Department of Nutrition and Food Studies, College of Education and Human Services, Montclair State University, 1 Normal Avenue, Montclair, NJ07043, USA.
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Sep;24(13):4268-4276. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020004474. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
To determine whether dietetic students would report a change in their public service motivation (PSM) following a community nutrition service learning (SL) course, and whether the SL model (charity v. project) influences this change differently.
Using a pretest-posttest, nonequivalent groups quasi-experimental design, this study compared students' PSM at the beginning and end of a 15-week college-level course. PSM and four component dimensions (attraction to public policy, commitment to public interest, compassion and self-sacrifice) were measured via electronic survey using the PSM scale. Average PSM scores were compared between and within the charity and project groups using independent samples and paired sample t tests, respectively. ANCOVA assessed the effect of SL model on post-survey scores, controlling for pre-survey scores.
Public university in northeastern United States.
Dietetic students enrolled in six sections of the same undergraduate community nutrition SL course. Students were placed by section in either charity (n 59) or project (n 52) SL experiences and required to complete 14 h in this role.
Mean PSM total scores increased between pre-survey and post-survey (3·50 v. 3·58; P = 0·001). Students reported small increases in three PSM dimensions: commitment to public interest, compassion and self-sacrifice (all P ≤ 0·01). Holding pre-scores constant, the charity group reported a higher attraction to public policy post-score, while the project group reported a higher self-sacrifice post-score (both P < 0·05).
Educators should consider adopting SL methods into curricular offerings to enhance students' motivation for public service.
确定营养专业学生在参加社区营养服务学习(SL)课程后,其公共服务动机(PSM)是否会发生变化,以及 SL 模式(慈善与项目)是否会以不同的方式影响这种变化。
本研究采用前测后测、非等效组准实验设计,比较了学生在为期 15 周的大学课程开始和结束时的 PSM。通过电子调查使用 PSM 量表测量 PSM 及四个组成维度(对公共政策的吸引力、对公共利益的承诺、同情心和自我牺牲)。慈善组和项目组分别采用独立样本和配对样本 t 检验比较组间和组内的平均 PSM 得分。协方差分析(ANCOVA)评估了 SL 模式对后测得分的影响,同时控制了前测得分。
美国东北部一所公立大学。
参加同一门本科社区营养 SL 课程的六组营养学生。学生根据分组被安排在慈善组(n 59)或项目组(n 52)的 SL 体验中,并要求在该角色中完成 14 小时的工作。
PSM 总分从预调查到后调查呈上升趋势(3.50 比 3.58;P = 0.001)。学生报告在三个 PSM 维度上有较小的增加:对公共利益的承诺、同情心和自我牺牲(均 P ≤ 0.01)。在保持前测分数不变的情况下,慈善组报告后测时对公共政策的吸引力更高,而项目组报告后测时自我牺牲得分更高(均 P < 0.05)。
教育者应考虑将 SL 方法纳入课程,以增强学生对公共服务的动机。