Suppr超能文献

莫索尼定与盐酸可乐定治疗高血压患者的比较。

Comparison of moxonidine and clonidine HCl in treating patients with hypertension.

作者信息

Plänitz V

机构信息

Clinical Research Department, Beiersdorf AG, Hamburg, FRG.

出版信息

J Clin Pharmacol. 1987 Jan;27(1):46-51. doi: 10.1177/009127008702700107.

Abstract

In a six-week multicenter, double-blind comparison study, moxonidine and clonidine HCl were tested in 122 and 30 outpatients, respectively, with mild to moderate hypertension (World Health Organization stage I and II; highest measured diastolic blood pressure, 90 to 115 mm Hg). Each agent reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressure to a similar significant extent: moxonidine, 25.4 and 12.4 mm Hg, respectively; clonidine, 25.3 and 10.0 mm Hg, respectively (P less than .001 vs baseline). The mean individually titrated dose of moxonidine and clonidine HCl was found to be 0.36 mg/d. Clonidine slightly reduced heart rate in patients assuming an upright position by 3 beats/min at the end of dose titration (P = .018), while moxonidine did not. Two patients receiving moxonidine and three patients taking clonidine HCl discontinued therapy because of side effects. However, patients administered clonidine experienced significantly more side effects (53%) compared with a 30% incidence of adverse effects associated with moxonidine (P = .031). The most frequent adverse effect of both agents was dryness of mouth, which was mentioned significantly more often with clonidine (47%) than with moxonidine (20%) (P = .005). Edemas were found in 0.8% and 17% of patients during six-week treatment with moxonidine and clonidine, respectively (P = .001). Accordingly, moxonidine was tolerated significantly better than clonidine (P less than .001) in this parallel comparison study. Moxonidine is as effective as clonidine in monotherapy of mild to moderate essential hypertension and, additionally, neither drug produces clinically important changes in biochemical parameters.

摘要

在一项为期六周的多中心双盲对照研究中,分别对122例和30例轻度至中度高血压门诊患者(世界卫生组织I期和II期;最高测量舒张压为90至115mmHg)进行了莫索尼定和盐酸可乐定的试验。两种药物均能显著降低收缩压和舒张压,且程度相似:莫索尼定分别降低25.4mmHg和12.4mmHg;可乐定分别降低25.3mmHg和10.0mmHg(与基线相比,P<0.001)。发现莫索尼定和盐酸可乐定的平均个体化滴定剂量为0.36mg/d。在剂量滴定结束时,可乐定使直立位患者的心率略有降低,每分钟降低3次(P=0.018),而莫索尼定则无此作用。两名服用莫索尼定的患者和三名服用盐酸可乐定的患者因副作用而停药。然而,与服用莫索尼定的患者30%的不良反应发生率相比,服用可乐定的患者出现副作用的比例显著更高(53%)(P=0.031)。两种药物最常见的不良反应是口干,可乐定引起口干的比例(47%)显著高于莫索尼定(20%)(P=0.005)。在莫索尼定和可乐定六周治疗期间,分别有0.8%和17%的患者出现水肿(P=0.001)。因此,在这项平行对照研究中,莫索尼定的耐受性明显优于可乐定(P<0.001)。在轻度至中度原发性高血压的单一疗法中,莫索尼定与可乐定同样有效,此外,两种药物均未引起生化参数的临床重要变化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验