Department of Emergency Medicine.
Department of Health Management, Affiliated hospital of Southwest Medical University, Sichuan, China.
J Craniofac Surg. 2021 May 1;32(3):1022-1024. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000007058.
The aim of this study was to analyze the application effect of medical adhesive in emergency surgical scalp and facial skin treatment. To explore the better application of medical adhesive in emergency work.
A total of 180 patients with scalp and facial skin laceration admitted to the emergency department of the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University from August 2018 to August 2019 were selected. The patients were divided into the control group (n = 70) and the treatment group (n = 110) using the random number table method. The control group was treated with debridement, local anesthesia, and suture technique without medical adhesive, whereas the treatment group was treated with medical adhesive after debridement without local anesthesia. The operation time, pain degree, total cost, and satisfaction of the 2 groups were compared.
The operation time in treatment group was shorter than that in control group (12.0 ± 2.6 minutes versus 17.7 ± 2.5 minutes, P < 0. 05), and the visual simulation score (VAS) of treatment group were lower than that in control group (2.45 ± 1.63 versus 5.66 ± 1.65, P < 0. 05), and the total cost in treatment group was higher than that in control group (¥906.6 ± 69.0 versus ¥329.8 ± 76.4, P < 0. 05). In control group 17 not satisfiedpatients, satisfied 37 patients, and 16 patients felt excellent; in treatment group, there are 7 not satisfiedpatients, 21 satisfied patients, and 82 felt excellent. Patients' satisfaction was compared between the 2 groups, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).
The results suggest that Medical adhesive used in scalp skin trauma and facial wounds had the advantages of shorter operation time, less pain, and higher postoperative satisfaction of patients, but higher cost than conventional suture. Medical adhesive has obvious advantages and high feasibility in the treatment of scalp and facial skin wounds.
本研究旨在分析医用胶在急诊外科头皮及颜面部皮肤外伤处理中的应用效果,探讨医用胶在急诊工作中的更好应用。
选取 2018 年 8 月至 2019 年 8 月西南医科大学附属医院急诊收治的头皮及颜面部皮肤裂伤患者 180 例,采用随机数字表法将患者分为对照组(n=70)和治疗组(n=110)。对照组采用清创、局部麻醉、无医用胶缝合技术治疗,治疗组采用清创后无局部麻醉的医用胶治疗。比较两组的手术时间、疼痛程度、总费用和满意度。
治疗组的手术时间短于对照组(12.0±2.6 分钟比 17.7±2.5 分钟,P<0.05),视觉模拟评分(VAS)低于对照组(2.45±1.63 比 5.66±1.65,P<0.05),总费用高于对照组(¥906.6±69.0 比 ¥329.8±76.4,P<0.05)。对照组 17 例不满意,37 例满意,16 例感觉良好;治疗组 7 例不满意,21 例满意,82 例感觉良好。两组患者满意度比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。
医用胶应用于头皮皮肤创伤和颜面部伤口具有手术时间短、疼痛轻、患者术后满意度高等优点,但费用高于传统缝合。医用胶在头皮及颜面部皮肤伤口的处理中有明显的优势和较高的可行性。