Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Hospital das Clínicas, Botucatu, SP, Brasil.
Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Programa de Pós-graduação em doenças infecciosas, Botucatu, SP, Brasil.
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2020 Nov 6;53:e20200527. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0527-2020. eCollection 2020.
Even though most current recommendations include the general use of masks to prevent community transmission of SARS-Cov-2, the effectiveness of this measure is still debated. The studies on this policy include physical filtering tests with inanimate microparticles, randomized clinical trials, observational studies, ecological analyses, and even computational modeling of epidemics. Much of the so-called evidence is inferred from studies on different respiratory viruses and epidemiological settings. Heterogeneity is a major factor limiting the generalization of inferences. In this article, we reviewed the empirical and rational bases of mask use and how to understand these recommendations compared to other policies of social distancing, restrictions on non-essential services, and lockdown. We conclude that recent studies suggest a synergistic effect of the use of masks and social distancing rather than opposing effects of the two recommendations. Developing social communication approaches that clarify the need to combine different strategies is a challenge for public health authorities.
尽管大多数当前的建议包括普遍使用口罩来预防 SARS-CoV-2 的社区传播,但这一措施的效果仍存在争议。关于这项政策的研究包括对无生命的微小颗粒进行物理过滤测试、随机临床试验、观察性研究、生态分析,甚至是传染病的计算建模。许多所谓的证据是从对不同呼吸道病毒和流行病学环境的研究中推断出来的。异质性是限制推理推广的主要因素。在本文中,我们回顾了口罩使用的经验和理性基础,以及如何将这些建议与其他政策(如社会隔离、限制非必要服务和封锁)进行比较。我们的结论是,最近的研究表明,口罩使用和社会隔离具有协同作用,而不是这两种建议的相反作用。制定明确需要结合不同策略的社会沟通方法是公共卫生当局面临的挑战。