• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本老年人噎食事故相关的医疗事故诉讼

Medical malpractice litigation related to choking accidents in older people in Japan.

机构信息

Department of Nutrition Faculty of Home Economics, Kyushu Women's University, Kitakyushu, Japan.

Department of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan.

出版信息

Gerodontology. 2021 Mar;38(1):104-112. doi: 10.1111/ger.12506. Epub 2020 Nov 10.

DOI:10.1111/ger.12506
PMID:33169853
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyse malpractice litigation cases in Japan and identify the factors related to choking accidents in older people.

BACKGROUND

Choking while eating is common in older people and has potentially severe consequences.

METHODS

This study analysed court decisions related to choking accidents occurring in Japan between 2000 and 2015 that involved the death of an older person or permanent severe choking-related injury. A database of court decisions (n = 23) was constructed according to patient and caregiver characteristics, and nursing services. An analysis was performed on caregiver liability, and to identify factors related to choking accidents.

RESULTS

The court ruled that the caregiver was liable in 10 of the 23 cases. Liability was related to appropriate food choices, failure to monitor of eating or the non-performance of resuscitation after an accident. Prior knowledge of aspiration (P < .001), inappropriate assistance during the meal (P < .001), and inappropriate emergency treatment (P = .028) were more likely to be present in cases in which caregivers were judged liable than in those in which they were not.

CONCLUSIONS

Lack of appropriate assistance during the meal was the factor most strongly associated with a court ruling of caregiver liability for choking accidents in older people.

摘要

目的

分析日本的医疗事故诉讼案例,确定与老年人噎食事故相关的因素。

背景

老年人噎食较为常见,且可能产生严重后果。

方法

本研究分析了 2000 年至 2015 年间在日本发生的与噎食相关的老年人死亡或永久性严重伤害的事故案例的法庭判决,这些案例涉及到老年人。根据患者和护理人员的特点以及护理服务,建立了一个包含 23 例案例的法庭判决数据库。对护理人员的责任进行了分析,并确定了与噎食事故相关的因素。

结果

在 23 例案例中,有 10 例法庭裁定护理人员负有责任。责任与适当的食物选择、未能对进食进行监控或事故发生后未进行复苏有关。有过吸入史(P<0.001)、用餐时提供不当帮助(P<0.001)和不适当的急救处理(P=0.028)的情况下,护理人员被判定负有责任的可能性更高。

结论

用餐时缺乏适当的帮助是与老年人噎食事故中护理人员责任判定最相关的因素。

相似文献

1
Medical malpractice litigation related to choking accidents in older people in Japan.日本老年人噎食事故相关的医疗事故诉讼
Gerodontology. 2021 Mar;38(1):104-112. doi: 10.1111/ger.12506. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
2
Dentists' Legal Liability and Duty of Explanation in Dental Malpractice Litigation in Japan.日本牙科医疗事故诉讼中牙医的法律责任及说明义务
Int Dent J. 2021 Aug;71(4):300-308. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2020.12.004. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
3
Physicians' communication skills with patients and legal liability in decided medical malpractice litigation cases in Japan.日本已判决的医疗事故诉讼案件中医生与患者的沟通技巧及法律责任
BMC Fam Pract. 2008 Jul 25;9:43. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-9-43.
4
Standard of care and liability in medical malpractice litigation in Japan.日本医疗事故诉讼中的医疗护理标准与责任
Health Policy. 2003 Aug;65(2):119-27. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(02)00214-2.
5
Lasers and losers in the eyes of the law: liability for head and neck procedures.法律视角下的激光与失败者:头颈部手术的责任
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2014 Jul-Aug;16(4):277-83. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2014.21.
6
Association between civil procedure and medical malpractice litigation in Japan.日本民事诉讼与医疗事故诉讼之间的关联
Med Law. 2004;23(2):269-88.
7
Liability immunity as a legal defense for recent emergency medical services system litigation.责任豁免作为近期紧急医疗服务系统诉讼的法律抗辩理由。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 1995 Apr-Jun;10(2):82-90; discussion 90-1. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00041777.
8
Epidemiology of Food Choking Deaths in Japan: Time Trends and Regional Variations.日本食物性窒息死亡的流行病学:时间趋势和地域差异。
J Epidemiol. 2021 May 5;31(5):356-360. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20200057. Epub 2020 Jun 13.
9
COMPENSATING CEREBRAL PALSY CASES: PROBLEMS IN COURT LITIGATION AND THE NO-FAULT ALTERNATIVE.
Med Law. 2015 Sep;34(1):335-355.
10
Trend of Malpractice Litigation against Neurosurgeons in Japan: An Analysis of Disclosed Database by Courts in Japan from 2001 through 2015.日本神经外科医生医疗事故诉讼趋势:对日本法院2001年至2015年公开数据库的分析
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2017 Aug 15;57(8):426-432. doi: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2017-0049. Epub 2017 Jun 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors related to liability for damages for adverse events occurring in long-term care facilities.与长期护理机构不良事件损害赔偿责任相关的因素。
PLoS One. 2023 May 19;18(5):e0283332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283332. eCollection 2023.
2
Adverse Events and Risk Management in Residential Aged Care Facilities: A Cross-Sectional Study in Hunan, China.中国湖南地区养老院的不良事件与风险管理:一项横断面研究
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022 Mar 29;15:529-542. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S351821. eCollection 2022.