From Department of Cardiology, Atrial Fibrillation Study group, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark (P.B.N., T.B.L., F.S., A.G.-R., L.H.R.); Aalborg Thrombosis Research Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Aalborg University, Denmark (P.B.N., T.B.L., F.S., A.G.-R., L.H.R., G.Y.H.L.); and University of Birmingham Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, City Hospital, United Kingdom (G.Y.H.L.).
Circulation. 2015 Aug 11;132(6):517-25. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.015735. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
Intracranial hemorrhage is the most feared complication of oral anticoagulant treatment. The optimal treatment option for patients with atrial fibrillation who survive an intracranial hemorrhage remains unknown. We hypothesized that restarting oral anticoagulant treatment was associated with a lower risk of stroke and mortality in comparison with not restarting.
Linkage of 3 Danish nationwide registries in the period between 1997 and 2013 identified patients with atrial fibrillation on oral anticoagulant treatment with incident intracranial hemorrhage. Patients were stratified by treatment regimens (no treatment, oral anticoagulant treatment, or antiplatelet therapy) after the intracranial hemorrhage. Event rates were assessed 6 weeks after hospital discharge and compared with Cox proportional hazard models. In 1752 patients (1 year of follow-up), the rate of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism and all-cause mortality (per 100 person-years) for patients treated with oral anticoagulants was 13.6, in comparison with 27.3 for nontreated patients and 25.7 for patients receiving antiplatelet therapy. The rate of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism and all-cause mortality (per 100 person-years) for recurrent intracranial hemorrhage, the rate of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism, and all-cause mortality (per 100 person-years) patients treated with oral anticoagulants was 8.0, in comparison with 8.6 for nontreated patients and 5.3 for patients receiving antiplatelet therapy. The adjusted hazard ratio of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism and all-cause mortality was 0.55 (95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.78) in patients on oral anticoagulant treatment in comparison with no treatment. For ischemic stroke/systemic embolism and for all-cause mortality, hazard ratios were 0.59 (95% confidence interval, 0.33-1.03) and 0.55 (95% confidence interval, 0.37-0.82), respectively.
Oral anticoagulant treatment was associated with a significant reduction in ischemic stroke/all-cause mortality rates, supporting oral anticoagulant treatment reintroduction after intracranial hemorrhage as feasible. Future trials are encouraged to guide clinical practice in these patients.
颅内出血是口服抗凝治疗最令人恐惧的并发症。对于幸存颅内出血的房颤患者,最佳的治疗选择仍不清楚。我们假设与不重新开始相比,重新开始口服抗凝治疗与较低的中风和死亡率相关。
在 1997 年至 2013 年期间,通过链接 3 个丹麦全国性登记处,确定了正在接受口服抗凝治疗且发生颅内出血的房颤患者。在颅内出血后,根据治疗方案(无治疗、口服抗凝治疗或抗血小板治疗)对患者进行分层。在出院后 6 周评估事件发生率,并与 Cox 比例风险模型进行比较。在 1752 例患者(1 年随访)中,接受口服抗凝治疗的患者的缺血性中风/全身性栓塞和全因死亡率(每 100 人年)为 13.6,而非治疗组为 27.3,抗血小板治疗组为 25.7。对于复发性颅内出血的患者,接受口服抗凝治疗的患者的缺血性中风/全身性栓塞和全因死亡率(每 100 人年)为 8.0,而非治疗组为 8.6,抗血小板治疗组为 5.3。与未治疗相比,接受口服抗凝治疗的患者的缺血性中风/全身性栓塞和全因死亡率的调整后风险比为 0.55(95%置信区间,0.39-0.78)。对于缺血性中风/全身性栓塞和全因死亡率,风险比分别为 0.59(95%置信区间,0.33-1.03)和 0.55(95%置信区间,0.37-0.82)。
口服抗凝治疗与缺血性中风/全因死亡率的显著降低相关,支持在颅内出血后重新开始口服抗凝治疗的可行性。鼓励未来的试验为这些患者指导临床实践。