Suppr超能文献

牙龈生物型评估方法的测量性能。

Measurement properties of gingival biotype evaluation methods.

机构信息

Oral Rehabilitation, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil.

Department of Prosthodontics, University of the Sacred Heart, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Jun;20(3):280-284. doi: 10.1111/cid.12583. Epub 2018 Jan 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are numerous methods to measure the dimensions of the gingival tissue, but few have compared the effectiveness of one method over another.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe a new method and to estimate the validity of gingival biotype assessment with the aid of computed tomography scanning (CTS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In each patient different methods of evaluation of the gingival thickness were used: transparency of periodontal probe, transgingival, photography, and a new method of CTS). Intrarater and interrater reliability considering the categorical classification of the gingival biotype were estimated with Cohen's kappa coefficient, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and ANOVA (P < .05). The criterion validity of the CTS was determined using the transgingival method as the reference standard. Sensitivity and specificity values were computed along with theirs 95% CI.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were subjected to assessment of their gingival thickness. The highest agreement was found between transgingival and CTS (86.1%). The comparison between the categorical classifications of CTS and the transgingival method (reference standard) showed high specificity (94.92%) and low sensitivity (53.85%) for definition of a thin biotype.

CONCLUSION

The new method of CTS assessment to classify gingival tissue thickness can be considered reliable and clinically useful to diagnose thick biotype.

摘要

背景

有许多方法可以测量牙龈组织的尺寸,但很少有研究比较一种方法与另一种方法的效果。

目的

本研究旨在描述一种新方法,并通过计算机断层扫描(CTS)评估来估计牙龈生物型评估的有效性。

材料和方法

在每位患者中,使用了不同的方法评估牙龈厚度:牙周探针的透明度、龈下、摄影和一种新的 CTS 方法。使用 Cohen's kappa 系数、组内相关系数(ICC)和 ANOVA 评估考虑牙龈生物型分类的组内和组间可靠性(P<.05)。使用龈下方法作为参考标准来确定 CTS 的标准效度。计算了敏感性和特异性值及其 95%置信区间。

结果

12 名患者接受了牙龈厚度评估。在 transgingival 和 CTS 之间发现了最高的一致性(86.1%)。CTS 和 transgingival 方法的分类之间的比较(参考标准)显示,定义薄生物型的特异性高(94.92%),敏感性低(53.85%)。

结论

用于分类牙龈组织厚度的 CTS 评估新方法可被认为是可靠且临床有用的,可以诊断厚生物型。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验