Department of Biosciences, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas - UNICAMP, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Department of Biosciences, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas - UNICAMP, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil; Laboratory of Neuroimmune Interface of Pain Research, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Instituto e Centro de Pesquisas São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Int J Pharm. 2021 Jan 5;592:120050. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.120050. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
The objective of the present study was to evaluate discomfort and safety of microneedle (MN) insertion in several intraoral regions. A device was developed to standardize MN insertions. MNs were inserted in the following regions of the oral cavity: gingiva, palatine alveolar process, buccal mucosa, dorsum of the tongue and inner portion of the lower lip. Perforations from MNs post insertion were confirmed with topical gentian violet stain. Pain was evaluated in a randomized, double-blinded, crossover study in 30 volunteers. Each volunteer received a MN patch, a 30G hypodermic needle (positive control) and an identical MN patch with its needles laying flat in the plane of the patch (negative control). Adverse events were visually evaluated immediately after (0 h) and 24 h post MN application. The application device developed a consistent application force (10 N) and promoted perforation of all individual MNs on a patch. At all sites, insertion of the hypodermic needle promoted more pain when compared to the negative control (p < 0.001). Application of the MNs promoted less pain than the hypodermic needle (p < 0.05), but slightly more pain as compared to the negative control (p < 0.05) at all sites except the tongue, where the MN did not differ from the negative control (p > 0.05). Hypodermic needle caused bleeding at all insertion sites. In contrast, MNs did not cause bleeding at most sites except in some cases of insertion into the hard gingiva and the palatine alveolar process where tiny blood spots appeared immediately after MN application for few of the MNs on the patch. There were no cases of bleeding at 24 h post MN application. In conclusion, MNs can perforate different sites of the oral cavity in a safe and significantly less painful manner as compared to the 30G hypodermic needle. Thus, analogous to the skin, MN-based approaches could be an attractive approach for drug delivery in the oral cavity.
本研究的目的是评估微针(MN)在多个口腔内区域插入的不适和安全性。开发了一种设备来标准化 MN 插入。MN 被插入口腔的以下区域:牙龈、腭牙槽突、颊粘膜、舌背和下唇内侧。MN 插入后,用局部龙胆紫染色确认穿孔。在 30 名志愿者中进行了一项随机、双盲、交叉研究,评估疼痛。每个志愿者接受 MN 贴剂、30G 皮下注射针(阳性对照)和其针在贴剂平面内平躺的相同 MN 贴剂(阴性对照)。不良事件在 MN 应用后立即(0 小时)和 24 小时后进行视觉评估。所开发的应用装置施加一致的应用力(10N),并促进了贴剂上所有单个 MN 的穿孔。在所有部位,与阴性对照相比,皮下注射针的插入引起更多的疼痛(p<0.001)。与皮下注射针相比,MN 的应用引起的疼痛较少(p<0.05),但与阴性对照相比,除了舌部外,所有部位的疼痛略多(p<0.05),在舌部,MN 与阴性对照无差异(p>0.05)。皮下注射针在所有插入部位均引起出血。相比之下,MN 在大多数部位不会引起出血,除了在一些情况下,在硬牙龈和腭牙槽突插入时,MN 应用后,贴剂上的一些 MN 会立即出现微小的血点。MN 应用后 24 小时内无出血病例。总之,与 30G 皮下注射针相比,MN 可以以安全且疼痛明显减轻的方式穿孔口腔的不同部位。因此,类似于皮肤,基于 MN 的方法可能是口腔内药物输送的一种有吸引力的方法。