National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado.
Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
J Clin Sleep Med. 2021 Feb 1;17(2):263-298. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.8988.
The purpose of this systematic review is to provide supporting evidence for a clinical practice guideline on the use of behavioral and psychological treatments for chronic insomnia disorder in adult populations.
The American Academy of Sleep Medicine commissioned a task force of 9 experts in sleep medicine and sleep psychology. A systematic review was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials that addressed behavioral and psychological interventions for the treatment of chronic insomnia disorder in adults. Statistical analyses were performed to determine if the treatments produced clinically significant improvements in a range of critical and important outcomes. Finally, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation process was used to evaluate the evidence for making specific treatment recommendations.
The literature search identified 1,244 studies; 124 studies met the inclusion criteria, and 89 studies provided data suitable for statistical analyses. Evidence for the following interventions is presented in this review: cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia, brief therapies for insomnia, stimulus control, sleep restriction therapy, relaxation training, sleep hygiene, biofeedback, paradoxical intention, intensive sleep retraining, and mindfulness. This review provides a detailed summary of the evidence along with the quality of evidence, the balance of benefits vs harms, patient values and preferences, and resource use considerations.
本系统评价旨在为成人慢性失眠障碍的行为和心理治疗临床实践指南提供支持证据。
美国睡眠医学学会委托了 9 名睡眠医学和睡眠心理学专家组成的工作组。进行了系统评价,以确定针对成人慢性失眠障碍治疗的行为和心理干预的随机对照试验。进行了统计分析,以确定治疗是否在一系列关键和重要的结果方面产生了临床显著的改善。最后,使用推荐评估、制定和评估(Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation)过程来评估提出具体治疗建议的证据。
文献检索确定了 1244 项研究;124 项研究符合纳入标准,89 项研究提供了适合进行统计分析的数据。本综述介绍了以下干预措施的证据:失眠认知行为疗法、失眠简短疗法、刺激控制、睡眠限制疗法、放松训练、睡眠卫生、生物反馈、矛盾意向、强化睡眠再训练和正念。本综述详细总结了证据,包括证据质量、利益与危害的平衡、患者价值观和偏好以及资源利用的考虑。