• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“机器人手术疲劳?”——病例顺序对机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术中手术切缘阳性的影响

"Robotic fatigue?" - The impact of case order on positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

作者信息

Bukavina Laura, Mishra Kirtishri, Mahran Amr, Fernstrum Austin, Ray Al, Markt Sarah, Schumacher Fredrick, Conroy Britt, Abouassaly Robert, MacLennan Gregory, Smith Garrett, Ferry Elizabeth, Wong Daniel, Lotan Yair, Chaparala Hemant, Sharp David, Alazem Kareem, Moinzadeh Alireza, Adamic Brittany, Zagaja Gregory, Kang Puneet, Lawry Holly, Lee Benjamin, Calaway Adam, Ponsky Lee

机构信息

Urology Institute, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH; Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH.

Urology Institute, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH.

出版信息

Urol Oncol. 2021 Jun;39(6):365.e17-365.e23. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.10.071. Epub 2020 Nov 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.10.071
PMID:33160844
Abstract

PURPOSE

Multiple robotic-assisted surgeries are often performed within a single operating day; however, the impact of this practice on patient outcomes has not been examined. We aim to determine whether outcomes for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) differed when performed sequentially.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A multi-institutional, retrospective cohort study was conducted involving a total of 8 academic centers between years 2015 and 2018. Participants were adult males undergoing RALP for localized prostate cancer on operative days in which 2 RALP cases were performed sequentially by the same resident-attending team. The primary outcome of the study was presence of positive surgical margin (PSM). Secondary outcomes were lymph node yield, operative time, and estimated blood loss. The primary analysis was a random effects meta-analysis model for PSM.

RESULTS

Overall, 898 RALP cases (449 sequential pairs) were included in the study. There was no significant difference in PSM rate (27.2% vs. 30.3%, P= 0.338) between first and second case groups, respectively. Utilizing random effects meta-analysis, the second case cohort had no increased risk of PSM (OR 1.23, P= 0.40). Higher blood loss was noted in the second case cohort (186.7 ml vs. 221.7 ml, P = 0.002). Additionally, factors associated with PSM were increasing prostate specific antigen, higher percent tumor involvement, extraprostatic extension, and seminal vesicle invasion.

CONCLUSION

Case sequence was not associated with PSM, lymph node yield, or operative time for RALP. Disease specific factors and institutional experience are associated with increased risk for positive surgical margin which can aid providers in scheduling of patients.

摘要

目的

多个机器人辅助手术通常在单个手术日进行;然而,这种做法对患者预后的影响尚未得到研究。我们旨在确定机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术(RALP)连续进行时的预后是否存在差异。

材料与方法

进行了一项多机构回顾性队列研究,涉及2015年至2018年期间的8个学术中心。参与者为成年男性,在同一住院医师-主治医生团队连续进行2例RALP手术的手术日接受局限性前列腺癌的RALP手术。该研究的主要结局是手术切缘阳性(PSM)的存在情况。次要结局包括淋巴结获取量、手术时间和估计失血量。主要分析是针对PSM的随机效应荟萃分析模型。

结果

总体而言,该研究纳入了898例RALP手术病例(449对连续病例)。第一组和第二组病例的PSM率分别为27.2%和30.3%,差异无统计学意义(P = 0.338)。采用随机效应荟萃分析,第二组病例发生PSM的风险未增加(OR 1.23,P = 0.40)。第二组病例的失血量更高(186.7 ml对221.7 ml,P = 0.002)。此外,与PSM相关的因素包括前列腺特异性抗原升高、肿瘤累及百分比更高、前列腺外侵犯和精囊侵犯。

结论

病例顺序与RALP的PSM、淋巴结获取量或手术时间无关。疾病特异性因素和机构经验与手术切缘阳性风险增加相关,这有助于医疗人员安排患者手术。

相似文献

1
"Robotic fatigue?" - The impact of case order on positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.“机器人手术疲劳?”——病例顺序对机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术中手术切缘阳性的影响
Urol Oncol. 2021 Jun;39(6):365.e17-365.e23. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.10.071. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
2
A multinational, multi-institutional study comparing positive surgical margin rates among 22393 open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy patients.一项多国、多机构的研究比较了 22393 例开放、腹腔镜和机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术患者的阳性切缘率。
Eur Urol. 2014 Sep;66(3):450-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.018. Epub 2013 Nov 24.
3
Laparoscopic surgery experience does not influence oncological and functional results of robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.腹腔镜手术经验不会影响机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术的肿瘤学和功能结果。
Urologia. 2022 May;89(2):240-243. doi: 10.1177/03915603211004781. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
4
Positive surgical margins and early oncological outcomes of robotic vs open radical prostatectomy at a medium case-load institution.中等手术量机构中机器人辅助与开放根治性前列腺切除术的手术切缘阳性情况及早期肿瘤学结局
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2017 Feb;69(1):63-68. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.16.02518-2. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
5
Factors affecting surgical margin positivity in robotic assisted radical prostatectomy.影响机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中手术切缘阳性的因素。
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2017 Mar 31;89(1):71-74. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2017.1.71.
6
The addition of robotic surgery to an established laparoscopic radical prostatectomy program: effect on positive surgical margins.在已有的腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术项目中增加机器人手术:对手术切缘阳性的影响。
Can J Urol. 2008 Apr;15(2):3994-9.
7
The Impact of Experience on the Risk of Surgical Margins and Biochemical Recurrence after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Learning Curve Study.经验对机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后手术切缘和生化复发风险的影响:学习曲线研究。
J Urol. 2019 Jul;202(1):108-113. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000147. Epub 2019 Jun 7.
8
NeuroSAFE robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus standard robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for men with localised prostate cancer (NeuroSAFE PROOF): protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study.神经安全机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术与标准机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌的比较(NeuroSAFE PROOF):一项随机对照可行性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 11;9(6):e028132. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028132.
9
Minimally Invasive Radical Prostatectomy after Previous Bladder Outlet Surgery: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Comparative Studies.既往膀胱出口手术后继发的微创前列腺癌根治术:系统评价和荟萃分析的比较研究。
J Urol. 2019 Sep;202(3):511-517. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000312. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
10
The effect of minimally invasive prostatectomy on practice patterns of American urologists.微创前列腺切除术对美国泌尿外科医生执业模式的影响。
Urol Oncol. 2016 Jun;34(6):255.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.01.008. Epub 2016 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

1
"Single-Surgeon" versus "Dual-Surgeon" Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph-nodes Dissection: Comparative Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes.“单刀”与“双刀”机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术和盆腔淋巴结清扫术:围手术期结局的比较分析。
Int Braz J Urol. 2023 Nov-Dec;49(6):732-739. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2023.0348.
2
Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analyses, Clinical Parameters, and Preoperative Nomograms in the Prediction of Extraprostatic Extension.前列腺磁共振成像分析、临床参数及术前列线图在预测前列腺外侵犯中的应用
Clin Pract. 2021 Oct 9;11(4):763-774. doi: 10.3390/clinpract11040091.