. This resource gap was particularly likely to affect high-priority populations such as those caring for someone with a mental health problem. Furthermore, ineligible caregivers had lower service utilization and increased financial strain. The findings highlight a pattern of vulnerability among caregivers who do not meet broad eligibility criteria for financial support resources. Careful policy consideration is needed to determine how support services should be allocated to maximize caregiver and care recipient outcomes at the population level.

摘要

政策制定者和社区组织已经实施了许多项目和服务,以支持美国超过 4000 万的家庭护理人员。然而,这些服务的存在并不能确保公平和最佳的获取和利用。利用来自“美国护理研究”(2015 年;n=1185)的数据,我们估计,近五分之一的家庭护理人员不符合支持服务的广泛资格标准。这种资源差距特别可能影响到高优先级人群,如照顾有心理健康问题的人。此外,不符合条件的护理人员的服务利用率较低,经济压力较大。这些发现突显了不符合广泛经济支持资源资格标准的护理人员的脆弱性模式。需要仔细考虑政策,以确定如何分配支持服务,以最大限度地提高护理人员和护理接受者在人群层面的结果。