Gulati Nicholas, Donnelly Douglas, Qian Yingzhi, Moran Una, Johannet Paul, Zhong Judy, Osman Iman
The Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
J Transl Med. 2020 Nov 11;18(1):430. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02612-5.
Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) improves survival outcomes for patients with several types of cancer including metastatic melanoma (MM), but serious immune-related adverse events requiring intervention with immunosuppressive medications occur in a subset of patients. Skin toxicity (ST) has been reported to be associated with better response to ICI. However, understudied factors, such as ST severity and potential survivor bias, may influence the strength of these observed associations.
To examine the potential confounding impact of such variables, we analyzed advanced cancer patients enrolled prospectively in a clinicopathological database with protocol-driven follow up and treated with ICI. We tested the associations between developing ST, stratified as no (n = 617), mild (n = 191), and severe (n = 63), and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in univariable and multivariable analyses. We defined severe ST as a skin event that required treatment with systemic corticosteroids. To account for the possibility of longer survival associating with adverse events instead of the reverse, we treated ST as a time-dependent covariate in an adjusted model.
Both mild and severe ST were significantly associated with improved PFS and OS (all P < 0.001). However, when adjusting for the time from treatment initiation to time of skin event, severe ST was not associated with PFS benefit both in univariable and multivariable analyses (P = 0.729 and P = 0.711, respectively). Receiving systemic steroids for ST did not lead to significant differences in PFS or OS compared to patients who did not receive systemic steroids.
Our data reveal the influence of time to event and its severity as covariates in analyzing the relationship between ST and ICI outcomes. These differences in outcomes cannot be solely explained by the use of immunosuppressive medications, and thus highlight the importance of host- and disease-intrinsic factors in determining ICI response and toxicity.
The patient data used in this manuscript come from patients who were prospectively enrolled in two institutional review board-approved databases at NYU Langone Health (institutional review board #10362 and #S16-00122).
免疫检查点抑制(ICI)可改善包括转移性黑色素瘤(MM)在内的多种癌症患者的生存结局,但一部分患者会出现需要使用免疫抑制药物进行干预的严重免疫相关不良事件。据报道,皮肤毒性(ST)与对ICI的更好反应相关。然而,一些研究不足的因素,如ST严重程度和潜在的幸存者偏差,可能会影响这些观察到的关联的强度。
为了检验此类变量的潜在混杂影响,我们分析了前瞻性纳入一个临床病理数据库的晚期癌症患者,这些患者接受方案驱动的随访并接受ICI治疗。我们在单变量和多变量分析中测试了发生ST(分为无ST(n = 617)、轻度ST(n = 191)和重度ST(n = 63))与无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)之间的关联。我们将重度ST定义为需要全身使用糖皮质激素治疗的皮肤事件。为了考虑不良事件与更长生存期相关而非相反情况的可能性,我们在调整模型中将ST作为时间依赖性协变量进行处理。
轻度和重度ST均与改善的PFS和OS显著相关(所有P < 0.001)。然而,在调整从治疗开始到皮肤事件发生的时间后,在单变量和多变量分析中,重度ST均与PFS获益无关(分别为P = 0.729和P = 0.711)。与未接受全身糖皮质激素治疗的患者相比,因ST接受全身糖皮质激素治疗并未导致PFS或OS出现显著差异。
我们的数据揭示了事件发生时间及其严重程度作为协变量在分析ST与ICI结局之间关系时的影响。这些结局差异不能仅通过使用免疫抑制药物来解释,因此突出了宿主和疾病内在因素在确定ICI反应和毒性方面的重要性。
本手稿中使用的患者数据来自前瞻性纳入纽约大学朗格尼健康中心两个机构审查委员会批准的数据库的患者(机构审查委员会编号#10362和#S16 - 00122)。