Oxford Wildlife Trade Research Group, Oxford, United Kingdom; Oxford Brookes University, Headington Road, OX3 0BP, Oxford, United Kingdom; RedeFauna - Rede de Pesquisa em Diversidade, Conservação e Uso da Fauna da Amazônia, Brazil.
Oxford Wildlife Trade Research Group, Oxford, United Kingdom; UWA Business School, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley, 6009, Perth, Australia.
Environ Res. 2021 Feb;193:110439. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110439. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
Wildlife trade has been widely discussed as a likely origin of the COVID-19 pandemic. It remains unclear how the main actors in the wildlife trade chain responded to these discussions and to the campaigns advocating wildlife trade bans. We analyzed the content of ~20,000 posts on 41 Facebook groups devoted to wild pet trade and ran a breakpoint and a content analysis to assess when and how the COVID-19 pandemic was incorporated into the discourse within trade communities. Only 0.44% of advertisements mentioned COVID-19, mostly after WHO declared COVID-19 a pandemic. No traders discussed the role of trade in spreading diseases; instead, posts stimulated the trade in wild species during lockdown. COVID-19 potentially offers persuasive arguments for reducing wildlife trade and consumption. This effect was not demonstrated by on-the-ground actors involved in this market. Bans in wildlife trade will not be sufficient and additional strategies are clearly needed.
野生动物交易被广泛讨论为 COVID-19 大流行的可能起源。目前仍不清楚野生动物交易链中的主要参与者如何应对这些讨论以及支持野生动物交易禁令的运动。我们分析了 41 个专门讨论野生动物宠物交易的 Facebook 群组中约 20000 条帖子的内容,并进行了断点和内容分析,以评估 COVID-19 何时以及如何被纳入贸易社区的讨论中。只有 0.44%的广告提到了 COVID-19,主要是在世界卫生组织宣布 COVID-19 为大流行之后。没有交易员讨论贸易在传播疾病方面的作用;相反,帖子在封锁期间刺激了野生动物的交易。COVID-19 可能为减少野生动物贸易和消费提供了有说服力的论据。但这一效果并没有被参与这一市场的实际行动者所证明。仅仅禁止野生动物交易是不够的,显然还需要采取其他策略。