Orthopaedic Research Institute, St. George Hospital Campus, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Orthopaedic Research Institute, St. George Hospital Campus, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Aug;30(8):1907-1914. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.09.038. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
Retear or nonhealing of a surgically repaired rotator cuff is common, but the determinants of retear are poorly understood. We aimed to determine the relationship between preoperative and intraoperative factors and retear rate following rotator cuff repair and to formulate a predictive model based on this relationship, including any interaction effects between tear size, patient age, and surgical experience in contributing to the retear rate.
We performed a post hoc analysis of prospectively collected data from 1962 consecutive patients who underwent a primary arthroscopic single-row rotator cuff repair performed by the senior author from 2007 through 2018 and postoperatively returned for 6-month follow-up ultrasonography.
Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed anteroposterior tear length to be the most important independent predictor of retear (Wald statistic, 90; P < .001). Other independent predictors included case number (Wald statistic, 59; P < .001), patient age at surgery (Wald statistic, 30; P < .001), and type of hospital (public vs. private) (Wald statistic, 17; P < .001). The data indicated that following rotator cuff repair, there was a 4-fold increase in the retear rate as the anteroposterior tear size increased from 1 cm to 3 cm; a 8-fold decrease when comparing case number 1000 with case number 3000; a 2-fold increase as patient age increased from 50 years to 70 years; and a 3-fold increase when comparing surgery performed in a public hospital vs. a private hospital. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.81 (95% confidence interval, 0.78-0.84), indicating that our equation could predict 81% of retears.
Anteroposterior tear length was the most important independent predictor of retear or nonhealing. Other predictive factors included case number, patient age at surgery, and hospital type. The predictive effect of anteroposterior tear length, patient age, and case number in contributing to retear was additive. Our regression equation may be used to calculate patient rotator cuff retear risk at 6 months after repair.
外科修复后的肩袖再撕裂或不愈合很常见,但再撕裂的决定因素仍不清楚。我们旨在确定术前和术中因素与肩袖修复后再撕裂率之间的关系,并基于这种关系制定一个预测模型,包括撕裂大小、患者年龄和手术经验之间的任何相互作用效应对再撕裂率的影响。
我们对 1962 例连续患者进行了回顾性分析,这些患者均于 2007 年至 2018 年期间由资深作者行初次关节镜下单排肩袖修复术,术后均行 6 个月的超声随访。
多元逻辑回归分析显示,前后撕裂长度是再撕裂的最重要独立预测因素(Wald 统计量,90;P<.001)。其他独立预测因素包括手术例数(Wald 统计量,59;P<.001)、手术时患者年龄(Wald 统计量,30;P<.001)和医院类型(公立与私立)(Wald 统计量,17;P<.001)。数据表明,在肩袖修复后,随着前后撕裂大小从 1 厘米增加到 3 厘米,再撕裂率增加了 4 倍;与手术例数 3000 相比,手术例数 1000 时再撕裂率降低了 8 倍;与 50 岁相比,70 岁时再撕裂率增加了 2 倍;与公立医院相比,私立医院时再撕裂率增加了 3 倍。接受者操作特征曲线下面积为 0.81(95%置信区间,0.78-0.84),表明我们的方程可以预测 81%的再撕裂。
前后撕裂长度是再撕裂或不愈合的最重要独立预测因素。其他预测因素包括手术例数、手术时患者年龄和医院类型。前后撕裂长度、患者年龄和手术例数对再撕裂的预测作用是相加的。我们的回归方程可用于计算患者肩袖修复后 6 个月时的再撕裂风险。