[Health care safety: The discrepancies between experience and degree of satisfaction of hospitalized patients observed in interviews performed by user representatives].

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this article is to present the results of a qualitative survey conducted by user representatives (URs) focusing on the health care safety experience of hospitalized patients. The authors wished to identify factors associated with safety of care and, more specifically, with the possibly ominous medical events reported by patients.

METHODS

After being trained with these objectives in mind, eight URs conducted semi-directive interviews with fourteen patients hospitalized in eleven separate hospital units in nine different hospitals.

RESULTS

Eight types of factors consisting in 30 contributing factors liable to be reported by patients were identified: 1) factors related to patients' basic needs; 2) personalization of care; 3) professional factors; 4) organizational factors; 5) communication factors; 6) caregiver responsiveness; 7) infectious risks; 8) continuity of care. Patients' overall feelings about their hospitalization remained excellent notwithstanding more tempered, even negative experiences.

CONCLUSION

This paradoxical result shows that the patients' actual experience is far more instructive than their degree of satisfaction. In light of this study, the acceptability of this type of research (i.e. research conducted by URs) is excellent and it also appears highly feasible, whatever the limitations imposed by organizational considerations.