• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牙龈生物型评估方法的测量性能。

Measurement properties of gingival biotype evaluation methods.

机构信息

Oral Rehabilitation, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil.

Department of Prosthodontics, University of the Sacred Heart, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Jun;20(3):280-284. doi: 10.1111/cid.12583. Epub 2018 Jan 19.

DOI:10.1111/cid.12583
PMID:29350855
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are numerous methods to measure the dimensions of the gingival tissue, but few have compared the effectiveness of one method over another.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe a new method and to estimate the validity of gingival biotype assessment with the aid of computed tomography scanning (CTS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In each patient different methods of evaluation of the gingival thickness were used: transparency of periodontal probe, transgingival, photography, and a new method of CTS). Intrarater and interrater reliability considering the categorical classification of the gingival biotype were estimated with Cohen's kappa coefficient, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and ANOVA (P < .05). The criterion validity of the CTS was determined using the transgingival method as the reference standard. Sensitivity and specificity values were computed along with theirs 95% CI.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were subjected to assessment of their gingival thickness. The highest agreement was found between transgingival and CTS (86.1%). The comparison between the categorical classifications of CTS and the transgingival method (reference standard) showed high specificity (94.92%) and low sensitivity (53.85%) for definition of a thin biotype.

CONCLUSION

The new method of CTS assessment to classify gingival tissue thickness can be considered reliable and clinically useful to diagnose thick biotype.

摘要

背景

有许多方法可以测量牙龈组织的尺寸,但很少有研究比较一种方法与另一种方法的效果。

目的

本研究旨在描述一种新方法,并通过计算机断层扫描(CTS)评估来估计牙龈生物型评估的有效性。

材料和方法

在每位患者中,使用了不同的方法评估牙龈厚度:牙周探针的透明度、龈下、摄影和一种新的 CTS 方法。使用 Cohen's kappa 系数、组内相关系数(ICC)和 ANOVA 评估考虑牙龈生物型分类的组内和组间可靠性(P<.05)。使用龈下方法作为参考标准来确定 CTS 的标准效度。计算了敏感性和特异性值及其 95%置信区间。

结果

12 名患者接受了牙龈厚度评估。在 transgingival 和 CTS 之间发现了最高的一致性(86.1%)。CTS 和 transgingival 方法的分类之间的比较(参考标准)显示,定义薄生物型的特异性高(94.92%),敏感性低(53.85%)。

结论

用于分类牙龈组织厚度的 CTS 评估新方法可被认为是可靠且临床有用的,可以诊断厚生物型。

相似文献

1
Measurement properties of gingival biotype evaluation methods.牙龈生物型评估方法的测量性能。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Jun;20(3):280-284. doi: 10.1111/cid.12583. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
2
Gingival biotype assessment in the esthetic zone: visual versus direct measurement.美学区牙龈生物型评估:视觉评估与直接测量
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2010 Jun;30(3):237-43.
3
Periodontal Biotype: Gingival Thickness as It Relates to Probe Visibility and Buccal Plate Thickness.牙周生物型:与探针可视性及颊侧骨板厚度相关的牙龈厚度
J Periodontol. 2015 Oct;86(10):1141-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.2015.140394. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
4
Assessment of Periodontal Biotype in a Young Chinese Population using Different Measurement Methods.利用不同测量方法评估年轻中国人群的牙周生物型。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 25;8(1):11212. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29542-z.
5
[Preliminary study on gingival biotype by periodontal probing].[牙周探诊对牙龈生物型的初步研究]
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2012 Feb;47(2):81-4. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1002-0098.2012.02.003.
6
The gingival biotype revisited: transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva.重新审视牙龈生物型:牙周探针透过牙龈边缘的透明度作为区分薄牙龈与厚牙龈的一种方法。
J Clin Periodontol. 2009 May;36(5):428-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01398.x.
7
Assessment of gingival biotype and facial hard/soft tissue dimensions in the maxillary anterior teeth region using cone beam computed tomography.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描评估上颌前牙区牙龈生物型及面部软硬组织尺寸。
Arch Oral Biol. 2017 Jul;79:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2017.02.021. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
8
A Comparative Evaluation of Dentogingival Tissue Using Transgingival Probing and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.经牙龈探针与锥形束计算机断层扫描评估牙-龈组织的对比。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Sep 19;58(9):1312. doi: 10.3390/medicina58091312.
9
[The significance of biotype in the predictability of dental-periodontal treatment].[生物型在牙-牙周治疗可预测性中的意义]
Fogorv Sz. 2016 Jun;109(2):45-55.
10
The gingival biotype: measurement of soft and hard tissue dimensions - a radiographic morphometric study.牙龈生物型:软组织和硬组织测量维度——放射影像形态测量研究。
J Clin Periodontol. 2013 Dec;40(12):1132-9. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12169. Epub 2013 Oct 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Evaluation of Selected Methods for Assessing Gingival Phenotype.评估牙龈表型的选定方法的比较评价
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 14;14(8):2669. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082669.
2
Comparison of gingival and periodontal phenotype classification methods and phenotype-related clinical parameters: cross-sectional observational study.牙龈和牙周表型分类方法及与表型相关的临床参数比较:横断面观察性研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Apr 23;25(1):620. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06007-0.
3
A comparative study of the application of three digital imaging techniques to assess the thickness of the palatal mucosa of the maxillary anterior teeth.
三种数字化成像技术在上颌前牙腭侧黏骨膜厚度评估中应用的对比研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):1137. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04896-1.
4
Gingival phenotype classification by visual and probe visibility assessments: Relationship with thickness and probe design.通过视觉和探针可视性评估进行牙龈表型分类:与厚度和探针设计的关系。
J Periodontol. 2025 Apr;96(4):309-320. doi: 10.1002/JPER.24-0172. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
5
Local application of 0.8% hyaluronic acid gel as an adjunct to minimally invasive nonsurgical treatment of periodontal intrabony defects-A randomized clinical trial.局部应用0.8%透明质酸凝胶辅助微创非手术治疗牙周骨内缺损——一项随机临床试验
J Periodontal Res. 2025 Mar;60(3):215-225. doi: 10.1111/jre.13331. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
6
Deep learning assisted sparse array ultrasound imaging.深度学习辅助稀疏阵超声成像。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 30;18(10):e0293468. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293468. eCollection 2023.
7
An evaluation of gingival phenotype and thickness as determined by indirect and direct methods.间接法和直接法评估的牙龈表型和厚度。
Angle Orthod. 2023 Nov 1;93(6):675-682. doi: 10.2319/081622-573.1.
8
Effect of craniofacial morphology on gingival parameters of mandibular incisors.颅面形态对下颌切牙牙龈参数的影响。
Angle Orthod. 2023 Sep 1;93(5):545-551. doi: 10.2319/101122-700.1.
9
Accurate gingival segmentation from 3D images with artificial intelligence: an animal pilot study.利用人工智能进行 3D 图像中的精确牙龈分割:一项动物初步研究。
Prog Orthod. 2023 May 1;24(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40510-023-00465-4.
10
Ultrasound Imaging of the Periodontium Complex: A Reliability Study.牙周复合体的超声成像:一项可靠性研究。
Int J Dent. 2023 Feb 16;2023:5494429. doi: 10.1155/2023/5494429. eCollection 2023.