Suppr超能文献

基于急诊严重程度指数评估过敏性反应患者的 ED 分诊。

Assessment of ED triage of anaphylaxis patients based on the Emergency Severity Index.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America.

Division of Allergic Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Aug;46:449-455. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.10.057. Epub 2020 Oct 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To describe the emergency department (ED) triage of anaphylaxis patients based on the Emergency Severity Index (ESI), assess the association between ESI triage level and ED epinephrine administration, and determine characteristics associated with lower acuity triage ESI assignment (levels 3 and 4).

METHODS

We conducted a cohort study of adult and pediatric anaphylaxis patients between September 2010 and September 2018 at an academic ED. Patient characteristics and management were compared between Emergency Severity Index (ESI) triage level 1 or 2 versus levels 3 or 4 using logistic regression analysis. We adhered to STROBE reporting guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 1090 patient visits were included. There were 26 (2%), 515 (47%), 489 (45%), and 60 (6%) visits that were assigned an ESI triage level of 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Epinephrine was administered in the ED to 53% of patients triaged ESI level 1 or 2 and to 40% of patients triaged ESI level 3 or 4. Patients who were assigned a lower acuity ESI level of 3 or 4 had a longer median time from ED arrival to epinephrine administration compared to those with a higher acuity ESI level of 1 or 2 (28 min compared to 13 min, p < .001). A lower acuity ESI level was more likely to be assigned to visits with a chief concern of hives, rash, or pruritus (OR 2.33 [95% CI, 1.20-4.53]) and less likely to be assigned to visits among adults (OR, 0.43 [0.31-0.60]), patients who received epinephrine from emergency medical services (OR 0.56 [0.38-0.82]), presented with posterior pharyngeal or uvular angioedema (OR, 0.56 [0.38-0.82]), hypoxemia (OR, 0.34 [0.18-0.64]), or increased heart (OR 0.83 [0.73-0.95]) or respiratory (OR 0.70 [0.60-0.82]) rates.

CONCLUSION

Patients triaged to lower acuity ESI levels experienced delays in ED epinephrine administration. Adult and pediatric patients with skin-related chief concerns were more likely to be to be assigned lower acuity ESI levels. Further studies are needed to identify interventions that will improve ED anaphylaxis triage.

摘要

目的

根据紧急严重指数(ESI)描述过敏性反应患者在急诊科的分诊情况,评估 ESI 分诊级别与 ED 肾上腺素给药之间的关系,并确定与较低严重程度 ESI 分诊级别(3 级和 4 级)相关的特征。

方法

我们对 2010 年 9 月至 2018 年 9 月期间在一家学术急诊科就诊的成人和儿科过敏性反应患者进行了队列研究。使用逻辑回归分析比较了 ESI 分诊级别为 1 级或 2 级与 3 级或 4 级的患者的特征和治疗方法。我们遵循 STROBE 报告指南。

结果

共纳入 1090 例就诊。分别有 26(2%)、515(47%)、489(45%)和 60(6%)例就诊患者的 ESI 分诊级别为 1、2、3 和 4 级。在急诊科给予肾上腺素的患者中,ESI 分级为 1 或 2 级的患者占 53%,ESI 分级为 3 或 4 级的患者占 40%。与 ESI 分级较高的 1 或 2 级患者相比,ESI 分级较低的 3 或 4 级患者从急诊科到达至给予肾上腺素的中位时间更长(28 分钟比 13 分钟,p < 0.001)。ESI 分级较低更可能被分配给以荨麻疹、皮疹或瘙痒为主要关注点的就诊(比值比 2.33 [95%置信区间,1.20-4.53]),而不太可能被分配给成人就诊(比值比,0.43 [0.31-0.60]),从紧急医疗服务中接受肾上腺素的患者(比值比 0.56 [0.38-0.82]),出现咽后或悬雍垂血管性水肿(比值比 0.56 [0.38-0.82]),低氧血症(比值比 0.34 [0.18-0.64]),或心率(比值比 0.83 [0.73-0.95])或呼吸率(比值比 0.70 [0.60-0.82])增加的患者。

结论

分诊为较低 ESI 级别的患者在急诊科接受肾上腺素治疗的时间延迟。以皮肤相关主诉为主要关注点的成人和儿科患者更可能被分配为较低 ESI 级别。需要进一步研究确定改善 ED 过敏反应分诊的干预措施。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验