• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
User-testing of a decision-support tool for parents facing threatened periviable delivery: The Periviable GOALS decision aid.针对面临早产威胁的父母的决策支持工具的用户测试:极早产儿 GOALS 决策辅助工具。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Jun;104(6):1286-1294. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.10.004. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
2
Creation of a Decision Support Tool for Expectant Parents Facing Threatened Periviable Delivery: Application of a User-Centered Design Approach.为面临早产威胁的准父母创建决策支持工具:应用以用户为中心的设计方法。
Patient. 2019 Jun;12(3):327-337. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0348-y.
3
User-centered development of a hypospadias decision aid prototype.以患者为中心的尿道下裂决策辅助原型开发。
J Pediatr Urol. 2020 Oct;16(5):684.e1-684.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.07.047. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
4
Values clarification: Eliciting the values that inform and influence parents' treatment decisions for periviable birth.价值观澄清:引出影响父母对可存活极限孕周前出生儿治疗决策的价值观。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2020 Sep;34(5):556-564. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12590. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
5
Ask the parents: Testing the acceptability and usability of a hypospadias decision aid.询问家长:测试尿道下裂决策辅助工具的可接受性和可用性。
J Pediatr Urol. 2022 Apr;18(2):170.e1-170.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.01.004. Epub 2022 Jan 16.
6
Feasibility and acceptability of chaplain decision coaching on Periviable resuscitation decision quality: A pilot study.牧师决策指导对极早产儿复苏决策质量的可行性与可接受性:一项试点研究。
PEC Innov. 2024 Feb 21;4:100266. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100266. eCollection 2024 Dec.
7
Periviable Decision-Making in a New Era of Parentage: Ethical and Legal Considerations and Provider Perspectives on Shared Decision-making in Diverse Family Structures.极早早产决策的新时代:不同家庭结构中亲权共享决策的伦理法律考量及提供者视角
J Pediatr. 2022 Dec;251:24-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Aug 7.
8
'Expert advice' for developing decision support: A qualitative study of women who have experienced periviable birth.专家建议:为开发决策支持而制定——对经历过极早产儿分娩的女性进行的定性研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Oct;104(10):2565-2570. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.03.003. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
9
Mode of delivery in the context of periviable birth: informed deference and shared decision-making.极早早产情况下的分娩方式:知情尊重与共同决策。
J Perinatol. 2023 Jan;43(1):23-28. doi: 10.1038/s41372-022-01537-9. Epub 2022 Nov 19.
10
Prospective parents' perspectives on antenatal decision making for the anticipated birth of a periviable infant.准父母对于可存活孕周前胎儿预期出生的产前决策的看法。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Mar;32(5):820-825. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1393066. Epub 2017 Nov 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility of an Intervention to Support Shared Decision-Making for Critically Ill Infants.一项支持危重症婴儿共同决策的干预措施的可行性
J Pediatr. 2025 Aug;283:114632. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2025.114632. Epub 2025 May 2.
2
Who decides? Exploring decisional dynamics for periviable resuscitation among diverse family structures.谁来做决定?探索不同家庭结构中可存活孕周新生儿复苏的决策动态。
J Perinatol. 2025 Apr 16. doi: 10.1038/s41372-025-02290-5.
3
Development of a parent decision support tool for surgical necrotising enterocolitis: a study protocol.用于外科坏死性小肠结肠炎的家长决策支持工具的开发:一项研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 9;14(12):e087939. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087939.
4
Feasibility and acceptability of chaplain decision coaching on Periviable resuscitation decision quality: A pilot study.牧师决策指导对极早产儿复苏决策质量的可行性与可接受性:一项试点研究。
PEC Innov. 2024 Feb 21;4:100266. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100266. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
Decisional Satisfaction, Regret, and Conflict Among Parents of Infants with Neurologic Conditions.神经疾病患儿父母的决策满意度、后悔和冲突。
J Pediatr. 2022 Jun;245:81-88.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.02.043. Epub 2022 Feb 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Values clarification: Eliciting the values that inform and influence parents' treatment decisions for periviable birth.价值观澄清:引出影响父母对可存活极限孕周前出生儿治疗决策的价值观。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2020 Sep;34(5):556-564. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12590. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
2
The impact of decision quality on mental health following periviable delivery.极早产儿分娩后决策质量对心理健康的影响。
J Perinatol. 2019 Dec;39(12):1595-1601. doi: 10.1038/s41372-019-0403-0. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
3
Evaluating shared decision-making in periviable counseling using objective structured clinical examinations.使用客观结构化临床考试评估极早产儿咨询中的共同决策。
J Perinatol. 2019 Jun;39(6):857-865. doi: 10.1038/s41372-019-0366-1. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
4
Creation of a Decision Support Tool for Expectant Parents Facing Threatened Periviable Delivery: Application of a User-Centered Design Approach.为面临早产威胁的准父母创建决策支持工具:应用以用户为中心的设计方法。
Patient. 2019 Jun;12(3):327-337. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0348-y.
5
Prospective parents' perspectives on antenatal decision making for the anticipated birth of a periviable infant.准父母对于可存活孕周前胎儿预期出生的产前决策的看法。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Mar;32(5):820-825. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1393066. Epub 2017 Nov 5.
6
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4(4):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5.
7
Field testing of decision coaching with a decision aid for parents facing extreme prematurity.针对面临极早产情况的父母,使用决策辅助工具进行决策指导的现场测试。
J Perinatol. 2017 Jun;37(6):728-734. doi: 10.1038/jp.2017.29. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
8
Survival and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes among Periviable Infants.超早产儿的生存及神经发育结局
N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 16;376(7):617-628. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1605566.
9
A Pilot Study of Neonatologists' Decision-Making Roles in Delivery Room Resuscitation Counseling for Periviable Births.一项关于新生儿科医生在极早早产儿产房复苏咨询中决策角色的试点研究。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2016 Jul;7(3):175-182. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2015.1085460.
10
Development of a video decision aid to inform parents on potential outcomes of extreme prematurity.开发一种视频决策辅助工具,以告知家长极早产儿的潜在预后情况。
J Perinatol. 2016 Nov;36(11):939-943. doi: 10.1038/jp.2016.127. Epub 2016 Aug 18.

针对面临早产威胁的父母的决策支持工具的用户测试:极早产儿 GOALS 决策辅助工具。

User-testing of a decision-support tool for parents facing threatened periviable delivery: The Periviable GOALS decision aid.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, 410 W. 10th Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, 410 W. 10th Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Jun;104(6):1286-1294. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.10.004. Epub 2020 Oct 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2020.10.004
PMID:33162273
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9664996/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To report user-centered design methods and stakeholder acceptability ratings of the Periviable GOALS (Getting Optimal Alignment around Life Support) decision aid (DA).

METHODS

'Experienced' and 'expectant' mothers engaged in content and design refining sessions. Five videos (10 families) were embedded in the DA to highlight life after delivery. User-testing sessions were conducted with mothers and providers to assess acceptability. End-user testing was conducted with hospitalized women facing potential periviable delivery to assess acceptability and feasibility in the clinical setting.

RESULTS

108 participants engaged in sessions from July 2017-January 2020. Twenty-seven refining sessions resulted in a DA providing survival estimates, neonatal outcomes descriptions, and values clarification exercises. Five white and five black women participated in the videos; six having surviving children (ages 16 months-4 years). Twelve mothers, 16 providers, and six hospitalized women evaluated acceptability. 95.1 % found the content "just right," 94.9 % rated the videos "good" or "excellent," and 97.2 % believed GOALS would support families in periviable decision-making.

CONCLUSION

Our results highlight the importance of developing a DA that is acceptable for patient use with direct involvement of stakeholders.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

The GOALS DA may prepare families to engage in shared decision-making to facilitate more patient-centered models of periviable care.

摘要

背景

报告以患者为中心的设计方法和利益相关者对围产 GOALS(围绕生命支持获得最佳调整)决策辅助工具(DA)的接受程度。

方法

经验丰富和预期的母亲参与了内容和设计精炼会议。五个视频(10 个家庭)被嵌入到 DA 中,以突出分娩后的生活。对母亲和提供者进行用户测试,以评估可接受性。对面临潜在围产分娩的住院妇女进行最终用户测试,以评估在临床环境中的可接受性和可行性。

结果

2017 年 7 月至 2020 年 1 月,108 名参与者参加了会议。27 次精炼会议得出了一个提供生存估计、新生儿结局描述和价值澄清练习的 DA。五名白人妇女和五名黑人妇女参加了视频;其中六名有存活的孩子(年龄 16 个月至 4 岁)。12 名母亲、16 名提供者和 6 名住院妇女评估了可接受性。95.1%的人认为内容“恰到好处”,94.9%的人认为视频“好”或“优秀”,97.2%的人认为 GOALS 将支持家庭进行围产决策。

结论

我们的结果强调了开发一种 DA 的重要性,这种 DA 必须在患者使用方面是可接受的,并且需要直接让利益相关者参与。

实践意义

GOALS DA 可以使家庭做好准备,参与共同决策,从而促进更以患者为中心的围产护理模式。