Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, 2130 Taubman Center, SPC 5340, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, 2130 Taubman Center, SPC 5340, Ann Arbor, MI, United States; National Clinician Scholars Program, University of Michigan Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, 2800 Plymouth Rd, North Campus Research Complex, Building 16, Ann Arbor, MI United States.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021 Jan;74(1):30-40. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.10.005. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
BACKGROUND: Although acellular dermal matrix (ADM) is widely used in expander-implant-based breast reconstructions, previous analyses have been unable to demonstrate improvements in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) with this approach over non-ADM procedures. This study aims to develop a more selective, evidence-based approach to the use of ADM in expander-implant-based breast reconstruction by identifying patient subgroups in which ADM improved clinical outcomes and PROs. STUDY DESIGN: The Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study prospectively evaluated immediate expander-implant reconstructions at 11 centers from 2012 to 2015. Complications (any/overall and major), and PROs (satisfaction, physical, psychosocial, and sexual well-being) were assessed two years postoperatively using medical records and the BREAST-Q, respectively. Using mixed-models accounting for centers and with interaction terms, we analyzed for differential ADM effects across various clinical subgroups, including age, body mass index, radiation timing, and chemotherapy. RESULTS: Expander-implant-based breast reconstruction was performed in 1451 patients, 738 with and 713 without ADM. Major complication risk was higher in ADM users vs. nonusers (22.9% vs. 16.4% and p = 0.04). Major complication risk with ADM increased with higher BMI (BMI=30, OR=1.70; BMI=35, OR=2.29, interaction p = 0.02). No significant ADM effects were observed for breast satisfaction, psychosocial, sexual, and physical well-being within any subgroups. CONCLUSION: In immediate expander-implant-based breast reconstruction, ADM was associated with a greater risk of major complications, particularly in high-BMI patients. We were unable to identify patient subgroups where ADM was associated with significant improvements in PROs. Given these findings and the financial costs of ADM, a more critical approach to the use of ADM in expander-implant reconstruction may be warranted.
背景:尽管脱细胞真皮基质(ADM)在基于扩张器-植入物的乳房重建中被广泛应用,但之前的分析未能证明与非 ADM 手术相比,该方法在患者报告的结果(PRO)方面有所改善。本研究旨在通过确定 ADM 改善临床结果和 PRO 的患者亚组,为基于扩张器-植入物的乳房重建中 ADM 的使用提供一种更具选择性、基于证据的方法。
研究设计:乳房切除术重建结果联合会研究前瞻性地评估了 2012 年至 2015 年期间 11 个中心的即刻扩张器-植入物重建。使用病历和 BREAST-Q 分别在术后两年评估并发症(任何/总体和主要)和 PRO(满意度、身体、心理社会和性健康)。使用考虑中心和交互项的混合模型,我们分析了 ADM 在各种临床亚组(包括年龄、体重指数、放射治疗时间和化疗)中的差异效果。
结果:1451 例患者接受了基于扩张器-植入物的乳房重建,其中 738 例使用了 ADM,713 例未使用 ADM。ADM 使用者的主要并发症风险高于非使用者(22.9%对 16.4%,p=0.04)。ADM 使用者的主要并发症风险随 BMI 升高而增加(BMI=30,OR=1.70;BMI=35,OR=2.29,交互 p=0.02)。在任何亚组中,ADM 对乳房满意度、心理社会、性和身体健康方面的 PRO 均无显著影响。
结论:在即刻扩张器-植入物乳房重建中,ADM 与主要并发症的风险增加相关,特别是在高 BMI 患者中。我们未能确定 ADM 与 PRO 显著改善相关的患者亚组。鉴于这些发现和 ADM 的经济成本,对基于扩张器-植入物的重建中 ADM 的使用可能需要采取更具批判性的方法。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021-1
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014-1-23
Ann Plast Surg. 2022-5-1
Plast Surg (Oakv). 2024-11
Front Transplant. 2023-3-10
JPRAS Open. 2023-5-9
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023-2-22