School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Australia.
Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Australia.
J Neurophysiol. 2021 Feb 1;125(2):385-397. doi: 10.1152/jn.00423.2020. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to improve single- and dual-task performance in healthy participants and enhance transferable training gains following multiple sessions of combined stimulation and task practice. However, it has yet to be determined what the optimal stimulation dose is for facilitating such outcomes. We aimed to test the effects of different tDCS intensities, with a commonly used electrode montage, on performance outcomes in a multisession single/dual-task training and transfer protocol. In a preregistered study, 123 participants, who were pseudorandomized across four groups, each completed six sessions (pre- and posttraining sessions and four combined tDCS and training sessions) and received 20 min of prefrontal anodal tDCS at 0.7, 1.0, or 2.0 mA or 15-s sham stimulation. Response time and accuracy were assessed in trained and untrained tasks. The 1.0-mA group showed substantial improvements in single-task reaction time and dual-task accuracy, with additional evidence for improvements in dual-task reaction times, relative to sham performance. This group also showed near transfer to the single-task component of an untrained multitasking paradigm. The 0.7- and 2.0-mA intensities varied in which performance measures they improved on the trained task, but in sum, the effects were less robust than for the 1.0-mA group, and there was no evidence for the transfer of performance. Our study highlights that training performance gains are augmented by tDCS, but their magnitude and nature are not uniform across stimulation intensity. Using techniques such as transcranial direct current stimulation to modulate cognitive performance is an alluring endeavor. However, the optimal parameters to augment performance are unknown. Here, in a preregistered study with a large sample (123 subjects), three different stimulation dosages (0.7, 1.0, and 2.0 mA) were applied during multitasking training. Different cognitive training performance outcomes occurred across the dosage conditions, with only one of the doses (1.0 mA) leading to training transfer.
经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)已被证明可改善健康参与者的单一任务和双重任务表现,并在多次联合刺激和任务练习后增强可转移的训练收益。然而,尚不确定促进这些结果的最佳刺激剂量是多少。我们旨在使用常用的电极布置测试不同 tDCS 强度对多次单一/双重任务训练和转移方案中的表现结果的影响。在一项预先注册的研究中,123 名参与者被随机分为四组,每组完成六次(训练前和训练后以及四次联合 tDCS 和训练),并接受 20 分钟的前额叶阳极 tDCS,电流强度为 0.7、1.0 或 2.0 mA 或 15 秒假刺激。在训练和未训练的任务中评估反应时间和准确性。1.0 mA 组在单一任务反应时间和双重任务准确性方面显示出实质性的改善,相对于假刺激,双重任务反应时间也有额外的改善证据。该组还显示出对未训练的多重任务范式的单一任务成分的近转移。0.7 和 2.0 mA 强度在改善训练任务的表现指标方面有所不同,但总的来说,效果不如 1.0 mA 组强,并且没有表现转移的证据。我们的研究表明,tDCS 增强了训练表现的收益,但它们的幅度和性质在刺激强度上并不统一。使用经颅直流电刺激等技术来调节认知表现是一项诱人的努力。然而,增强性能的最佳参数尚不清楚。在这里,在一项预先注册的具有大样本量(123 名受试者)的研究中,在多重任务训练期间应用了三种不同的刺激剂量(0.7、1.0 和 2.0 mA)。在剂量条件下出现了不同的认知训练表现结果,只有一种剂量(1.0 mA)导致了训练转移。