Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States.
School of Mechanical Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020 Nov 2;61(13):15. doi: 10.1167/iovs.61.13.15.
The prevailing theory about the function of lamina cribrosa (LC) connective tissues is that they provide structural support to adjacent neural tissues. Missing connective tissues would compromise this support and therefore are regarded as "LC defects", despite scarce actual evidence of their role. We examined how so-called LC defects alter IOP-related mechanical insult to the LC neural tissues.
We built numerical models incorporating LC microstructure from polarized light microscopy images. To simulate LC defects of varying sizes, individual beams were progressively removed. We then compared intraocular pressure (IOP)-induced neural tissue deformations between models with and without defects. To better understand the consequences of defect development, we also compared neural tissue deformations between models with partial and complete loss of a beam.
The maximum stretch of neural tissues decreased non-monotonically with defect size. Maximum stretch in the model with the largest defect decreased by 40% in comparison to the model with no defects. Partial loss of a beam increased the maximum stretch of neural tissues in its adjacent pores by 162%, compared with 63% in the model with complete loss of a beam.
Missing LC connective tissues can mitigate IOP-induced neural tissue insult, suggesting that the role of the LC connective tissues is more complex than simply fortifying against IOP. The numerical models further predict that partial loss of a beam is biomechanically considerably worse than complete loss of a beam, perhaps explaining why defects have been reported clinically but partial beams have not.
关于筛板结缔组织功能的主流理论认为,它们为相邻的神经组织提供结构支撑。缺失的结缔组织会损害这种支撑,因此被视为“筛板缺陷”,尽管实际上很少有证据表明它们的作用。我们研究了所谓的筛板缺陷如何改变与眼压相关的对筛板神经组织的机械损伤。
我们构建了包含偏光显微镜图像中筛板微观结构的数值模型。为了模拟不同大小的筛板缺陷,我们逐步去除了个别梁。然后,我们比较了有无缺陷模型之间眼压诱导的神经组织变形。为了更好地理解缺陷发展的后果,我们还比较了部分和完全失去梁的模型之间的神经组织变形。
随着缺陷尺寸的增加,神经组织的最大拉伸非单调减小。与无缺陷模型相比,最大缺陷模型的最大拉伸减少了 40%。与完全失去梁的模型相比,梁的部分缺失增加了相邻孔中神经组织的最大拉伸,增加了 162%。
缺失的筛板结缔组织可以减轻眼压引起的神经组织损伤,这表明筛板结缔组织的作用比简单地强化抵抗眼压更为复杂。数值模型进一步预测,梁的部分缺失在生物力学上比完全失去梁要差得多,这也许可以解释为什么临床上已经报道了缺陷,但尚未报道部分梁。