Department of Respiratory, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
COPD. 2020 Dec;17(6):706-710. doi: 10.1080/15412555.2020.1841745. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
International Classification of Disease 10 (ICD-10) codes record hospital admissions. We aimed to measure the accuracy of COPD exacerbation (ECOPD) codes and examine coding practices for COPD exacerbation.Prospective screening and ICD-10 codes were used to identify potential ECOPD within the DECAF internal validation cohort. Two coding searches were performed. The first search identified patients with an ECOPD discharge code, and a second, broad search was developed to identify all clinically confirmed ECOPD.717 of 1,122 (64%) patients with an ECOPD code had confirmed ECOPD. Common reasons for misclassification in the 405 patients who did not have an ECOPD included: lack of obstructive spirometry to diagnose COPD; and hospital admission due to progressive malignancy, asthma or cardiovascular disease. The broad search identified an additional 297 patients with ECOPD missed by the ECOPD codes. The vast majority of this group had pneumonia complicating ECOPD.ECOPD codes are insufficiently reliable to identify patients with clinically confirmed ECOPD for the purposes of audit or research. Search strategies should include pneumonia codes, specialist review of medical notes and spirometry confirmation of COPD.
国际疾病分类第 10 版(ICD-10)代码记录医院入院情况。我们旨在衡量 COPD 加重(ECOPD)代码的准确性,并检查 COPD 加重的编码实践。DECAAF 内部验证队列前瞻性筛查和 ICD-10 代码用于确定潜在的 ECOPD。进行了两次编码搜索。第一次搜索确定了 ECOPD 出院代码患者,第二次是开发了广泛的搜索以识别所有临床确认的 ECOPD。在 1122 名 ECOPD 代码患者中有 717 名(64%)患有确诊的 ECOPD。405 名未患有 ECOPD 的患者中分类错误的常见原因包括:缺乏用于诊断 COPD 的阻塞性肺功能检查;以及因进展性恶性肿瘤、哮喘或心血管疾病而住院。广泛的搜索还确定了 297 名 ECOPD 患者被 ECOPD 代码遗漏。该组绝大多数患有肺炎合并 ECOPD。ECOPD 代码不足以可靠地识别临床上确诊的 ECOPD 患者,用于审核或研究目的。搜索策略应包括肺炎代码、医学记录专家审查和 COPD 肺功能检查确认。