van der Groen Onno, Rafique Sara A, Willmot Nick, Murphy Margaret G, Tisnovsky Eulalia, Brunyé Tad T
Defence Science and Technology Group, Human and Decision Sciences, Department of Defence, Edinburgh, SA, Australia.
Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Mar 3;19:1501209. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1501209. eCollection 2025.
Electrical stimulation (ES), including transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) and transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS), has shown potential for cognitive enhancement in military contexts. Various types of ES, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), modulate neuronal membrane potentials and cortical excitability, potentially improving cognitive functions relevant to military training and operations.
This systematic review updates previous findings by examining studies published between 2019 and 2024 that investigated electrical stimulation effects on cognitive performance in military personnel and tasks. We focused on whether the studies addressed key questions about the generalizability of lab findings to military tasks, the frequency and intensity of adverse effects, the impact of repeated ES administration, and the ethical and regulatory considerations for its use in potentially vulnerable military populations.
Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria; most demonstrated overall low to some concerns, however, two of these had overall high risk of bias. While tES and tVNS showed some promise for enhancing multitasking and visual search performance, the results were mixed, with no reliable effects on vigilance tasks.
The reviewed studies highlight the need for a better understanding of ES mechanisms, optimal stimulation parameters, and individual differences in response to ES. They also highlight the importance of conducting high-powered research in military settings to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and ethical implications of ES. Future research should address the generalizability of lab-based results to real-world military tasks, monitor the frequency and intensity of adverse effects, and explore the long-term impacts of repeated administration. Furthermore, ethical and regulatory considerations are crucial for the responsible application of ES in military contexts, and a series of outstanding questions is posed to guide continuing research in this domain.
电刺激(ES),包括经颅电刺激(tES)和经皮迷走神经刺激(tVNS),已显示出在军事环境中增强认知能力的潜力。各种类型的电刺激,如经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)和经颅交流电刺激(tACS),可调节神经元膜电位和皮质兴奋性,有可能改善与军事训练和行动相关的认知功能。
本系统综述通过审查2019年至2024年期间发表的研究来更新先前的研究结果,这些研究调查了电刺激对军事人员认知表现和任务的影响。我们关注的是这些研究是否解决了关于实验室研究结果对军事任务的可推广性、不良反应的频率和强度、重复进行电刺激的影响以及在潜在易受影响的军事人群中使用电刺激的伦理和监管考虑等关键问题。
11项研究符合纳入标准;大多数研究总体显示出低至中等程度的问题,然而,其中两项研究总体存在高偏倚风险。虽然经颅电刺激和经皮迷走神经刺激在增强多任务处理和视觉搜索表现方面显示出一些前景,但结果不一,对警觉任务没有可靠影响。
所审查的研究强调需要更好地理解电刺激机制、最佳刺激参数以及对电刺激反应的个体差异。它们还强调了在军事环境中进行高功率研究以评估电刺激的疗效、安全性和伦理影响的重要性。未来的研究应解决基于实验室的结果对实际军事任务的可推广性问题,监测不良反应的频率和强度,并探索重复给药的长期影响。此外,伦理和监管考虑对于在军事环境中负责任地应用电刺激至关重要,本文提出了一系列突出问题以指导该领域的持续研究。