Department of Orthodontics, School and Hospital of Stomatology, 22# Zhongguancun Avenue South, Haidian District, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Second Dental Center, School and Hospital of Stomatology, 66# Anli Road, ChaoYang District, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 9;10(1):19384. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76537-w.
Superimposition of 3D maxillary digital dental models of different time points based on palatal vault region has been used to evaluate tooth movement during orthodontic treatment. This study evaluated the accuracy and reliability of 3D maxillary digital model (MDM) superimposition in adults by comparing it with CBCT maxillary superimposition. In CBCT maxillary superimposition, voxel-based superimposition was firstly conducted, and MDMs were matched with corresponding CBCT models (CBCT-MDM superimposition). MDM superimposition (palatal vault regional superimposition) were performed on another pair of pre- and posttreatment MDMs. The position and orientation of upper first molars (U6s) and upper central incisors (U1s) on the posttreatment MDMs were compared to assess the accuracy of the MDM superimposition methods. The reliability was validated in both MDM superimposition and CBCT maxillary superimposition. In terms of accuracy, the average linear deviations in U6 and U1 positions were less than ± 0.3 mm, the average angular deviations of U6s and U1s were less than ± 0.2°, both have no significant difference from zero. The ICCs for MDM superimposition ranged from 0.85 to 0.99. The ICCs for CBCT-MDM superimposition were larger than 0.99 in all items. MDM superimposition was an efficient, accurate and reliable method for evaluating teeth movement in adults, although its reliability is slightly lower than CBCT maxillary superimposition.
基于腭穹窿区域的三维上颌数字化牙模的不同时间点叠加已被用于评估正畸治疗过程中的牙齿移动。本研究通过比较 CBCT 上颌叠加,评估了成人 3D 上颌数字化模型(MDM)叠加的准确性和可靠性。在 CBCT 上颌叠加中,首先进行体素叠加,然后将 MDM 与相应的 CBCT 模型匹配(CBCT-MDM 叠加)。在另一对上颌治疗前后的 MDM 上进行 MDM 叠加(腭穹窿区域叠加)。比较治疗后 MDM 上的上颌第一磨牙(U6)和上颌中切牙(U1)的位置和方向,以评估 MDM 叠加方法的准确性。在 MDM 叠加和 CBCT 上颌叠加中都验证了可靠性。在准确性方面,U6 和 U1 位置的平均线性偏差小于±0.3mm,U6 和 U1 的平均角度偏差小于±0.2°,均与零无显著差异。MDM 叠加的 ICC 范围为 0.85 至 0.99。所有项目的 CBCT-MDM 叠加的 ICC 均大于 0.99。MDM 叠加是评估成人牙齿移动的一种有效、准确和可靠的方法,尽管其可靠性略低于 CBCT 上颌叠加。