Suppr超能文献

胸腰椎爆裂骨折的治疗:一项比较支具与不使用支具的随机临床试验的长期随访

Treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: extended follow-up of a randomized clinical trial comparing orthosis versus no orthosis.

作者信息

Urquhart Jennifer C, Alrehaili Osama A, Fisher Charles G, Fleming Alyssa, Rasoulinejad Parham, Gurr Kevin, Bailey Stewart I, Siddiqi Fawaz, Bailey Christopher S

机构信息

Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, The University of Western Ontario, Lawson Health Research Institute, and London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario; and.

Vancouver Hospital and Health Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Jul;27(1):42-47. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.SPINE161031. Epub 2017 Apr 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE A multicenter, prospective, randomized equivalence trial comparing a thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO) to no orthosis (NO) in the treatment of acute AO Type A3 thoracolumbar burst fractures was recently conducted and demonstrated that the two treatments following an otherwise similar management protocol are equivalent at 3 months postinjury. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether there was a difference in long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes between the patients treated with and those treated without a TLSO. Here, the authors present the 5- to 10-year outcomes (mean follow-up 7.9 ± 1.1 years) of the patients at a single site from the original multicenter trial. METHODS Between July 2002 and January 2009, a total of 96 subjects were enrolled in the primary trial and randomized to two groups: TLSO or NO. Subjects were enrolled if they had an AO Type A3 burst fracture between T-10 and L-3 within the previous 72 hours, kyphotic deformity < 35°, no neurological deficit, and an age of 16-60 years old. The present study represents a subset of those patients: 16 in the TLSO group and 20 in the NO group. The primary outcome measure was the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) score at the last 5- to 10-year follow-up. Secondary outcome measures included kyphosis, satisfaction, the Numeric Rating Scale for back pain, and the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) Mental and Physical Component Summary (MCS and PCS) scores. In the original study, outcome measures were administered at admission and 2 and 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months, and 1 and 2 years after injury; in the present extended follow-up study, the outcome measures were administered 5-10 years postinjury. Treatment comparison between patients in the TLSO group and those in the NO group was performed at the latest available follow-up, and the time-weighted average treatment effect was determined using a mixed-effects model of longitudinal regression for repeated measures averaged over all time periods. Missing data were assumed to be missing at random and were replaced with a set of plausible values derived using a multiple imputation procedure. RESULTS The RMDQ score at 5-10 years postinjury was 3.6 ± 0.9 (mean ± SE) for the TLSO group and 4.8 ± 1.5 for the NO group (p = 0.486, 95% CI -2.3 to 4.8). Average kyphosis was 18.3° ± 2.2° for the TLSO group and 18.6° ± 3.8° for the NO group (p = 0.934, 95% CI -7.8 to 8.5). No differences were found between the NO and TLSO groups with time-weighted average treatment effects for RMDQ 1.9 (95% CI -1.5 to 5.2), for PCS -2.5 (95% CI -7.9 to 3.0), for MCS -1.2 (95% CI -6.7 to 4.2) and for average pain 0.9 (95% CI -0.5 to 2.2). CONCLUSIONS Compared with patients treated with a TLSO, patients treated using early mobilization without orthosis maintain similar pain relief and improvement in function for 5-10 years.

摘要

目的 最近开展了一项多中心、前瞻性、随机等效性试验,比较胸腰骶矫形器(TLSO)与不使用矫形器(NO)治疗急性AO A3型胸腰椎爆裂骨折的效果,结果表明在其他管理方案相似的情况下,两种治疗方法在伤后3个月时效果相当。本研究的目的是确定接受TLSO治疗的患者与未接受TLSO治疗的患者在长期临床和影像学结果上是否存在差异。在此,作者展示了来自原多中心试验中单个研究点患者的5至10年随访结果(平均随访7.9±1.1年)。

方法 在2002年7月至2009年1月期间,共有96名受试者纳入了原试验并随机分为两组:TLSO组或NO组。纳入标准为:在过去72小时内发生T10至L3节段的AO A3型爆裂骨折、后凸畸形<35°、无神经功能缺损且年龄在16至60岁之间。本研究是这些患者中的一个子集:TLSO组16例,NO组20例。主要结局指标是在最后一次5至10年随访时的罗兰·莫里斯残疾问卷(RMDQ)评分。次要结局指标包括后凸畸形、满意度、背痛数字评定量表以及12项简短健康调查问卷(SF - 12)的心理和生理成分总结(MCS和PCS)评分。在原研究中,结局指标在入院时、伤后2周和6周、3个月和6个月以及1年和2年时进行评估;在本次延长随访研究中,结局指标在伤后5至10年时进行评估。对TLSO组和NO组患者进行治疗比较时采用最新的随访数据,并使用纵向回归的混合效应模型确定时间加权平均治疗效果,该模型对所有时间段的重复测量进行平均。假设缺失数据为随机缺失,并使用多重填补程序得出的一组合理值进行替换。

结果 TLSO组伤后5至10年的RMDQ评分为3.6±0.9(均值±标准误),NO组为4.8±1.5(p = 0.486,95%可信区间 - 2.3至4.8)。TLSO组平均后凸畸形为18.3°±2.2°,NO组为18.6°±3.8°(p = 0.934,95%可信区间 - 7.8至8.5)。对于RMDQ,NO组和TLSO组在时间加权平均治疗效果上无差异,差值为1.9(95%可信区间 - 1.5至5.2);对于PCS,差值为 - 2.5(95%可信区间 - 7.9至3.0);对于MCS,差值为 - 1.2(95%可信区间 - 6.7至4.2);对于平均疼痛,差值为0.9(95%可信区间 - 0.5至2.2)。

结论 与接受TLSO治疗的患者相比,早期不使用矫形器进行活动治疗的患者在5至10年内维持了相似的疼痛缓解和功能改善。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验