Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, P.O. Box 26170, Greensboro, NC, 27402-6170, USA.
Behavioral Science Division, VA Boston Healthcare System, National Center for PTSD, Boston, USA.
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2021 Mar;46(1):83-90. doi: 10.1007/s10484-020-09493-w. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
Research on effort and motivation commonly assesses how the sympathetic branch of the autonomic nervous system affects the cardiovascular system. The cardiac pre-ejection period (PEP), assessed via impedance cardiography, is a common outcome, but assessing PEP requires identifying subtle points on cardiac waveforms. The present research examined the psychometric value of the RZ interval (RZ), which has recently been proposed as an indicator of sympathetic activity, for effort research. Also known as the initial systolic time interval (ISTI), RZ is the time (in ms) between the ECG R peak and the dZ/dt Z peak. Unlike PEP, RZ involves salient waveform points that are easily and reliably identified. Data from two experiments evaluated the suitability of RZ for effort paradigms and compared it to a popular automated PEP method. In Studies 1 (n = 89) and 2 (n = 71), participants completed a standard appetitive task in which each correct response earned a small amount of cash. As expected, incentives significantly affected PEP and RZ in both experiments. PEP and RZ were highly correlated (all rs ≥ 0.89), and RZ consistently yielded a larger effect size than PEP. In Study 3, a quantitative synthesis of the experiments indicated that the effect size of RZ's response to incentives (Hedges's g = 0.432 [0.310, 0.554]) was roughly 15% larger than PEP's effect size (g = 0.376 [0.256, 0.496]). RZ thus appears promising for future research on sympathetic aspects of effort-related cardiac activity.
研究努力和动机通常评估自主神经系统的交感分支如何影响心血管系统。通过阻抗心动描记法评估的心脏射血前期(PEP)是一种常见的结果,但评估 PEP 需要识别心脏波形上的细微点。本研究考察了 RZ 间期(RZ)的心理测量值,RZ 最近被提议作为交感活动的指标,用于努力研究。RZ 也称为初始收缩时间间隔(ISTI),是 ECG R 峰和 dZ/dt Z 峰之间的时间(以 ms 为单位)。与 PEP 不同,RZ 涉及易于识别的明显波形点。两项实验的数据评估了 RZ 用于努力范式的适用性,并将其与一种流行的自动 PEP 方法进行了比较。在研究 1(n=89)和研究 2(n=71)中,参与者完成了一项标准的诱人任务,每正确回答一个问题就可以获得少量现金。正如预期的那样,奖励在两项实验中都显著影响 PEP 和 RZ。PEP 和 RZ 高度相关(所有 rs≥0.89),并且 RZ 始终产生比 PEP 更大的效应量。在研究 3 中,对实验的定量综合表明,激励对 RZ 反应的效应大小(Hedges 的 g=0.432 [0.310, 0.554])比 PEP 的效应大小(g=0.376 [0.256, 0.496])大约大 15%。因此,RZ 似乎很有希望用于未来与努力相关的心脏活动的交感方面的研究。