Fisher-Thompson Donna
Niagara University.
Infancy. 2017 Mar;22(2):190-222. doi: 10.1111/infa.12154. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
Data from 72 infants, tested using a serial paired-comparison paradigm, were analyzed to better understand infant novelty preferences. Infants between the ages of 15 and 26 weeks were tested in three studies with familiar stimuli displayed adjacent to novel stimuli on each trial. Differences in look duration, look number, and gaze shifts directed at novel versus familiar stimuli were assessed to measure their contributions to group and individual novelty preferences. Infants produced longer looks for novel stimuli in all three studies, and stimulus differences in look duration accounted for more than 50% of the variability in individual novelty preferences. Infants that produced more looks to novel rather than familiar stimuli did not produce overall novelty preferences unless they also looked longer at novel stimuli. Gaze shift patterns did not predict individual novelty preferences, and novel stimuli did not determine where infants looked. The infants' visual exploration was constrained by memories for the direction of the previous look as well as by the attention-holding features of novel stimuli.
对72名婴儿的数据进行了分析,这些婴儿采用系列配对比较范式进行测试,以更好地了解婴儿对新奇事物的偏好。在三项研究中对15至26周龄的婴儿进行了测试,每次试验中,熟悉的刺激与新奇的刺激相邻呈现。评估了对新奇刺激与熟悉刺激的注视持续时间、注视次数和目光转移的差异,以衡量它们对群体和个体新奇偏好的影响。在所有三项研究中,婴儿对新奇刺激的注视时间更长,注视持续时间的刺激差异占个体新奇偏好变异性的50%以上。比起熟悉刺激,对新奇刺激注视次数更多的婴儿并没有产生总体的新奇偏好,除非他们对新奇刺激的注视时间也更长。目光转移模式并不能预测个体的新奇偏好,新奇刺激也不能决定婴儿注视的位置。婴儿的视觉探索受到前一次注视方向的记忆以及新奇刺激的注意力保持特征的限制。