Suppr超能文献

比较 Myval 经导管心脏瓣膜与当代经导管心脏瓣膜治疗严重症状性主动脉瓣狭窄患者的安全性和疗效的随机临床试验:LANDMARK 试验。

Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial comparing safety and efficacy of myval transcatheter heart valve versus contemporary transcatheter heart valves in patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis: The LANDMARK trial.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, National University of Ireland, Galway (NUIG), Galway, Ireland; Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Department of Cardiology, National University of Ireland, Galway (NUIG), Galway, Ireland.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2021 Feb;232:23-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.11.001. Epub 2020 Nov 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The recent approval of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with low operative risk has paved the way for the introduction of novel and potentially improved technologies. The safety and efficacy of these novel technologies should be investigated in randomized control trials against the contemporary TAVR devices. The objective of the LANDMARK trial is to compare the balloon-expandable Myval transcatheter heart valve (THV) series with contemporary THV (SAPIEN THV and Evolut THV series) series in patients with severe symptomatic native aortic stenosis.

METHODS/DESIGN: The LANDMARK trial (ClinicalTrials.govNCT04275726, EudraCT number 2020-000,137-40) is a prospective, randomized, multinational, multicenter, open-label, and noninferiority trial of approximately 768 patients treated with TAVR via the transfemoral approach. Patients will be allocated in a 1:1 randomization to Myval THV series (n = 384) or to contemporary THV (n = 384) (either of SAPIEN THV or Evolut THV series). The primary combined safety and efficacy endpoint is a composite of all-cause mortality, all stroke (disabling and nondisabling), bleeding (life-threatening or disabling), acute kidney injury (stage 2 or 3), major vascular complications, prosthetic valve regurgitation (moderate or severe), and conduction system disturbances (requiring new permanent pacemaker implantation), according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria at 30-day follow-up. All patients will have follow-up to 10 years following TAVR.

SUMMARY

The LANDMARK trial is the first randomized head-to-head trial comparing Myval THV series to commercially available THVs in patients indicated for TAVR. We review prior data on head-to-head comparisons of TAVR devices and describe the rationale and design of the LANDMARK trial.

摘要

背景

经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)在低手术风险患者中的最近获批,为新型和潜在改进技术的引入铺平了道路。这些新型技术的安全性和有效性应在随机对照试验中与当代 TAVR 器械进行比较。LANDMARK 试验的目的是比较球囊扩张型 Myval 经导管心脏瓣膜(THV)系列与当代 THV(SAPIEN THV 和 Evolut THV 系列)在严重症状性原发性主动脉瓣狭窄患者中的疗效。

方法/设计:LANDMARK 试验(ClinicalTrials.govNCT04275726,EudraCT 编号 2020-000,137-40)是一项前瞻性、随机、多国、多中心、开放性、非劣效性试验,大约有 768 例患者经股动脉途径接受 TAVR 治疗。患者将以 1:1 的比例随机分配到 Myval THV 系列(n=384)或当代 THV(n=384)(SAPIEN THV 或 Evolut THV 系列)。主要复合安全性和疗效终点是全因死亡率、所有卒中(致残性和非致残性)、出血(危及生命或致残性)、急性肾损伤(第 2 或 3 期)、大血管并发症、人工瓣膜反流(中度或重度)和传导系统障碍(需要新的永久性起搏器植入)的复合终点,根据 Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 标准在 30 天随访时评估。所有患者将在 TAVR 后 10 年进行随访。

总结

LANDMARK 试验是第一项比较 Myval THV 系列与适用于 TAVR 的商业 THV 的头对头随机试验。我们回顾了 TAVR 器械头对头比较的先前数据,并描述了 LANDMARK 试验的原理和设计。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验