• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

语言有重量:语言作为内在基础和抽象概念灵活性的来源。

Words have a weight: language as a source of inner grounding and flexibility in abstract concepts.

机构信息

University of Louisville, Louisville, USA.

Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies of the Italian National Research Council (ISTC-CNR), Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2022 Nov;86(8):2451-2467. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01438-6.

DOI:10.1007/s00426-020-01438-6
PMID:33170357
Abstract

The role played by language in our cognitive lives is a topic at the centre of contemporary debates in cognitive (neuro)science. In this paper we illustrate and compare two theories that offer embodied explanations of this role: the WAT (words as social tools) and the LENS (language is an embodied neuroenhancement and scaffold) theories. WAT and LENS differ from other current proposals, because they connect the impact of the neurologically realized language system on our cognition to the ways in which language shapes our interaction with the physical and social environment. Examining these theories together, their tenets and supporting evidence, sharpens our understanding of each, but also contributes to a better understanding of the contribution that language might make to the acquisition, representation and use of abstract concepts. Here we focus on how language provides a source of inner grounding, especially metacognition and inner speech, and supports the flexibility of our thought. Overall, the paper outlines a promising research program focused on the importance of language to abstract concepts within the context of a flexible, multimodal, and multilevel conception of embodied cognition.

摘要

语言在我们认知生活中所扮演的角色是认知(神经)科学当代辩论的核心主题。在本文中,我们将举例说明并比较两种提供语言作用的具身解释的理论:WAT(语言作为社会工具)和 LENS(语言是一种具身的神经增强和支架)理论。WAT 和 LENS 与其他当前的提议不同,因为它们将神经系统实现的语言系统对我们认知的影响与语言塑造我们与物理和社会环境相互作用的方式联系起来。同时考察这些理论、它们的原则和支持证据,不仅可以更深入地理解每一种理论,还可以帮助我们更好地理解语言可能对抽象概念的习得、表现和使用做出的贡献。在这里,我们重点关注语言如何提供内在基础,特别是元认知和内部言语,并支持我们思维的灵活性。总的来说,本文概述了一个很有前景的研究计划,该计划侧重于语言在具身认知的灵活、多模态和多层次概念背景下对抽象概念的重要性。

相似文献

1
Words have a weight: language as a source of inner grounding and flexibility in abstract concepts.语言有重量:语言作为内在基础和抽象概念灵活性的来源。
Psychol Res. 2022 Nov;86(8):2451-2467. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01438-6.
2
Words as social tools: Language, sociality and inner grounding in abstract concepts.言语即社会工具:语言、社会性与抽象概念的内在基础
Phys Life Rev. 2019 Jul;29:120-153. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2018.12.001. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
3
Varieties of abstract concepts: development, use and representation in the brain.抽象概念的多样性:大脑中的发展、使用和表现。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Aug 5;373(1752). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0121.
4
A Future of Words: Language and the Challenge of Abstract Concepts.文字的未来:语言与抽象概念的挑战
J Cogn. 2020 Oct 23;3(1):42. doi: 10.5334/joc.134.
5
Abstract concepts, language and sociality: from acquisition to inner speech.抽象概念、语言和社会性:从习得到内部言语。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Aug 5;373(1752). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0134.
6
Editorial concepts in interaction: social engagement and inner experiences.互动中的编辑理念:社会参与和内心体验。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Feb 13;378(1870):20210351. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0351. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
7
More than a scaffold: Language is a neuroenhancement.不只是支架:语言是一种神经增强。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2020 Jul-Sep;37(5-6):288-311. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2019.1637338. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
8
Rethinking the role of language in embodied cognition.重新思考语言在具身认知中的作用。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Feb 13;378(1870):20210375. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0375. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
9
Abstract concepts: external influences, internal constraints, and methodological issues.抽象概念:外部影响、内部约束和方法问题。
Psychol Res. 2022 Nov;86(8):2370-2388. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01698-4.
10
Articulatory suppression delays processing of abstract words: The role of inner speech.发音抑制延迟了抽象词汇的加工:内言语的作用。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022 Jul;75(7):1343-1354. doi: 10.1177/17470218211053623. Epub 2021 Oct 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of pacifier use and parenting characteristics on toddlers' vocabulary development.安抚奶嘴使用和育儿特征对幼儿词汇发展的影响。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 23;16:1599801. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1599801. eCollection 2025.
2
Abstract words are hard to acquire; Does social relevance help?抽象词汇难以习得;社会关联性有帮助吗?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Jun 24. doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02719-0.
3
Fine-Grained Concreteness Effects on Word Processing and Representation Across Three Tasks: An ERP Study.三项任务中细粒度具体性对词汇加工与表征的影响:一项事件相关电位研究

本文引用的文献

1
Touch me if you can: The intangible but grounded nature of abstract concepts.摸我一下,如果你可以:抽象概念无形但有形的本质。
Behav Brain Sci. 2020 Jun 19;43:e123. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X19003091.
2
Different kinds of embodied language: A comparison between Italian and Persian languages.不同种类的身势语:意大利语和波斯语的比较。
Brain Cogn. 2020 Jul;142:105581. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105581. Epub 2020 May 19.
3
Two Forms of Knowledge Representations in the Human Brain.人类大脑中的两种知识表示形式。
Psychophysiology. 2025 May;62(5):e70074. doi: 10.1111/psyp.70074.
4
Mapping Contributions of the Anterior Temporal Semantic Hub to the Processing of Abstract and Concrete Verbs.绘制颞前叶语义中枢对抽象动词和具体动词加工的贡献
Hum Brain Mapp. 2025 Apr 15;46(6):e70210. doi: 10.1002/hbm.70210.
5
Contrasting the organization of concrete and abstract word meanings.对比具体词汇和抽象词汇意义的组织方式。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Mar 3. doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02671-z.
6
Motor strength as a feature of concepts and visual representations.作为概念和视觉表征特征的运动强度。
Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 12;15:1164836. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1164836. eCollection 2024.
7
A novel image database for social concepts reveals preference biases in autistic spectrum in adults and children.一个新的社会概念图像数据库揭示了成年和儿童孤独症谱系中的偏好偏见。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Aug;31(4):1690-1703. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02443-7. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
8
The language of marketing hyperbole and consumer perception-The case of Glasgow.营销夸张语言和消费者认知——以格拉斯哥为例。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 20;18(12):e0295132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295132. eCollection 2023.
9
CONcreTEXT norms: Concreteness ratings for Italian and English words in context.CONcreTEXT 规范:语境中意大利语和英语单词的具体性评级。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 20;18(10):e0293031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293031. eCollection 2023.
10
Consensus Paper: Current Perspectives on Abstract Concepts and Future Research Directions.共识文件:抽象概念的当前观点与未来研究方向
J Cogn. 2023 Oct 10;6(1):62. doi: 10.5334/joc.238. eCollection 2023.
Neuron. 2020 Jul 22;107(2):383-393.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.04.010. Epub 2020 May 7.
4
Overusing the pacifier during infancy sets a footprint on abstract words processing.婴儿期过度使用奶嘴会对抽象词汇处理产生影响。
J Child Lang. 2020 Sep;47(5):1084-1099. doi: 10.1017/S0305000920000070. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
5
The Pacified Face: Early Embodiment Processes and the Use of Dummies.平静的面容:早期具身化过程与玩偶的使用
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 13;11:387. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00387. eCollection 2020.
6
Concrete vs. Abstract Semantics: From Mental Representations to Functional Brain Mapping.具体语义与抽象语义:从心理表征到功能性脑图谱
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Aug 2;13:267. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00267. eCollection 2019.
7
Words as social tools: Flexibility, situatedness, language and sociality in abstract concepts: Reply to comments on "Words as social tools: Language, sociality and inner grounding in abstract concepts".作为社会工具的词汇:抽象概念中的灵活性、情境性、语言与社会性:对《作为社会工具的词汇:抽象概念中的语言、社会性与内在基础》评论的回应
Phys Life Rev. 2019 Jul;29:178-184. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2019.06.004. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
8
Using second-person neuroscience to elucidate the mechanisms of social interaction.运用第二人称神经科学阐明社会互动的机制。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2019 Aug;20(8):495-505. doi: 10.1038/s41583-019-0179-4.
9
Sociality to Reach Objects and to Catch Meaning.触及物体并理解意义的社交性。
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 24;10:838. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00838. eCollection 2019.
10
Sensitivity to emotion information in children's lexical processing.儿童词汇加工中对情绪信息的敏感性。
Cognition. 2019 Sep;190:61-71. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.04.017. Epub 2019 Apr 23.