文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

制定基于循证的方法,以在即刻扩张器-植入物乳房重建中使用脱细胞真皮基质。

Development of an evidence-based approach to the use of acellular dermal matrix in immediate expander-implant-based breast reconstruction.

机构信息

Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, 2130 Taubman Center, SPC 5340, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.

Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, 2130 Taubman Center, SPC 5340, Ann Arbor, MI, United States; National Clinician Scholars Program, University of Michigan Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, 2800 Plymouth Rd, North Campus Research Complex, Building 16, Ann Arbor, MI United States.

出版信息

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021 Jan;74(1):30-40. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.10.005. Epub 2020 Oct 21.


DOI:10.1016/j.bjps.2020.10.005
PMID:33172826
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although acellular dermal matrix (ADM) is widely used in expander-implant-based breast reconstructions, previous analyses have been unable to demonstrate improvements in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) with this approach over non-ADM procedures. This study aims to develop a more selective, evidence-based approach to the use of ADM in expander-implant-based breast reconstruction by identifying patient subgroups in which ADM improved clinical outcomes and PROs. STUDY DESIGN: The Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study prospectively evaluated immediate expander-implant reconstructions at 11 centers from 2012 to 2015. Complications (any/overall and major), and PROs (satisfaction, physical, psychosocial, and sexual well-being) were assessed two years postoperatively using medical records and the BREAST-Q, respectively. Using mixed-models accounting for centers and with interaction terms, we analyzed for differential ADM effects across various clinical subgroups, including age, body mass index, radiation timing, and chemotherapy. RESULTS: Expander-implant-based breast reconstruction was performed in 1451 patients, 738 with and 713 without ADM. Major complication risk was higher in ADM users vs. nonusers (22.9% vs. 16.4% and p = 0.04). Major complication risk with ADM increased with higher BMI (BMI=30, OR=1.70; BMI=35, OR=2.29, interaction p = 0.02). No significant ADM effects were observed for breast satisfaction, psychosocial, sexual, and physical well-being within any subgroups. CONCLUSION: In immediate expander-implant-based breast reconstruction, ADM was associated with a greater risk of major complications, particularly in high-BMI patients. We were unable to identify patient subgroups where ADM was associated with significant improvements in PROs. Given these findings and the financial costs of ADM, a more critical approach to the use of ADM in expander-implant reconstruction may be warranted.

摘要

背景:尽管脱细胞真皮基质(ADM)在基于扩张器-植入物的乳房重建中被广泛应用,但之前的分析未能证明与非 ADM 手术相比,该方法在患者报告的结果(PRO)方面有所改善。本研究旨在通过确定 ADM 改善临床结果和 PRO 的患者亚组,为基于扩张器-植入物的乳房重建中 ADM 的使用提供一种更具选择性、基于证据的方法。

研究设计:乳房切除术重建结果联合会研究前瞻性地评估了 2012 年至 2015 年期间 11 个中心的即刻扩张器-植入物重建。使用病历和 BREAST-Q 分别在术后两年评估并发症(任何/总体和主要)和 PRO(满意度、身体、心理社会和性健康)。使用考虑中心和交互项的混合模型,我们分析了 ADM 在各种临床亚组(包括年龄、体重指数、放射治疗时间和化疗)中的差异效果。

结果:1451 例患者接受了基于扩张器-植入物的乳房重建,其中 738 例使用了 ADM,713 例未使用 ADM。ADM 使用者的主要并发症风险高于非使用者(22.9%对 16.4%,p=0.04)。ADM 使用者的主要并发症风险随 BMI 升高而增加(BMI=30,OR=1.70;BMI=35,OR=2.29,交互 p=0.02)。在任何亚组中,ADM 对乳房满意度、心理社会、性和身体健康方面的 PRO 均无显著影响。

结论:在即刻扩张器-植入物乳房重建中,ADM 与主要并发症的风险增加相关,特别是在高 BMI 患者中。我们未能确定 ADM 与 PRO 显著改善相关的患者亚组。鉴于这些发现和 ADM 的经济成本,对基于扩张器-植入物的重建中 ADM 的使用可能需要采取更具批判性的方法。

相似文献

[1]
Development of an evidence-based approach to the use of acellular dermal matrix in immediate expander-implant-based breast reconstruction.

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021-1

[2]
Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Multicenter Assessment of Risks and Benefits.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017-12

[3]
Does the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix Increase Postoperative Complications of the First-Stage Reconstruction of Immediate Expander-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Matched Cohort Study.

Ann Plast Surg. 2017-10

[4]
Outcomes after tissue expander exchange to implant in two-stage prepectoral breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix: A retrospective cohort study.

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024-2

[5]
Aseptic Freeze-Dried versus Sterile Wet-Packaged Human Cadaveric Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Propensity Score Analysis.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018-5

[6]
The cost effectiveness of acellular dermal matrix in expander-implant immediate breast reconstruction.

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014-1-23

[7]
Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction Without the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix: A 3-Year Review.

Ann Plast Surg. 2022-5-1

[8]
Outcomes of Acellular Dermal Matrix for Immediate Tissue Expander Reconstruction with Radiotherapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Aesthet Surg J. 2019-2-15

[9]
Review: Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy for Breast Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Prospective Studies Comparing Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM) Versus Without ADM.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2024-5

[10]
The Multi Centre Canadian Acellular Dermal Matrix Trial (MCCAT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial in implant-based breast reconstruction.

Trials. 2013-10-28

引用本文的文献

[1]
Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction in Patients with Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Curr Oncol. 2025-4-16

[2]
Immediate Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction Without Acellular Dermal Matrices: Preliminary Results.

Plast Surg (Oakv). 2024-11

[3]
Risk factor analysis and clinical experience of treating capsular contracture after prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction.

Gland Surg. 2024-6-30

[4]
To acellular dermal matrix or not to acellular dermal matrix?-outcomes of pre-pectoral prosthetic reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy with and without acellular dermal matrix.

Gland Surg. 2024-6-30

[5]
Acellular dermal matrix in reconstructive surgery: Applications, benefits, and cost.

Front Transplant. 2023-3-10

[6]
Review: Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy for Breast Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Prospective Studies Comparing Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM) Versus Without ADM.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2024-5

[7]
A Scoping Review of the Application of BREAST-Q in Surgical Research.

JPRAS Open. 2023-5-9

[8]
Trends and issues in clinical research on satisfaction and quality of life after mastectomy and breast reconstruction: a 5-year scoping review.

Int J Clin Oncol. 2023-7

[9]
Breast reconstruction: Review of current autologous and implant-based techniques and long-term oncologic outcome.

World J Clin Cases. 2023-4-6

[10]
Should Acellular Dermal Matrices Be Used for Implant-based Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy? Clinical Recommendation Based on the GRADE Approach.

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023-2-22

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索