Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 10;15(11):e0241870. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241870. eCollection 2020.
Understanding the factors that influence predator-prey dynamics requires an investigation of oscillations in predator and prey population sizes over time. However, empirical studies are often performed over one or fewer predator generations. This is particularly true for studies addressing the non-consumptive effects of predators on prey. In a previous study that lasted less than one predator generation, we demonstrated that two species of parasitoid wasps additively suppressed aphid populations through a combination of consumptive and non-consumptive effects. However, the non-consumptive effects of one wasp reduced the reproductive success of the other, suggesting that a longer-term experiment may have revealed antagonism between the wasps. The goal of our current study is to evaluate multi-generation consumptive and non-consumptive interactions between pea aphids (Acyrthosiphon pisum) and the wasps Aphidius ervi and Aphidius colemani. Aphidius ervi is a common natural enemy of pea aphids. Aphidius colemani is a non-consumptive enemy that does not consume pea aphids, but negatively affects pea aphid performance through behavioral disturbance. Large field cages were installed to monitor aphid abundance in response to the presence and absence of both species of wasp over four weeks (two parasitoid generations). We found that the non-consumptive enemy A. colemani initially controlled the pea aphid population, but control in the absence of parasitism was not sustainable over the long term. Aphidius ervi suppressed pea aphids through a combination of consumptive and non-consumptive effects. This suppression was more effective than that of A. colemani, but aphid abundance fluctuated over time. Suppression by A. ervi and A. colemani together was complementary, leading to the most effective and stable control of pea aphids. Therefore, promoting a diverse natural enemy community that contributes to pest control through consumptive and non-consumptive interactions may enhance the stability of herbivore population suppression over time.
理解影响捕食者-猎物动态的因素需要调查捕食者和猎物种群数量随时间的波动。然而,实证研究通常在一个或更少的捕食者世代内进行。对于研究捕食者对猎物的非消耗性影响的研究尤其如此。在一项持续时间不到一个捕食者世代的先前研究中,我们证明了两种寄生蜂通过消耗和非消耗性作用的组合,对蚜虫种群具有附加抑制作用。然而,一种黄蜂的非消耗性效应降低了另一种黄蜂的繁殖成功率,这表明一个更长期的实验可能揭示了黄蜂之间的拮抗作用。我们目前研究的目的是评估豌豆蚜(Acyrthosiphon pisum)和黄蜂 Aphidius ervi 和 Aphidius colemani 之间多世代的消耗和非消耗性相互作用。Aphidius ervi 是豌豆蚜的常见天敌。Aphidius colemani 是一种非消耗性的天敌,它不消耗豌豆蚜,但通过行为干扰对豌豆蚜的性能产生负面影响。安装了大型田间笼子来监测蚜虫的丰度,以响应两周(两个寄生世代)内两种黄蜂的存在和不存在。我们发现,非消耗性天敌 A. colemani 最初控制了豌豆蚜种群,但在没有寄生的情况下,长期内无法维持控制。Aphidius ervi 通过消耗和非消耗性作用的组合来抑制豌豆蚜。这种抑制作用比 A. colemani 更有效,但蚜虫数量随时间波动。A. ervi 和 A. colemani 的抑制作用是互补的,导致对豌豆蚜的最有效和稳定的控制。因此,促进通过消耗和非消耗性相互作用有助于控制害虫的多样化天敌群落,可能会随着时间的推移增强对食草动物种群抑制的稳定性。