Starkey Hearing Technologies, Eden Prairie, MN.
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, The University of Iowa, Iowa City.
Am J Audiol. 2020 Dec 9;29(4):935-943. doi: 10.1044/2020_AJA-20-00057. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
Purpose The article's purpose was to examine participants' impressions and experiences with smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to inform future EMA study design. Method Adults with hearing impairment (HI, = 9) and with normal hearing (NH, = 10) participated in a study using a smartphone-based EMA system to measure their auditory lifestyles. A 14-item survey was scheduled to deliver every 45 min by an EMA app. After a 1-week trial, participants were interviewed regarding their study experiences. The app log files were analyzed to understand how the participants interacted with the app. Results Across the two groups, 1,295 surveys were completed (compliance rate 74.4%). On average, HI participants completed 10.0 and NH participants completed 9.1 surveys per day. The mean survey completion time for HI and NH groups were 72 s and 51 s, respectively. For both groups, about 90% of the participants reported the app as easy to use; about 60% of the participants reported that repetitive surveys interrupted or somewhat interrupted their activities. Participants reported surveys disrupting situations, for example, working, driving, and social events, and that they were more likely to skip surveys in these situations. Additionally, 50% of NH and 30% of HI participants indicated that the survey was not delivered too frequently and none indicated that the survey was too long. Conclusion Overall, the app and EMA design seem to be appropriate. Insights from this study can help researchers design their studies to adequately assess listeners' experience in the field with optimal compliance and data quality.
目的 本文旨在探讨参与者对基于智能手机的生态瞬时评估(EMA)的印象和体验,为未来的 EMA 研究设计提供信息。
方法 9 名听力障碍(HI)成年人和 10 名听力正常(NH)成年人参与了一项研究,他们使用基于智能手机的 EMA 系统来测量他们的听觉生活方式。一份 14 项的调查问卷,通过 EMA 应用程序每 45 分钟安排一次。经过一周的试用后,参与者接受了关于他们研究体验的访谈。分析应用程序日志文件,以了解参与者如何与应用程序进行交互。
结果 在这两组参与者中,共完成了 1295 份调查问卷(完成率为 74.4%)。平均而言,HI 参与者每天完成 10.0 份调查,NH 参与者每天完成 9.1 份调查。HI 和 NH 组的平均调查完成时间分别为 72 秒和 51 秒。对于这两个组,大约 90%的参与者认为应用程序易于使用;大约 60%的参与者报告说重复的调查会打断或有些打断他们的活动。参与者报告说调查会打断工作、驾驶和社交活动等情况,而且他们在这些情况下更有可能跳过调查。此外,50%的 NH 参与者和 30%的 HI 参与者表示调查频率不算太高,没有人表示调查时间太长。
结论 总体而言,应用程序和 EMA 设计似乎是合适的。本研究的结果可以帮助研究人员设计研究,以在现场以最佳的依从性和数据质量来评估听众的体验。