• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

回顾性研究在急诊科或医院治疗的药物性过敏反应:患者特征、处理方法和 1 年随访。

Retrospective study of drug-induced anaphylaxis treated in the emergency department or hospital: patient characteristics, management, and 1-year follow-up.

机构信息

Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.

Division of Asthma and Allergy, Department of Pediatrics, Rhode Island Hospital, Alpert School of Medicine at Brown University, Providence, RI.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2014 Jan-Feb;2(1):46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2013.08.012. Epub 2013 Oct 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.jaip.2013.08.012
PMID:24565768
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Drugs are a common cause of anaphylaxis, which is potentially life threatening.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to describe US patients with an emergency department (ED) visit or hospitalization for drug-induced anaphylaxis (DIA), including postdischarge follow-up care.

METHODS

By using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes in the MarketScan Database, we identified all patients with an ED visit and/or hospitalization for DIA between 2002 and 2008 (index date = initial ED visit and/or hospitalization). Inclusion required continuous full insurance coverage ≥1 year in the pre- and postindex period. We examined patient factors during the preindex period, characteristics of the index event, and outcomes during the postindex period.

RESULTS

The cohort included 716 patients with an ED visit and/or hospitalization for DIA (mean age, 48 years; 71% women). Most patients (71%) were managed in the ED, and only 8% of the patients with DIA treated in the ED received epinephrine. For those admitted, patients were hospitalized for a median of 3 days, and 41% spent time in the intensive care unit. Cardiorespiratory failure occurred in 5% of the patients in the ED and 23% of the patients who were hospitalized. The patients with a concomitant allergic condition were more likely to see an allergist/immunologist than those without a concomitant allergic condition, but 82% did not receive any subsequent care with an allergist/immunologist in the 1 year after the ED visit and/or hospitalization for DIA.

CONCLUSION

Drugs are a common, yet under-recognized, cause of anaphylaxis. Only a small number of patients with DIA received epinephrine in the ED or had subsequent care with an allergist/immunologist. These findings are novel and identify areas for improvement in the care of individuals with DIA.

摘要

背景

药物是引发过敏反应的常见原因,这种过敏反应可能危及生命。

目的

我们旨在描述美国因药物引起的过敏反应(DIA)而到急诊科(ED)就诊或住院的患者,包括出院后的随访护理。

方法

我们利用 MarketScan 数据库中的国际疾病分类第 9 版编码,在 2002 年至 2008 年期间(索引日期=首次 ED 就诊和/或住院)确定所有因 DIA 而到 ED 就诊和/或住院的患者。纳入标准为在就诊前和就诊后 1 年内连续、充分的保险覆盖。我们研究了就诊前的患者因素、索引事件的特征和就诊后的结果。

结果

该队列纳入了 716 例因 DIA 而到 ED 就诊和/或住院的患者(平均年龄 48 岁,71%为女性)。大多数患者(71%)在 ED 接受治疗,仅 8%的 DIA 患者在 ED 接受了肾上腺素治疗。对于住院患者,中位住院时间为 3 天,41%的患者入住重症监护病房。ED 中 5%的患者和住院患者中有 23%发生心肺衰竭。同时患有过敏性疾病的患者比没有同时患有过敏性疾病的患者更有可能看过敏科医生/免疫学家,但有 82%的患者在因 DIA 到 ED 就诊和/或住院后的 1 年内未接受任何后续的过敏科医生/免疫学家治疗。

结论

药物是过敏反应的常见但未被充分认识的原因。只有少数 DIA 患者在 ED 接受了肾上腺素治疗或在后续接受了过敏科医生/免疫学家的治疗。这些发现是新颖的,确定了改善 DIA 患者护理的改进领域。

相似文献

1
Retrospective study of drug-induced anaphylaxis treated in the emergency department or hospital: patient characteristics, management, and 1-year follow-up.回顾性研究在急诊科或医院治疗的药物性过敏反应:患者特征、处理方法和 1 年随访。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2014 Jan-Feb;2(1):46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2013.08.012. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
2
Longitudinal study of 954 patients with stinging insect anaphylaxis.954 例蜂蜇过敏患者的纵向研究。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2013 Sep;111(3):199-204.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2013.06.020. Epub 2013 Jul 21.
3
Food-induced anaphylaxis among commercially insured US adults: patient concordance with postdischarge care guidelines.商业保险覆盖的美国成年人食物诱发的过敏反应:患者与出院后护理指南的一致性。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2013 Nov-Dec;1(6):595-601.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2013.07.003. Epub 2013 Sep 8.
4
Concordance with recommended postdischarge care guidelines among children with food-induced anaphylaxis.食物诱导性过敏儿童与推荐的出院后护理指南的一致性。
J Pediatr. 2014 Jun;164(6):1444-8.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.02.022. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
5
Risk factors for severe anaphylaxis in patients receiving anaphylaxis treatment in US emergency departments and hospitals.美国急诊科和医院接受过敏治疗患者中严重过敏反应的风险因素。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014 Nov;134(5):1125-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.05.018. Epub 2014 Jun 27.
6
Temporal Trends in Epinephrine Dispensing and Allergy/Immunology Follow-up Among Emergency Department Anaphylaxis Patients in the United States, 2005-2014.美国 2005-2014 年急诊过敏反应患者肾上腺素给药和过敏/免疫学随访的时间趋势。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 Sep-Oct;5(5):1272-1279.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.06.009. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
7
Anaphylaxis management in the pediatric emergency department: opportunities for improvement.儿科急诊科的过敏反应管理:改进的机会
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010 Feb;26(2):71-6. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181ce2e1c.
8
Multicenter study of emergency department visits for food allergies.食物过敏急诊就诊情况的多中心研究。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004 Feb;113(2):347-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2003.10.053.
9
Changes in Emergency Department Concordance with Guidelines for the Management of Food-Induced Anaphylaxis: 1999-2001 versus 2013-2015.急诊室与食物诱导性过敏管理指南的一致性变化:1999-2001 年与 2013-2015 年。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Sep-Oct;7(7):2262-2269. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.04.004. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
10
Predictors of epinephrine dispensing and allergy follow-up after emergency department visit for anaphylaxis.过敏性反应急诊就诊后肾上腺素配药及过敏随访的预测因素。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2017 Nov;119(5):452-458.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
The Expanding Role of Omalizumab: From Food Allergy to Drug Desensitization.奥马珠单抗的作用拓展:从食物过敏到药物脱敏
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Aug 14;26(16):7868. doi: 10.3390/ijms26167868.
2
Oxidative Stress and Mitochondria Are Involved in Anaphylaxis and Mast Cell Degranulation: A Systematic Review.氧化应激与线粒体参与过敏反应和肥大细胞脱颗粒:一项系统综述。
Antioxidants (Basel). 2024 Jul 29;13(8):920. doi: 10.3390/antiox13080920.
3
Active surveillance and clinical analysis of anaphylaxis based on the China Hospital Pharmacovigilance System.
基于中国医院药物警戒系统的过敏反应主动监测与临床分析
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Jul 11;14:1180685. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1180685. eCollection 2023.
4
Latin American anaphylaxis registry.拉丁美洲过敏反应登记处。
World Allergy Organ J. 2023 Feb 5;16(2):100748. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2023.100748. eCollection 2023 Feb.
5
Real World Management of Anaphylaxis Versus the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) Guidelines.过敏反应的真实世界管理与英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)指南对比
Cureus. 2022 Sep 19;14(9):e29336. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29336. eCollection 2022 Sep.
6
Drug-Related Hypersensitivity Reactions Leading to Emergency Department: Original Data and Systematic Review.导致急诊科就诊的药物相关过敏反应:原始数据与系统评价
J Clin Med. 2022 May 16;11(10):2811. doi: 10.3390/jcm11102811.
7
Drug-induced anaphylaxis in the emergency department: A prospective observational study.急诊科药物诱导的过敏反应:一项前瞻性观察研究。
North Clin Istanb. 2021 Dec 31;8(6):595-600. doi: 10.14744/nci.2021.56667. eCollection 2021.
8
Antibiotic Use in Patients With β-Lactam Allergies and Pneumonia: Impact of an Antibiotic Side Chain-Based Cross-Reactivity Chart Combined With Enhanced Allergy Assessment.β-内酰胺类过敏患者与肺炎患者的抗生素使用:基于抗生素侧链交叉反应性图表并结合强化过敏评估的影响
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 17;9(1):ofab544. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab544. eCollection 2022 Jan.
9
Increasing Operational Capacity and Reducing Costs of Rituximab Administration: A Costing Analysis.提高利妥昔单抗给药的操作能力并降低成本:成本分析
ACR Open Rheumatol. 2020 May;2(5):261-268. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11133. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
10
Sex and Gender Aspects for Patient Stratification in Allergy Prevention and Treatment.性别和性别的相关因素在过敏预防和治疗中的患者分层。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Feb 24;21(4):1535. doi: 10.3390/ijms21041535.