• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与长期护理机构不良事件损害赔偿责任相关的因素。

Factors related to liability for damages for adverse events occurring in long-term care facilities.

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki-shi, Nagasaki, Japan.

Graduate School of Health Management, Faculty of Nursing and Medical Care, Keio University, Fujisawa-shi, Kanagawa, Japan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 May 19;18(5):e0283332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283332. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0283332
PMID:37205652
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10198560/
Abstract

Globally, residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs) often experience adverse events (AEs) and corresponding lawsuits that result in suffering among the residents, their families, and the facilities. Hence, we conducted a study to clarify the factors related to the facilities' liabilities for damages for the AEs that occur at LTCFs in Japan. We analyzed 1,495 AE reports from LTCFs in one Japanese city. A binomial logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with liability for damages. The independent variables were classified as: residents, organizations, and social factors. In total, 14% of AEs resulted in the facility being liable for damages. The predictors of liability for damages were as follows: for the resident factors, the increased need for care had an adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of 2.00 and care levels of 2-3; and AOR of 2.48 and care levels of 4-5. The types of injuries, such as bruises, wounds, and fractures, had AORs of 3.16, 2.62, and 2.50, respectively. Regarding the organization factors, the AE time, such as noon or evening, had an AOR of 1.85. If the AE occurred indoors, the AOR was 2.78, and if it occurred during staff care, the AOR was 2.11. For any follow-ups requiring consultation with a doctor, the AOR was 4.70, and for hospitalization, the AOR was 1.76. Regarding the type of LTCF providing medical care in addition to residential care, the AOR was 4.39. Regarding the social factors, the reports filed before 2017 had an AOR of 0.58. The results of the organization factors suggest that liability tends to arise in situations where the residents and their family expect high quality care. Therefore, it is imperative to strengthen organizational factors in such situations to avoid AEs and the resulting liability for damages.

摘要

在全球范围内,长期护理机构(LTCF)的居民经常经历不良事件(AEs)和相应的诉讼,导致居民、他们的家人和机构遭受痛苦。因此,我们进行了一项研究,以澄清与日本 LTCF 发生的 AEs 相关的设施损害赔偿责任的因素。我们分析了一个日本城市的 1495 份 LTCF 的 AE 报告。采用二项逻辑回归分析确定与损害赔偿责任相关的因素。自变量分为:居民、组织和社会因素。总的来说,14%的 AE 导致设施承担损害赔偿责任。损害赔偿责任的预测因子如下:对于居民因素,增加的护理需求调整后的优势比(AOR)为 2.00,护理水平为 2-3;AOR 为 2.48,护理水平为 4-5。伤害类型,如瘀伤、伤口和骨折,分别有 AOR 为 3.16、2.62 和 2.50。关于组织因素,AE 时间,如中午或晚上,有一个 AOR 为 1.85。如果 AE 发生在室内,AOR 为 2.78,如果发生在员工护理期间,AOR 为 2.11。任何需要咨询医生的后续行动,AOR 为 4.70,住院治疗,AOR 为 1.76。关于除住宅护理外还提供医疗护理的 LTCF 类型,AOR 为 4.39。关于社会因素,2017 年之前提交的报告 AOR 为 0.58。组织因素的结果表明,在居民及其家属期望高质量护理的情况下,责任往往会产生。因此,在这种情况下,必须加强组织因素,以避免 AE 和由此产生的损害赔偿责任。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/020d/10198560/a1ce3fef6b44/pone.0283332.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/020d/10198560/9185f3ad7523/pone.0283332.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/020d/10198560/a1ce3fef6b44/pone.0283332.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/020d/10198560/9185f3ad7523/pone.0283332.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/020d/10198560/a1ce3fef6b44/pone.0283332.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Factors related to liability for damages for adverse events occurring in long-term care facilities.与长期护理机构不良事件损害赔偿责任相关的因素。
PLoS One. 2023 May 19;18(5):e0283332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283332. eCollection 2023.
2
Characteristics of long-term care facilities associated with standing order programs to deliver influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations to residents in 13 states.与13个州向居民提供流感和肺炎球菌疫苗接种的长期医嘱项目相关的长期护理机构的特征
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2005 Mar-Apr;6(2):97-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2004.12.020.
3
Remote infection control assessments in long-term care facilities during COVID-19 pandemic in Texas, 2020.2020 年德克萨斯州 COVID-19 大流行期间长期护理机构的远程感染控制评估。
Am J Infect Control. 2022 Oct;50(10):1110-1117. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2022.07.007.
4
Statin use and fall-related hospitalizations among residents of long-term care facilities: A case-control study.长期护理机构居民使用他汀类药物与跌倒相关的住院情况:病例对照研究。
J Clin Lipidol. 2020 Jul-Aug;14(4):507-514. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2020.05.008. Epub 2020 May 22.
5
Contributing Factors to Adverse Events in Long-Term Care Facilities in Ireland, a Content Analysis.爱尔兰长期护理机构不良事件的促成因素:内容分析。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024 Apr;25(4):633-638.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.11.015. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
6
Impact of family involvement and an advance directive to not hospitalize on hospital transfers of residents in long-term care facilities.家庭参与和不住院预先指示对长期护理机构居民医院转院的影响。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2024 Feb;117:105183. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2023.105183. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
7
Practice guideline for evaluation of fever and infection in long-term care facilities.长期护理机构中发热与感染评估的实践指南。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001 Feb;49(2):210-22. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49999.x.
8
Latent Tuberculosis Infection Testing Practices in Long-Term Care Facilities, Boston, Massachusetts.马萨诸塞州波士顿长期护理机构中的潜伏性结核感染检测实践
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Jun;65(6):1145-1151. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14696. Epub 2017 May 3.
9
Risk factors for pneumonia and influenza hospitalizations in long-term care facility residents: a retrospective cohort study.长期护理机构居民肺炎和流感住院的风险因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Feb 10;20(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-1457-8.
10
Contribution of facility level factors to variation in antibiotic use in long-term care facilities: a national cohort study.医疗机构因素对长期护理机构抗生素使用差异的影响:一项全国队列研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021 Apr 13;76(5):1339-1348. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkab007.

本文引用的文献

1
Nurse staffing, missed care, quality of care and adverse events: A cross-sectional study.护士人力配置、遗漏护理、护理质量和不良事件:一项横断面研究。
J Nurs Manag. 2022 Mar;30(2):447-454. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13501. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
2
Predicting incidence of long-term care insurance certification in Japan with the Kihon Checklist for frailty screening tool: analysis of local government survey data.使用 Kihon 虚弱筛查工具预测日本长期护理保险认证的发生率:对地方政府调查数据的分析。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Jan 7;21(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01968-z.
3
Medical malpractice litigation related to choking accidents in older people in Japan.
日本老年人噎食事故相关的医疗事故诉讼
Gerodontology. 2021 Mar;38(1):104-112. doi: 10.1111/ger.12506. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
4
An investigation of the effects of walking frame height and width on walking stability.步行架高度和宽度对行走稳定性影响的研究。
Gait Posture. 2020 Oct;82:248-253. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.09.017. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
5
Perception Gaps of Disclosure of Patient Safety Incidents Between Nurses and the General Public in Korea.护士和公众对韩国患者安全事件披露的认知差距。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Dec 1;17(8):e971-e975. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000781.
6
Medical negligence - Key cases and application of legislation.医疗过失——关键案例及立法应用
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Jul 17;57:205-211. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.07.017. eCollection 2020 Sep.
7
General Public's Attitudes Toward Disclosure of Patient Safety Incidents in Korea: Results of Disclosure of Patient Safety Incidents Survey I.公众对韩国患者安全事件披露的态度:患者安全事件披露调查 I 的结果。
J Patient Saf. 2020 Mar;16(1):84-89. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000428.
8
Rebuilding and guiding a care community: A grounded theory of end-of-life nursing care practice in long-term care settings.重建和引导关怀社区:长期护理环境中临终护理实践的扎根理论。
J Adv Nurs. 2020 Apr;76(4):1009-1018. doi: 10.1111/jan.14294. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
9
Adverse Events in Long-term Care Residents Transitioning From Hospital Back to Nursing Home.从医院转回疗养院的长期护理居民中的不良事件。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Sep 1;179(9):1254-1261. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.2005.
10
Coordination of trunk and foot acceleration during gait is affected by walking velocity and fall history in elderly adults.老年人在行走时躯干和脚加速度的协调受行走速度和跌倒史的影响。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2019 Jul;31(7):943-950. doi: 10.1007/s40520-018-1036-4. Epub 2018 Sep 7.