• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

caregiver 使用和偏好支持服务的全国性调查:农村地区重要吗?

A National Examination of Caregiver Use of and Preferences for Support Services: Does Rurality Matter?

机构信息

1 University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.

出版信息

J Aging Health. 2019 Oct;31(9):1652-1670. doi: 10.1177/0898264318786569. Epub 2018 Jul 6.

DOI:10.1177/0898264318786569
PMID:29978742
Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess rural-urban differences in caregiver use of and preferences for support services. Using the 2015 Caregiving in the U.S. survey data ( = 1,389), we analyzed rural-urban differences by caregiver residence in use of and preferences for support services. We analyzed bivariate differences in service use and preferences, as well as in sociodemographic and caregiving relationship characteristics. We also assessed the correlates of service use using stratified ordered logistic regression models. Approximately one third of all caregivers had used no supportive services, with few differences in service use and preference by location. For caregivers in both locations, having more financial strain was associated with greater use of services. This article identifies broad needs for caregiver support across all geographic locations. Targeted efforts should be made to ensure access to supportive services accounting for unique barriers by geography.

摘要

本研究旨在评估城乡之间看护者使用和偏好支持服务的差异。利用 2015 年“美国看护状况调查”数据(n=1389),我们根据看护者的居住地点分析了使用和偏好支持服务方面的城乡差异。我们分析了服务使用和偏好、社会人口学和照护关系特征方面的差异,还使用分层有序逻辑回归模型评估了服务使用的相关因素。大约三分之一的所有看护者都没有使用任何支持性服务,不同地点之间的服务使用和偏好差异很小。对于两个地点的看护者来说,经济压力越大,使用服务的可能性就越大。本文确定了所有地理区域看护者支持的广泛需求。应根据地理位置的独特障碍,有针对性地努力确保获得支持服务。

相似文献

1
A National Examination of Caregiver Use of and Preferences for Support Services: Does Rurality Matter? caregiver 使用和偏好支持服务的全国性调查:农村地区重要吗?
J Aging Health. 2019 Oct;31(9):1652-1670. doi: 10.1177/0898264318786569. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
2
Rural-urban and regional variations in aspects of caregiving, support services and caregiver health in the USA: evidence from a national survey.美国在照顾、支持服务和照顾者健康方面的城乡和地区差异:来自全国调查的证据。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 7;14(10):e081581. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081581.
3
Rural-Urban Difference in Workplace Supports and Impacts for Employed Caregivers.城乡就业护工工作场所支持和影响的差异。
J Rural Health. 2019 Jan;35(1):49-57. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12309. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
4
Rural-urban differences in unpaid caregivers of adults.成人无薪照料者的城乡差异。
Rural Remote Health. 2017 Nov;17(4):4351. doi: 10.22605/RRH4351. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
5
Comparing the experiences of rural and urban family caregivers of the terminally ill.比较农村和城市临终患者家庭照料者的经历。
Rural Remote Health. 2013 Jan-Mar;13(1):2250. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
6
Unmet Needs for Information and Support Among Military Caregivers.军事护理人员在信息和支持方面的未满足需求。
Mil Med. 2019 Dec 1;184(11-12):e922-e928. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usz109.
7
A comparative study to identify factors of caregiver burden between baby boomers and post baby boomers: a secondary analysis of a US online caregiver survey.对婴儿潮一代和后婴儿潮一代照护者负担的因素进行比较研究:对美国在线照护者调查的二次分析。
BMC Public Health. 2018 May 2;18(1):579. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5488-4.
8
Rural-urban differences in family and paid caregiving utilization in the United States: Findings from the Cornell National Social Survey.美国城乡家庭和有偿护理利用的差异:康奈尔国家社会调查的结果。
J Rural Health. 2022 Sep;38(4):689-695. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12664. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
9
[Evaluation of gender differences of family caregivers with reference to the mode of caregiving at home and caregiver distress in Japan].[参照日本家庭护理模式及护理者困扰对家庭护理者性别差异的评估]
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2004 Apr;51(4):240-51.
10
We Are Caregivers: Social Identity Is Associated with Lower Perceived Stress among Rural Informal Caregivers.我们是照顾者:社会认同与农村非正式照顾者较低的压力知觉有关。
Can J Aging. 2019 Mar;38(1):59-75. doi: 10.1017/S0714980818000430. Epub 2018 Nov 8.

引用本文的文献

1
"Diagnose & Adios": Multi-Perspective Insights on Formal Service Use in Dementia Family Caregivers.“诊断与告别”:痴呆症家庭照顾者正式服务使用情况的多视角洞察
Gerontologist. 2025 May 10;65(6). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaf081.
2
Building on and tailoring to: Adapting a cancer caregiver psychoeducational intervention for rural settings.基于并调整:为农村环境调整癌症护理者心理教育干预措施。
Cancer Med. 2024 Sep;13(17):e70187. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70187.
3
Conceptualizing Family Caregivers' Use of Community Support Services: A Scoping Review.
概念化家庭照顾者对社区支持服务的使用:范围综述。
Gerontologist. 2024 May 1;64(5). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnad039.
4
Family Caregivers in Rural Appalachia Caring for Older Relatives With Dementia: Predictors of Service Use.美国阿巴拉契亚农村地区照顾患有痴呆症老年亲属的家庭照顾者:服务使用的预测因素
Innov Aging. 2021 Dec 22;6(1):igab055. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igab055. eCollection 2022.
5
Dementia Family Caregiving in Rural Appalachia: A Sociocultural Model of Care Decisions and Service Use.农村阿巴拉契亚的痴呆症家庭护理:护理决策和服务使用的社会文化模型。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2022 Jun 1;77(6):1094-1104. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbab236.
6
Rural-Urban Differences in Caregiver Burden Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic among a National Sample of Informal Caregivers.新冠疫情期间全国范围内非正式照料者样本中城乡照料者负担差异
Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2021 Jun 17;7:23337214211025124. doi: 10.1177/23337214211025124. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
7
Caregiver resource utilization: Intellectual and development disability and dementia.照护者资源利用:智力和发育障碍与痴呆。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2021 Nov;34(6):1468-1476. doi: 10.1111/jar.12889. Epub 2021 Jun 14.
8
Improvements of Disability Outcomes in CAPABLE Older Adults Differ by Financial Strain Status.有经济压力的 CAPABLE 老年群体的残疾结局改善情况存在差异。
J Appl Gerontol. 2022 Feb;41(2):471-477. doi: 10.1177/0733464820975551. Epub 2020 Dec 2.