Faculty of Pharmacy, Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical Centre, Central Pharmacy, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2024 Jun;12(3):e1215. doi: 10.1002/prp2.1215.
Cardiovascular disorders are the leading cause of death in the world. Many organ diseases (kidney, heart, and brain) are substantially more prone to develop in people with hypertension. In the treatment of hypertension, first-line medications are recommended, while imidazoline receptor agonists are not first-line antihypertensives. Our goal was to conduct a network meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of imidazoline receptor agonists. The meta-analysis was performed following the PRISMA guidelines using the PICOS format, considering the CONSORT recommendations. Studies were collected from four databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase. A total of 5960 articles were found. After filtering, 27 studies remained eligible for network meta-analysis. Moxonidine reduced blood pressure in sitting position statistically significantly after 8 weeks of treatment (SBP MD: 23.80; 95% CI: 17.45-30.15; DBP MD: 10.90; 95% CI: 8.45-13.35) compared to placebo. Moreover, moxonidine reduced blood pressure more effectively than enalapril; however, this difference was not significant (SBP MD: 3.10; 95% CI: -2.60-8.80; DBP MD: 1.30; 95% CI: -1.25-3.85). Dry mouth was experienced as a side effect in the case of all imidazoline receptor agonists. After 8 weeks of treatment, the appearance of dry mouth was highest with clonidine (OR: 9.27 95% CI: 4.70-18.29) and lowest with rilmenidine (OR: 6.46 95% CI: 0.85-49.13) compared to placebo. Somnolence was less frequent with moxonidine compared to rilmenidine (OR: 0.63 95% CI: 0.17-2.31). Imidazoline receptor agonists were nearly as effective as the first-line drugs in the examined studies. However, their utility as antihypertensives is limited due to their side effects. As a result, they are not first-line antihypertensives and should not be used in monotherapy. However, in the case of resistant hypertension, they are a viable option. According to our findings, from the point of view of safety and efficacy, moxonidine appears to be the best choice among imidazoline receptor agonists.
心血管疾病是世界上主要的死亡原因。许多器官疾病(肾脏、心脏和大脑)在高血压患者中更容易发生。在高血压的治疗中,建议使用一线药物,而咪唑啉受体激动剂不是一线降压药。我们的目标是进行网络荟萃分析,以评估咪唑啉受体激动剂的疗效和安全性。该荟萃分析按照 PRISMA 指南进行,采用 PICOS 格式,并考虑 CONSORT 建议。研究从四个数据库中收集:PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆、Web of Science 和 Embase。共发现 5960 篇文章。经过筛选,27 项研究符合网络荟萃分析的条件。莫索尼定在治疗 8 周后,坐位血压显著降低(SBP MD:23.80;95%CI:17.45-30.15;DBP MD:10.90;95%CI:8.45-13.35),与安慰剂相比。此外,莫索尼定比依那普利更有效地降低血压;然而,这一差异并不显著(SBP MD:3.10;95%CI:-2.60-8.80;DBP MD:1.30;95%CI:-1.25-3.85)。所有咪唑啉受体激动剂均有口干的副作用。治疗 8 周后,与安慰剂相比,可乐定(OR:9.27 95%CI:4.70-18.29)的口干发生率最高,而利美尼定(OR:6.46 95%CI:0.85-49.13)的口干发生率最低。与利美尼定相比,莫索尼定的嗜睡发生率更低(OR:0.63 95%CI:0.17-2.31)。在研究中,咪唑啉受体激动剂与一线药物一样有效。然而,由于其副作用,它们作为降压药的应用受到限制。因此,它们不是一线降压药,不应单独使用。然而,在难治性高血压的情况下,它们是一种可行的选择。根据我们的研究结果,从安全性和疗效的角度来看,莫索尼定似乎是咪唑啉受体激动剂中最好的选择。