Center for Health Technology and Services Research, CINTESIS, Porto, Portugal.
Health Information and Decision Sciences Department (MEDCIDS), Faculty of Medicine of University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021 May 1;46(9):E534-E541. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003769.
Survey study.
Assess practices and opinions of spine specialists from Europe and North America on orthosis use in adult patients with acute thoracolumbar (TL) fractures. Evaluate cost of the devices.
Although orthosis are traditionally used in conservative treatment of TL fractures, recent systematic reviews showed no benefit in patient's outcomes.
A search for contact authors with publications on spine fractures from all European and North American countries was performed. An online questionnaire was sent on demographic data, practice setting, mean number of fractures treated, use of orthosis upon choice for conservative treatment, and average orthosis cost. Data was analyzed based in world regions, economic rank of the country, and health expenditure.
We received 130 answers, from 28 European and five North American countries. Most responders had more than 9 years of practice and worked at a public hospital. 6.2% did not prescribe a brace in any patient with acute TL fractures conservatively treated and 11.5% brace all patients. In a scale from 1 to 5, 21 considered that there is no/low benefit (1) and 14 that bracing is essential (5), with a mean of 3.18. Europeans use orthosis less commonly than North Americans (P < 0.05). Orthosis mean cost was $611.4 ± 716.0, significantly higher in North America compared with Europe and in high income, when compared with upper middle income countries (both P < 0.05). Although hospital costs were not evaluated, orthosis is costlier when it involves admission of the patient (P < 0.05). An increase in orthosis cost associated with higher gross domestic product (GDP) per capita and higher health expenditure was found.
More than 90% of spine specialists still use orthosis in conservative treatment of adult patients with acute TL fractures. Orthosis cost vary significantly between continents, and it is influenced by the country's economy.Level of Evidence: 4.
调查研究。
评估来自欧洲和北美的脊柱专家在治疗成人急性胸腰椎(TL)骨折患者时使用矫形器的实践和意见。评估设备的成本。
尽管矫形器在 TL 骨折的保守治疗中传统上被使用,但最近的系统评价显示对患者结局没有益处。
对所有欧洲和北美国家发表过脊柱骨折相关文献的联系作者进行搜索。在线问卷调查了人口统计学数据、实践环境、治疗的平均骨折数量、选择保守治疗时使用矫形器的情况以及平均矫形器成本。根据世界区域、国家经济排名和卫生支出进行数据分析。
我们收到了来自 28 个欧洲国家和 5 个北美国家的 130 份回复。大多数回复者的从业时间超过 9 年,在公立医院工作。6.2%的医生在任何保守治疗的急性 TL 骨折患者中都不开具支具,11.5%的医生给所有患者都开具支具。在 1 到 5 的评分中,21 人认为没有/低益处(1),14 人认为支具是必要的(5),平均得分为 3.18。欧洲人比北美人更不常使用矫形器(P<0.05)。北美国家的矫形器平均成本为 611.4±716.0 美元,明显高于欧洲国家,而在高收入国家,与中上收入国家相比,成本也更高(均 P<0.05)。尽管未评估医院成本,但当涉及到患者住院时,矫形器的费用更高(P<0.05)。发现矫形器成本与人均国内生产总值(GDP)和更高的卫生支出呈正相关。
超过 90%的脊柱专家在治疗成人急性 TL 骨折患者时仍使用矫形器进行保守治疗。矫形器的成本在欧洲和北美之间差异显著,并且受到国家经济的影响。
4 级。