Pan Yichen, Zhang Zhechen, Xu Tianmin, Chen Gui
Angle Orthod. 2025 May 1;95(3):259-265. doi: 10.2319/071224-555.1.
To validate the accuracy and reliability of a graph convolutional network (GCN)-based superimposition method of a maxillary digital dental model (MDM) by comparing it with manual superimposition and quantifying the clinical error from this method.
Based on a GCN, learning the features from 100 three-dimensional digital occlusal models under supervision of the palatal stable structure labels that were manually annotated by senior specialists, the palatal stable structure was automatically segmented. The average Hausdorff distance was calculated to assess the difference between automatic and manual segmentations. Tooth position and angulation, including rotation, tip, and torque, of bilateral upper first molars and central incisors were obtained to measure the clinical error of automatic superimposition. Reliability was calculated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
The average Hausdorff distance was 0.36 mm between automatic and manual segmentations of the palatal stable region and was larger than the intraexaminer and interexaminer deviations. The tooth position deviation was <0.32 mm, and the tooth angulation difference was <0.26° for tip and torque, and 0.46-0.61° in rotation. ICCs, used for assessment of reliability, ranged from 0.82 to 0.99 in all variables.
The GCN-based MDM superimposition is an efficient method for the assessment of tooth movement in adults. The clinical error in tooth position and angulation induced by the method was clinically acceptable. Reliability was as high as manual segmentation.
通过将基于图卷积网络(GCN)的上颌数字牙模型(MDM)叠加方法与手动叠加进行比较,并量化该方法的临床误差,以验证其准确性和可靠性。
基于GCN,在由资深专家手动标注的腭部稳定结构标签的监督下,从100个三维数字咬合模型中学习特征,自动分割腭部稳定结构。计算平均豪斯多夫距离以评估自动分割与手动分割之间的差异。获取双侧上颌第一磨牙和中切牙的牙齿位置和角度,包括旋转、倾斜和扭矩,以测量自动叠加的临床误差。通过组内相关系数(ICC)计算可靠性。
腭部稳定区域自动分割与手动分割之间的平均豪斯多夫距离为0.36mm,大于检查者内和检查者间的偏差。牙齿位置偏差<0.32mm,牙齿倾斜差异对于倾斜和扭矩<0.26°,旋转时为0.46 - 0.61°。用于评估可靠性的ICC在所有变量中范围为0.82至0.99。
基于GCN的MDM叠加是评估成人牙齿移动的有效方法。该方法引起的牙齿位置和角度的临床误差在临床上是可接受的。可靠性与手动分割一样高。