Department of Medicine and Clinical Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Department of Health Care Administration and Management, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020;49(6):601-608. doi: 10.1159/000510773. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
This study aimed to determine whether use of oral anticoagulants (OACs) was associated with a reduced risk of recurrent stroke compared with use of antiplatelets (APs) in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) having no potential source of embolism.
Of 8,790 patients with acute ischemic stroke registered at 7 centers in the Fukuoka Stroke Registry from June 2007 to May 2017, we included 681 patients (mean age 69.7 [SD 14.1] years, 48.3% men) who experienced ESUS without a potential source of embolism and received OAC alone or AP alone. We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidential intervals (CIs) of recurrent ischemic stroke or any stroke after discharge using a Cox proportional hazards model and Fine and Gray model.
During a mean follow-up of 3.4 (SD 1.7) years, event rates of recurrent ischemic stroke were 4.4 per 100 person-years in 489 patients treated with AP and 2.0 per 100 person-years in 192 patients treated with OAC. OAC use was associated with a reduced risk of recurrent ischemic stroke, even after adjusting for potential confounding factors (multivariable-adjusted HR [95% CI], 0.42 [0.23-0.80]) and when additionally considering death as a competing risk (0.45 [0.24-0.85]). The reduced risk of recurrent ischemic stroke was still observed in patients treated with OAC (0.32 [0.15-0.67]) in reference to propensity score-matched patients treated with AP. These associations were maintained for all types of stroke, including ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke.
This nonrandomized observational study suggests that anticoagulation therapy might be associated with a reduced risk of recurrent stroke compared with antiplatelet therapy in patients with ESUS in whom no potential source of embolism was identified. Further study should be performed in consideration of a potential source of embolism even in patients with ESUS.
本研究旨在确定与抗血小板药物(APs)相比,对于无潜在栓塞源的不明来源栓塞性脑卒中(ESUS)患者,使用口服抗凝剂(OACs)是否与降低复发性脑卒中风险相关。
在 2007 年 6 月至 2017 年 5 月期间,我们从福冈脑卒中注册中心的 7 个中心纳入了 8790 名急性缺血性脑卒中患者,其中 681 名(平均年龄 69.7 [14.1] 岁,48.3%为男性)患者患有 ESUS 且无潜在的栓塞源,并单独接受 OAC 或 APs 治疗。我们使用 Cox 比例风险模型和 Fine-Gray 模型估计出院后复发性缺血性脑卒中或任何类型脑卒中的风险比(HRs)和 95%置信区间(CIs)。
在平均 3.4(1.7)年的随访期间,489 名接受 APs 治疗的患者中有 4.4 人/100 人年发生复发性缺血性脑卒中,192 名接受 OAC 治疗的患者中有 2.0 人/100 人年发生复发性缺血性脑卒中。即使在校正潜在混杂因素后(多变量校正 HR [95%CI],0.42 [0.23-0.80]),以及将死亡视为竞争风险后(0.45 [0.24-0.85]),OAC 的使用与复发性缺血性脑卒中风险降低相关。在接受 OAC 治疗的患者中(0.32 [0.15-0.67]),与接受 APs 治疗的倾向评分匹配患者相比,这种降低复发性缺血性脑卒中的风险仍然存在。这些关联在所有类型的脑卒中(包括缺血性和出血性脑卒中)中均成立。
这项非随机观察性研究表明,与抗血小板治疗相比,对于无潜在栓塞源的 ESUS 患者,抗凝治疗可能与降低复发性脑卒中风险相关。即使对于患有 ESUS 的患者,也应该考虑潜在的栓塞源,进一步开展研究。