Suppr超能文献

单颗与两颗牙种植体支持的下颌覆盖义齿:功能、患者满意度、口腔健康相关生活质量及治疗成功率的比较

Single versus two dental implants retained mandibular over dentures: comparison of function, patient satisfaction, oral health-related quality of life and success of treatment.

作者信息

Jayasinghe Rasika Manori, Attygalla Manjula, Fonseka Manil Christopher Nishan, Abeysundara Sachith P, Thilakumara Indika Priyanthi, Jayasinghe Ruwan Duminda

机构信息

Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Sciences, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.

Department of OMF Surgery, Faculty of Dental Sciences, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.

出版信息

BMC Res Notes. 2024 Dec 20;17(1):374. doi: 10.1186/s13104-024-07040-y.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of prosthetic rehabilitation of edentulous patients using conventional complete dentures (CD), single median dental implant retained over dentures (SIMOD) with over dentures retained by two dental implants (TIMOD).

METHODS

Thirty completely edentulous patients (fifteen each arm) presented to the Faculty of Dental Sciences, University of Peradeniya were randomly selected for the SIMOD or TIMOD groups. Patients were initially provided with CD. Surgical implant placement and prosthetic procedures were conducted at the Faculty of Dental Sciences. Osseointergration was confirmed, healing caps and then ball attachments were fixed on the implants. Clinical outcome was assessed by clinician, patient, and oral health related quality of life (OHRQOL) using OHIP-14 scale. Data were analyzed using Minitab P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant level.

RESULTS

Patient comfort, esthetics, chewing, speech, general satisfaction, denture retention, stability, and support with TIMOD & SIMOD had been significantly increased than CD (p < 0.05) at 3, 6 months, and 1 year review. OHIP-14 scale showed statistically significant improved oral health related quality of life with SIMOD and TIMOD compared to CD.

CONCLUSION

SIMOD & TIMOD have improved outcome assessed by the patient and clinician and OHRQOL of the individual than CD. SIMOD can also be considered for successful management of completely edentulous patients.

摘要

目的

比较使用传统全口义齿(CD)、单颗中位牙种植体支持覆盖义齿(SIMOD)与两颗牙种植体支持覆盖义齿(TIMOD)对无牙患者进行修复治疗的效果。

方法

随机选取30例就诊于佩拉德尼亚大学牙科学院的无牙患者(每组15例),分为SIMOD组或TIMOD组。患者最初佩戴CD。种植体植入手术及修复程序在牙科学院进行。确认骨结合后,在种植体上固定愈合帽,然后安装球帽附着体。由临床医生、患者以及使用OHIP - 14量表评估口腔健康相关生活质量(OHRQOL)来评价临床结果。使用Minitab进行数据分析,P < 0.05被视为具有统计学意义。

结果

在3个月、6个月和1年复查时,与CD相比,TIMOD和SIMOD在患者舒适度、美观度、咀嚼功能、言语功能、总体满意度、义齿固位、稳定性及支持方面均有显著提高(p < 0.05)。OHIP - 14量表显示,与CD相比,SIMOD和TIMOD在口腔健康相关生活质量方面有统计学意义的改善。

结论

与CD相比,SIMOD和TIMOD在患者和临床医生评估结果以及个体的OHRQOL方面均有改善。SIMOD也可被视为成功治疗无牙患者的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f2c/11662757/0e0a4d5e4cbc/13104_2024_7040_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验