• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

发展和验证用于鉴别和测量精神病症状的计算机化自适应评估工具。

Development and Validation of a Computerized Adaptive Assessment Tool for Discrimination and Measurement of Psychotic Symptoms.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry Research, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, New York, NY.

Center for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY.

出版信息

Schizophr Bull. 2021 Apr 29;47(3):644-652. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbaa168.

DOI:10.1093/schbul/sbaa168
PMID:33164091
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8084426/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Time constraints limit the use of measurement-based approaches in research and routine clinical management of psychosis. Computerized adaptive testing (CAT) can reduce administration time, thus increasing measurement efficiency. This study aimed to develop and test the capacity of the CAT-Psychosis battery, both self-administered and rater-administered, to measure the severity of psychotic symptoms and discriminate psychosis from healthy controls.

METHODS

An item bank was developed and calibrated. Two raters administered CAT-Psychosis for inter-rater reliability (IRR). Subjects rated themselves and were retested within 7 days for test-retest reliability. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) was administered for convergent validity and chart diagnosis, and the Structured Clinical Interview (SCID) was used to test psychosis discriminant validity.

RESULTS

Development and calibration study included 649 psychotic patients. Simulations revealed a correlation of r = .92 with the total 73-item bank score, using an average of 12 items. Validation study included 160 additional patients and 40 healthy controls. CAT-Psychosis showed convergent validity (clinician: r = 0.690; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.610-0.757; self-report: r = .690; 95% CI: 0.609-0.756), IRR (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.733; 95% CI: 0.611-0.828), and test-retest reliability (clinician ICC = 0.862; 95% CI: 0.767-0.922; self-report ICC = 0.815; 95%CI: 0.741-0.871). CAT-Psychosis could discriminate psychosis from healthy controls (clinician: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.965, 95% CI: 0.945-0.984; self-report AUC = 0.850, 95% CI: 0.807-0.894). The median length of the clinician-administered assessment was 5 minutes (interquartile range [IQR]: 3:23-8:29 min) and 1 minute, 20 seconds (IQR: 0:57-2:09 min) for the self-report.

CONCLUSION

CAT-Psychosis can quickly and reliably assess the severity of psychosis and discriminate psychotic patients from healthy controls, creating an opportunity for frequent remote assessment and patient/population-level follow-up.

摘要

目的

时间限制限制了基于测量的方法在精神病学研究和常规临床管理中的应用。计算机化自适应测试(CAT)可以减少管理时间,从而提高测量效率。本研究旨在开发和测试 CAT-精神病学电池的能力,无论是自我管理还是评估者管理,以测量精神病症状的严重程度,并将精神病与健康对照区分开来。

方法

开发和校准了一个项目库。两名评估者对 CAT-精神病学进行了评估,以评估评估者间的可靠性(IRR)。被试者自我评估,并在 7 天内进行重测,以评估测试-重测的可靠性。简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)用于评估收敛效度和图表诊断,结构临床访谈(SCID)用于评估精神病学的判别效度。

结果

发展和校准研究包括 649 名精神病患者。模拟显示,使用平均 12 个项目,与总 73 个项目库得分的相关性为 r =.92。验证研究包括 160 名额外的患者和 40 名健康对照者。CAT-精神病学表现出收敛效度(评估者:r = 0.690;95%置信区间[95%CI]:0.610-0.757;自我报告:r =.690;95%CI:0.609-0.756)、IRR(组内相关系数[ICC] = 0.733;95%CI:0.611-0.828)和测试-重测的可靠性(评估者 ICC = 0.862;95%CI:0.767-0.922;自我报告 ICC = 0.815;95%CI:0.741-0.871)。CAT-精神病学可以将精神病与健康对照者区分开来(评估者:受试者工作特征曲线下面积[AUC] = 0.965,95%CI:0.945-0.984;自我报告 AUC = 0.850,95%CI:0.807-0.894)。评估者管理的评估中位数长度为 5 分钟(四分位距[IQR]:3:23-8:29 分钟),自我报告的评估中位数长度为 1 分 20 秒(IQR:0:57-2:09 分钟)。

结论

CAT-精神病学可以快速可靠地评估精神病的严重程度,并将精神病患者与健康对照者区分开来,为频繁的远程评估和患者/人群水平的随访创造了机会。

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of a Computerized Adaptive Assessment Tool for Discrimination and Measurement of Psychotic Symptoms.发展和验证用于鉴别和测量精神病症状的计算机化自适应评估工具。
Schizophr Bull. 2021 Apr 29;47(3):644-652. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbaa168.
2
Awareness of illness moderates self-assessment of psychotic symptoms.病识感会调节精神病症状的自我评估。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2022 Oct;56(10):1287-1294. doi: 10.1177/00048674211057480. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
3
Development of a computerized adaptive diagnostic screening tool for psychosis.一种用于精神病的计算机自适应诊断筛查工具的开发。
Schizophr Res. 2022 Jul;245:116-121. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2021.03.020. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
4
The WERCAP Screen and the WERC Stress Screen: psychometrics of self-rated instruments for assessing bipolar and psychotic disorder risk and perceived stress burden.WERCAP 筛查和 WERC 应激筛查:自评工具评估双相及精神病性障碍风险和感知应激负担的心理测量学研究。
Compr Psychiatry. 2014 Oct;55(7):1757-71. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.07.004. Epub 2014 Jul 7.
5
A preliminary examination of the validity and reliability of a new brief rating scale for symptom domains of psychosis: Brief Evaluation of Psychosis Symptom Domains (BE-PSD).一种用于精神病症状领域的新简短评定量表的效度和信度的初步检验:精神病症状领域简短评估(BE-PSD)。
J Psychiatr Res. 2016 Sep;80:87-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
6
Self-Evaluation of Negative Symptoms: A Novel Tool to Assess Negative Symptoms.阴性症状的自我评估:一种评估阴性症状的新工具。
Schizophr Bull. 2016 May;42(3):571-8. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbv161. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
7
The validity of using patient self-report to assess psychotic symptoms in schizophrenia.使用患者自我报告评估精神分裂症患者精神病性症状的有效性。
Schizophr Res. 2007 Feb;90(1-3):245-50. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2006.11.011. Epub 2007 Jan 3.
8
[Assessment of mental states at risk of psychotic transition: validation of the French version of the CAARMS].[精神病性转变风险的精神状态评估:CAARMS法语版的验证]
Encephale. 2014 Dec;40(6):447-56. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2013.12.003. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
9
The Questionnaire for Psychotic Experiences: An Examination of the Validity and Reliability.《精神病体验问卷》:有效性和可靠性的检验。
Schizophr Bull. 2019 Feb 1;45(45 Suppl 1):S78-S87. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sby148.
10
Working memory predicts presence of auditory verbal hallucinations in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder with psychosis.工作记忆可预测精神分裂症及伴有精神病性症状的双相情感障碍中幻听言语的出现。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2018 Feb;40(1):84-94. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2017.1321106. Epub 2017 May 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia: From the Consensus Conference-Derived Scales to Remote Digital Phenotyping.精神分裂症阴性症状评估:从共识会议衍生量表到远程数字表型分析
Brain Sci. 2025 Jan 17;15(1):83. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15010083.
2
Close, yet so far away: a phenomenology of the praecox feeling in the diagnosis of schizophrenia as intercorporeal alienness.近在咫尺,却又遥不可及:精神分裂症诊断中作为躯体间异化的早发性感觉现象学。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 2;15:1445615. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1445615. eCollection 2024.
3
Developing an accurate and efficient tool for the internalizing spectrum: A simulation study of the adaptive algorithm to the Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms II (IDAS-II).开发一种准确高效的内化谱工具:对抑郁和焦虑症状量表 II(IDAS-II)自适应算法的模拟研究。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2024 Sep;33(3):e2032. doi: 10.1002/mpr.2032.
4
Walk-in mental health: Bridging barriers in a pandemic.门诊心理健康:大流行中的障碍跨越。
PLoS One. 2024 May 31;19(5):e0302543. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302543. eCollection 2024.
5
On the Road to Individualizing Pharmacotherapy for Adolescents and Adults with Schizophrenia - Results from an Expert Consensus Following the Delphi Method.青少年和成人精神分裂症个体化药物治疗之路——德尔菲法专家共识结果
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2024 May 24;20:1139-1152. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S456163. eCollection 2024.
6
Validation of the structured interview section of the penn computerized adaptive test for neurocognitive and clinical psychopathology assessment (CAT GOASSESS).用于神经认知和临床精神病理学评估的宾夕法尼亚计算机自适应测试(CAT GOASSESS)结构化访谈部分的验证
Psychiatry Res. 2024 May;335:115862. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2024.115862. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
7
Effects of live-online, group mindfulness training on opioid use and anxiety during buprenorphine treatment: A comparative effectiveness RCT.在线实时团体正念训练对丁丙诺啡治疗期间阿片类药物使用及焦虑的影响:一项比较疗效随机对照试验
Contemp Clin Trials. 2024 Feb;137:107417. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107417. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
8
The Current State and Validity of Digital Assessment Tools for Psychiatry: Systematic Review.精神病学数字评估工具的现状与有效性:系统评价
JMIR Ment Health. 2022 Mar 30;9(3):e32824. doi: 10.2196/32824.
9
Application of Digital Medicine in Addiction.数字医学在成瘾领域的应用。
J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Sci. 2022;27(2):144-152. doi: 10.1007/s12204-021-2391-4. Epub 2021 Nov 28.
10
Development and Validation of Computerized Adaptive Assessment Tools for the Measurement of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Among US Military Veterans.开发和验证用于测量美国退伍军人创伤后应激障碍的计算机化自适应评估工具。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2115707. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.15707.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of a computerized adaptive substance use disorder scale for screening and measurement: the CAT-SUD.用于筛查和测量的计算机化自适应物质使用障碍量表的研制:CAT-SUD。
Addiction. 2020 Jul;115(7):1382-1394. doi: 10.1111/add.14938. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
2
Is Transcultural Psychiatry Possible?跨文化精神病学是否可行?
JAMA. 2019 Dec 10;322(22):2167-2168. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.17331.
3
Computerized Adaptive Tests for Rapid and Accurate Assessment of Psychopathology Dimensions in Youth.计算机化自适应测验用于快速、准确评估青少年精神病理学维度。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 Nov;59(11):1264-1273. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2019.08.009. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
4
Improving the Evaluation of Adult Mental Disorders in the Criminal Justice System With Computerized Adaptive Testing.利用计算机化自适应测验改善刑事司法系统中成人精神障碍的评估。
Psychiatr Serv. 2019 Nov 1;70(11):1040-1043. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201900038. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
5
Depression in Emergency Department Patients and Association With Health Care Utilization.急诊科患者的抑郁状况及其与医疗保健利用的关系。
Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Aug;26(8):878-888. doi: 10.1111/acem.13726. Epub 2019 Apr 7.
6
Reliability and validity of the self-report version of the apathy evaluation scale in first-episode Psychosis: Concordance with the clinical version at baseline and 12 months follow-up.首发精神病患者自评版淡漠评估量表的信度和效度:与基线和 12 个月随访时临床版的一致性。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Sep;267:140-147. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.05.065. Epub 2018 May 31.
7
Successful validation of the CAT-MH Scales in a sample of Latin American migrants in the United States and Spain.成功验证了 CAT-MH 量表在一组美国和西班牙的拉丁裔移民样本中的有效性。
Psychol Assess. 2018 Oct;30(10):1267-1276. doi: 10.1037/pas0000569. Epub 2018 May 24.
8
An Assessment of Five (PANSS, SAPS, SANS, NSA-16, CGI-SCH) commonly used Symptoms Rating Scales in Schizophrenia and Comparison to Newer Scales (CAINS, BNSS).对精神分裂症中常用的五种症状评定量表(阳性和阴性症状量表、简明精神病评定量表、阴性症状评定量表、NSA - 16、临床总体印象 - 精神分裂症)的评估及与新量表(临床衰退评估量表、简明阴性症状量表)的比较
J Addict Res Ther. 2017;8(3). doi: 10.4172/2155-6105.1000324. Epub 2017 May 11.
9
Bridging the Measurement Gap Between Research and Clinical Care in Schizophrenia: Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale-6 (PANSS-6) and Other Assessments Based on the Simplified Negative and Positive Symptoms Interview (SNAPSI).弥合精神分裂症研究与临床护理之间的测量差距:阳性和阴性症状量表-6(PANSS-6)以及基于简化阴性和阳性症状访谈(SNAPSI)的其他评估
Innov Clin Neurosci. 2017 Dec 1;14(11-12):68-72.
10
What causes psychosis? An umbrella review of risk and protective factors.什么导致了精神病?风险因素和保护因素的综合综述。
World Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;17(1):49-66. doi: 10.1002/wps.20490.