Wilsford D
University of Oklahoma.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1987 Fall;12(3):481-503. doi: 10.1215/03616878-12-3-481.
The French and American medical professions share similar historical bases for strong political and economic market positions. As professions, the attributes of common education, ethics, and mission tend to keep physicians together in their political organization. But the medical professions in both France and the United States are also subject to intraprofessional forces of division, such as the conflicts which often oppose generalists to specialists. Although organized medicine in France and the United States shares these commonalities, there is a very important difference between the two countries. The French profession tends toward organizational particularism, both ideologically and nonideologically, which serves to splinter it in ways inimical to the interests of the medical profession. By contrast, the American medical profession tends to organize universally-that is, its organizational base is much more often one of unity and accommodation toward the divergent interests of physicians. Thus, organized medicine in the United States has more easily fought off political and economic pressures coming from government and the private sector-but by no means with total success. On the other hand, highly fragmented organized medicine in France has experienced an almost linear decline in the face of pressures coming from a determined and strong state.
法国和美国的医学专业在强大的政治和经济市场地位方面有着相似的历史基础。作为专业领域,共同的教育、伦理和使命等属性往往使医生们在其政治组织中团结在一起。但法国和美国的医学专业也受到行业内部分裂力量的影响,比如全科医生与专科医生之间经常存在的冲突。尽管法国和美国的有组织的医学有这些共同点,但两国之间存在一个非常重要的差异。法国的医学专业在意识形态和非意识形态方面都倾向于组织特殊主义,这以损害医学专业利益的方式使其分裂。相比之下,美国的医学专业倾向于统一组织——也就是说,其组织基础更多时候是对医生不同利益的统一和包容。因此,美国有组织的医学更轻松地抵御了来自政府和私营部门的政治和经济压力——但绝非完全成功。另一方面,面对来自坚定且强大的国家的压力,法国高度分散的有组织的医学经历了几乎直线式的衰落。