Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Ospedale San Raffaele , Milan , Italy.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York , New York.
J Urol. 2019 Jul;202(1):108-113. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000147. Epub 2019 Jun 7.
Improved cancer control with increasing surgical experience (the learning curve) has been demonstrated for open and laparoscopic prostatectomy. We assessed the relationship between surgical experience and oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
We analyzed the records of 1,827 patients in whom prostate cancer was treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Surgical experience was coded as the total number of robotic prostatectomies performed by the surgeon before the patient operation. We evaluated the relationship of prior surgeon experience to the probability of positive margins and biochemical recurrence in regression models adjusting for stage, grade and prostate specific antigen.
After adjusting for case mix, greater surgeon experience was associated with a lower probability of positive surgical margins (p = 0.035). The risk of positive margins decreased from 16.7% to 9.6% in patients treated by a surgeon with 10 and 250 prior procedures, respectively (risk difference 7.1%, 95% CI 1.7-12.2). In patients with nonorgan confined disease the predicted probability of positive margins was 38.4% in those treated by surgeons with 10 prior operations and 24.9% in those treated by surgeons with 250 prior operations (absolute risk reduction 13.5%, 95% CI -3.4-22.5). The relationship between surgical experience and the risk of biochemical recurrence after surgery was not significant (p = 0.8).
Specific techniques used by experienced surgeons which are associated with improved margin rates need further research. The impact of experience on cancer control after robotic prostatectomy differed from that in the prior literature on open and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, and should be investigated in larger multi-institutional studies.
已证实,随着手术经验的增加(学习曲线),开放和腹腔镜前列腺切除术的癌症控制得到改善。我们评估了机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的手术经验与肿瘤学结果之间的关系。
我们分析了 1827 例接受机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗前列腺癌患者的记录。手术经验由手术前医生进行的机器人前列腺切除术总数编码。我们在回归模型中评估了术前医生经验与肿瘤切缘阳性和生化复发概率之间的关系,模型中调整了分期、分级和前列腺特异性抗原。
在调整病例组合后,医生经验越丰富,肿瘤切缘阳性的概率越低(p = 0.035)。与接受 10 例和 250 例手术的医生治疗的患者相比,肿瘤切缘阳性的风险分别从 16.7%降至 9.6%(风险差异 7.1%,95%CI 1.7-12.2)。在非器官局限性疾病患者中,接受 10 次手术的医生治疗的患者肿瘤切缘阳性的预测概率为 38.4%,而接受 250 次手术的医生治疗的患者为 24.9%(绝对风险降低 13.5%,95%CI -3.4-22.5)。手术经验与术后生化复发风险之间的关系不显著(p = 0.8)。
与提高切缘率相关的经验丰富的外科医生使用的特定技术需要进一步研究。经验对机器人前列腺切除术后癌症控制的影响与先前开放和腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术文献中的不同,应在更大的多机构研究中进行调查。