Hou Ganggang, Zhao Wenyue, Jia Yuqin, Yuan Xinyu, Zhou Jian, Liu Tongjing, Hou Jirui
Unconventional Petroleum Research Institute, China University of Petroleum, Beijing, China.
Oil & Gas Technology Research Institute of Changqing Oilfield Company, Xi'an, China.
Front Chem. 2020 Oct 14;8:805. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2020.00805. eCollection 2020.
Much research has been carried out on nanoscale polymer microspheres (PMs) in laboratories in recent years. However, there are limited reports on the practical application of nanoscale PMs in ultralow permeability reservoirs. This paper reports a field application case of nanoscale PMs for in-depth profile control in the ultralow permeability oil reservoir. In the paper, the characteristics of the reservoir and the problems faced during development are analyzed in detail. Then, the PMs with calibration diameters of 300 nm and 800 nm are researched by evaluation experiments, and are selected for in-depth profile control in the ultralow permeability oil reservoir. Finally, according to the effect of the pilot application, the performance of PMs is evaluated, and a more suitable size for the pilot test reservoir is determined. The experiment's results show that the PMs have a good capacity for swelling and plugging. For the PMs with a calibration diameter of 300 nm, the final equilibrium swelling ratio is 56.2 nm·nm, and the maximum resistance coefficient and the blocking rate after swelling are 3.7 and 70.31%, respectively. For the PMs with a calibration diameter of 800 nm, the final equilibrium swelling ratio is 49.4 nm·nm, and the maximum resistance coefficient the blocking rate after swelling are 3.5 and 71.42%, respectively. The performance evaluation results show that nanoscale PMs can be used for in-depth profile control in the ultralow permeability oil reservoir. After the application of PMs in the pilot test area, the average water cut decreased by 10.4%, the average liquid production of single well-increased by 0.9 t/d, and the average thickness of the water-absorbing layer increased by 1.77 m. Comparing the dynamic data variation of well-groups using the PMs with the calibration diameter as 800 nm and the calibration diameter as 300 nm, it indicates that, for the pilot test area, PMs with a calibration diameter of 300 nm are more suitable than PMs with a calibration diameter of 800 nm.
近年来,实验室对纳米级聚合物微球(PMs)开展了大量研究。然而,关于纳米级PMs在超低渗透油藏实际应用的报道却很有限。本文报道了纳米级PMs在超低渗透油藏深部调剖的现场应用案例。文中详细分析了油藏特征及开发过程中面临的问题。然后,通过评价实验对校准直径为300nm和800nm的PMs进行了研究,并选择用于超低渗透油藏的深部调剖。最后,根据先导试验应用效果,对PMs性能进行评价,并确定了更适合先导试验区油藏的尺寸。实验结果表明,PMs具有良好的溶胀和封堵能力。对于校准直径为300nm的PMs,最终平衡溶胀比为56.2nm·nm,溶胀后最大阻力系数和封堵率分别为3.7和70.31%。对于校准直径为800nm的PMs,最终平衡溶胀比为49.4nm·nm,溶胀后最大阻力系数和封堵率分别为3.5和71.42%。性能评价结果表明,纳米级PMs可用于超低渗透油藏的深部调剖。在先导试验区应用PMs后,平均含水下降了10.4%,单井平均产液量增加了0.9t/d,吸水层平均厚度增加了1.77m。对比使用校准直径为800nm和300nm的PMs的井组动态数据变化情况表明,对于先导试验区,校准直径为300nm的PMs比校准直径为800nm的PMs更适用。