School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goias, Avenida Universitária esquina com 1ª Avenida, s/n. Setor Universitário, Goiânia, Goiás, CEP 74605-020, Brazil.
Centre for Public Health, Queen's University, School of Medicine Dentistry & Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Clinical Science Block B, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, BT12 6BJ, United Kingdom.
J Dent. 2020 Dec;103:103521. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103521. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
Denture fracture is one of the most common complications in prosthodontics and implant overdentures are reported to be at higher risk of fractures. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the incidence and factors associated with the occurrence of fractures in patients treated with a single implant mandibular overdenture (SIMO) opposed by a conventional maxillary complete denture.
A cohort of 152 patients, 65.1% female and 34.9% male, mean age 65.4 ± 8.5 years, were prospectively followed-up for a minimum of 1 year and up to 6.7 years. Patients received a single midline mandibular implant with a retention system incorporated in the overdenture: Straumann ball abutment and gold elliptical matrix (n = 37), Neodent ball/nylon matrix (n = 83), or Neodent Equator/nylon matrix (n = 32). Fracture was defined as a complete separation of denture parts and classified as midline fracture (over the implant region), or elsewhere. No metal reinforcement was incorporated into the overdenture. Incidence rates, life table analysis, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression were used for data analysis.
Overdenture fractures occurred in 49 patients (32.2% incidence), with repeated fractures in 16 patients. The majority of fractures were associated with function (42.6%) or due to the overdenture being dropped (36.8%). Overall incidence density was 0.14 fracture/patient/year. The risk of fracture was associated with the duration of the overdenture use (HR = 0.84; 95%CI = 0.71-0.99).
Midline denture fracture was a common complication in patients receiving SIMO treatment regardless of the implant / retention system. The use of metal reinforcement may be considered to reduce the risk of recurrent fractures.
This clinical prospective study showed that single-implant mandibular overdentures are at high risk of midline fractures. Proper post-insertion monitoring and the identification and management of patient's individual risk factors are essential for the successful treatment in the long-term.
义齿折裂是口腔修复学中最常见的并发症之一,而种植覆盖义齿被认为更容易发生折裂。因此,本研究旨在评估采用单个下颌种植覆盖义齿(SIMO)修复的患者中,常规上颌全口义齿对抗时义齿折裂的发生率及相关因素。
对 152 例患者进行前瞻性随访,随访时间至少 1 年,最长 6.7 年。患者均接受了单个中线下颌种植体,种植体上附有固位系统,其中 Straumann 球基台和金椭圆基台(n = 37)、Neodent 球/尼龙基台(n = 83)或 Neodent 赤道/尼龙基台(n = 32)。义齿折裂定义为义齿各部分完全分离,并分为中线折裂(发生在种植体区域)或其他部位。义齿未添加金属增强材料。采用发生率、寿命表分析、Kaplan-Meier 和 Cox 回归进行数据分析。
49 例患者(32.2%的发生率)发生义齿折裂,16 例患者发生重复折裂。大多数折裂与功能有关(42.6%)或由于义齿掉落(36.8%)。总体折裂发生率密度为 0.14 例/患者/年。义齿折裂的风险与义齿使用时间有关(HR = 0.84;95%CI = 0.71-0.99)。
中线义齿折裂是接受 SIMO 治疗的患者常见的并发症,与种植体/固位系统无关。使用金属增强材料可能有助于降低反复折裂的风险。
本临床前瞻性研究表明,单个下颌种植体覆盖义齿中线折裂风险较高。适当的植入后监测以及识别和管理患者的个体危险因素是长期成功治疗的关键。